Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 1

[edit]

Author requested the deletion of said photo Shklalom (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose In use, in COM:SCOPE regardless, and out of the courtesy window for COM:CSD G7. If the subject wants a more current image of themselves in their article, they are free to release one under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 00:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "US Navy" public domain claim is phoney. This is a rather poor cropped reproduction of a painting by Thomas C Skinner (American, 1888-1955). Part of his signature is seen bottom right; in this larger size art print, published by the Mariners Museum, Newport News VA, it is there in full: https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/s-s-united-states-print-273-c-0564b87922

Judging by the caption on the reverse, the postcard image must have been published after July 1952 see: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/405071847497

Skinner was employed as staff artist at the Museum: https://www.marinersmuseum.org/2020/07/12480/ . Davidships (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024年8月30日 (金) 16:46‎ (UTC)に、User:Licsakさんにより、即時削除{{copyvio}}が貼られましたが、 投稿者である私User:Bcxfu75kは、削除対象では無いと考えています。 なぜなら、本画像は文字のみで構成されており、日本国法律の「著作権による保護の対象となるために必要とされるいわゆる創作性の基準を満たしていない(日本法においては、思想又は感情を創作的に表現したものではない)」であり、パブリックドメインに属すると考えます。 Template:PD-textlogoTemplate:TrademarkedTemplate:TOO-Japanもご参照ください。 Bcxfu75k (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

私もアサヒビールのロゴ裁判にて{{TOO-Japan}}および{{PD-textlogo}}の適用下である可能性を考えましたが、元の著作物から装飾を除去し、創作の閾値をあえて下げてフォントだけにしたものが二次的著作物の範疇になるかどうか、あえて削除議論にて問うたものです。第三者の意見を待ちましょう。
At the Asahi Breweries (Holdings) logo trial, I also considered the possibility that {{TOO-Japan}} and {{PD-textlogo}} were applied, but I deliberately asked in the deletion discussion whether removing decorations from the original work and deliberately lowering the creative threshold to only fonts would fall under the category of derivative works. Let's wait for the third party's opinion. Licsak (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete 依頼者票 (Vote of requester)。同様に装飾を除去して作成されたFile:虎に翼ロゴ.pngCOM:NETCOPYVIOで削除されました。おそらくこちらも同様かと。
The File:虎に翼ロゴ.png created by removing the decorations was also removed by COM:NETCOPYVIO. I think it's probably the same here.
--Licsak (talk) 06:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No proof of it being public domain. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped original photo. Cropped image is not needed anymore Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 02:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cropped from https://www.erinaendo.com/ eien20 (talk) 03:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

same https://www.erinaendo.com/ eien20 (talk) 03:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This radio station logo is highly unlikely to be a CC0-licensed own work; its depiction of the New York City skyline might put this over TOO. WCQuidditch 03:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This radio station logo, is the newest Logo of WEPN 98.7 FM. TJ 98.7Fm A Pop-Up station. You have also attached many of my images before and it hasn’t gone unnoticed… You also spammed my pages it has also gone unnoticed… I would like to point out I would like you to leave me alone. Thank you. As I do know the Wikipedia rules and follow them accordingly. Mikey551415 (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File shall not be deleted Mikey551415 (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 05:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 05:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MrFool Mapping (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 05:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unofficial self-created flag per description. Omphalographer (talk) 05:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio from https://roblox.fandom.com/wiki/Emergency_Hamburg_(group)/Emergency_Hamburg Hoyanova (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Simple text logo possibly below the threshold of originality - I'm not sure what jurisdiction would apply - but the subject (a Roblox minigame) seems unlikely to be notable. Omphalographer (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not own work but art work without permission from the given artist as listed on nl-wikipeda - "Antje Krook afgebeeld in art-nouveau stijl. Geillustreerd door Iris van der Sluis" - Hoyanova (talk) 06:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mikey551415 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Despite the uploader's assertions, these images relating to the Mr. Six mascot that has been used by various iterations of the Six Flags theme park chain, which appear to come from Six Flags advertisements, are highly unlikely to be either CC-licensed "own works" or in the public domain. The uploader has removed copyvio tags, so a discussion (even of the "going through the motions" type) seems necessitated.

WCQuidditch 06:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The are on a public domain and you can get mr six images anywhere. I am not sure why my images gotta be target Mikey551415 (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Public domain has a specific legal meaning. It does not mean "available to the public". Omphalographer (talk) 07:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Mikey551415 (talk) 06:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep: It's not a valid reason. The logo that has a tilde falls below the threshold of originality and is ineligible to be copyrighted in the United States. - THV | | U | T - 10:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep No reason for deletion presented (text is PD), but likely a 'revenge nom' due to the nominator having several images not appropriate for Commons nominated for deletion. Suggest this be brought to a quick end and for Mikey to very quickly learn our image and copyright policies before they end up blocked. Nate (chatter) 23:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by איש עיטי as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by איש עיטי as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work rationale is dubious, it appears to be a crop from [1], which says it's "from the Al Holden collection", though doesn't say who the photographer is. It obviously wasn't taken in 2023, since she died in 2001. Legoktm (talk) 06:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1994 outdoor bas-relief mural. No FoP in the US for sculpture. James(talk/contribs) 06:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


1997 outdoor bas relief sculpture and tile murals. No FoP in the US for artwork. James(talk/contribs) 07:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded as own work, but metadata clearly states "Copyright: Sandro Moscogiuri"; also, appears at https://tech.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202407/24/WS66a0abf4a3107cd55d26c64e.html DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom. Not a UK Government work. DrKay (talk) 07:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a work of (street) art in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 08:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Libiya11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Is User:Libiya11 the same as the people behind Temehu website? The incomplete metadata of these images show copyright statement: "This images is copyrighted. All rights reserved. www.temehu.com." Otherwise, COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle may apply in this case.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the photo has logo too prominently depicted. Unless we get VRT-permission from "Globaalsed eestlased" rights holder, the image must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ma olen üsna kindel, et Rainer või Joonas pole selle pildi kasutamise vastu (Raineriga näiteks selle pildi tegemise ajal ka vestlesime, et see läheb Vikipeediasse), aga pole mahti lube taga ajada, nii et kui tuleb maha võtta siis tuleb maha võtta, mis seal ikka. Sillerkiil (talk) 12:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See on pigem ikkagi taustal. Vähemalt on üsna selge, et see logo pole kindlasti foto põhimotiiviks ja pole ka olnud põhjuseks, miks fotograaf selle ülesvõtte tegi. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by I.Mahesh as no source (No source since) Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangan Datta Wiki Hello, please check that text in India is not covered under Freedom of Panorama. If the text is produced by the Government of India, you can tag with with GODL license, please check if it falls under the same, thanks.iMahesh (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC) iMahesh (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Heart Truth 2011

[edit]

According to the EXIF data in Flickr, which is not visible here in Commons for some unknown reason, the copyright holder of the images are DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the Flickr uploader.--Syrus257 (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file has no basis in reliable official sources - poor copy Buckshot06 (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Mirjam Knickriem - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Katja Irion - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nochmal zur Erklärung: Christian Besch hat die Urheberrechte an diesem Pressefoto übertragen bekommen und hat mir dieses eigens für diesen Zweck hier geschickt! Was können wir tun, damit das Bild nicht gelöscht wird? Junei1986 (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have him contact COM:VRT, or you can contact them if you can present written evidence for the permission you say you have. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MAYYAWEE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Studio quality photos with no exif, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wcamp9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickrwashing. The one from flickr is credited Microfilm from January 27, 1992 Newsweek. Need VRT to prove Newsweek or the photographer gave the rights to us

Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jaragustin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

the webp is likely taken from the web and then cropped to make the jpg. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That photo belongs to Natalie Pauline Agustin. It was sourced from her personal archives The Nalie.webp was downloaded but need to be cropped out as it accidentally added her other photo. Jaragustin (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You need to show COM:VRT that you have permission to license her photo, or have her contact them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map is not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Looks like an excerpt of this UK Hydrographic Office chart, but the version I found didn't have the "high risk area" marked (probably because it's a few years newer than this upload). The original chart may have some educational value, but this undated, low-resolution, cropped thumbnail doesn't. Omphalographer (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too blurred to be of any use. No meaningful description. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 10:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of non-notable person, out of scope: en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukwuegbu Anthony Chijioke Nutshinou Talk! 10:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Drxsushantojha (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyright violation (unless this is just PD-simple which is definitely possible). There is no evidence that it was licensed under CC0 on the Discord branding page linked to in the description... PseudoSkull (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find a copyright for logos, because of this I've set as CC. After delete, I'll search again. Wiki6421 (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This logo meets the threshold for copyright protection, should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. View logo copyright license at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Discord_logo.svg Astrinko (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This a old photo, not own work, no source. Not cc-by-sa shizhao (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and File:Z8 BrunoHeinemann Indienststellung.jpg shizhao (talk) 11:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of the commissioning of the ship, which, according to German Wikipedia, was on 8 January 1938, so that should be the date of creation of this photo. Nakonana (talk) 22:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of a ship that sunk on 25 january 1942 , so that's the latest possible creation date. Nakonana (talk) 22:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image is likely a crop from a postcard. I've found several similar motives which were released by several different publishers in postcard serieses around the Kriegsmarine. See for example:
Are there any particular postcard-related license regulations for postcards from the Third Reich? Nakonana (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio: Image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under copyright of Nico Draps Gabon100 (talk) 11:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pour remplacer par une photo plus récente Jérémy le Français (talk) 11:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mr. Andersson aka Neo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Geohakkeri (talk) 12:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio - probably AI upscaled and retouched from https://ayartimes.com/?p=23948 159.205.179.12 19:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for your input. I wanted to clarify that the image File:Moe Myint Tun.jpg is actually sourced from this website: https://min.news/en/military/2041a79f5758b0eb92273c553d9334f3.html, not from https://ayartimes.com/?p=23948. And actually not AI upscaled or retouched since it's from the official website.
Best regards,
KhantWiki KhantWiki (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. min.news is not "official website" of Myanmar government/army so it doesn't matter.
2. ayartimes published earlier (august 2023) unretouched photo, photo from min.news is since then (august 2024) derivative work - both copyrighted
2. both sources do not contain CC license information, but "All rights reserved" at footer. 159.205.179.12 14:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Not 'own work' and no evidence of a free license on https://min.news/en/military/2041a79f5758b0eb92273c553d9334f3.html. --Achim55 (talk) 19:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating this image for deletion because it is an AI-enhanced version, which may not meet the standards for use on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. I recently uploaded the original version, which is a key consideration for maintaining authenticity and quality of content on these platforms. KhantWiki (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moe Myint Tun during a meeting in Russia in June 2021.jpg NinjaStrikers «» 12:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

en:Shams Tabrez is deleted due to non-notability. Probably his photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the threshold of originality, see [2] Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the threshold of originality, see [3] Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lacks a license for home country (Ireland). {{PD-old-assumed}} won't apply until 2033. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added Template:PD-Ireland-anon. Google Arts and Culture,[4] which usually lists a photographer in every instance it can for a photographer, does not have a named author for this photograph. CeltBrowne (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've now also added Template:PD-UK-unknown as the image is from 1912, when Ireland was still a part of the United Kingdom. I'm not sure whether Irish law or British law takes precedence for photography taken before Ireland left the United Kingdom in 1922. CeltBrowne (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe Ireland assumed the copyright of items published there upon independence. Regardless, it is Commons' standard to use the local copyright after a colony splits. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This file is obviously PD. 185.172.241.184 12:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not in PD as claimed. Could be in 1960s as the linked picture. Notice the same suit and background? George Ho (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mediacom EPFL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All credited to EPFL media library, needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader's account has a ticket. Can you check if the uploads are covered and fix accordingly?
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please check if any uploads might have been deleted by error.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by VIVREETAIMER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by LakesideLibrarian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One credited to 2024 Lightchasers, all rights reserved. - unlikely to be own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 14:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jonathan Melchor O. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JustBort (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No proof this is Bamsi Beyrek. Beshogur (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by DaxServer as no permission (No permission since) Ankry (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It seems to be 1905 anonymous publication, so its copyright expired in both: India and US. Moreover, the book cover is probably {{PD-ineligible}} as too simple for copyright protection. Ankry (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, I didn't notice the year when I tagged. Thanks for looking it up -- DaxServer (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Floris Minderhoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

c1943 photos, not own work. may be free but needs more info

Gbawden (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a fictional made-up coat of arms, based on the modern Egyptian arms and using Neo-Tifinagh, an alphabet dating from at least the1970's. Il Qathar (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Sadakathosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, more than one have FBMD

Gbawden (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small low-rez blurry shot that is not going to be used. Category:Claude Julien has numerous superior images. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 15:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mhmithun001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Text content only, no description, bad names, should be done with LaTeX: en:Help:Displaying a formula.

Yann (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from a Facebook page that does not state a CC BY 4.0 licence at all for this or any other of their pictures; definitely wrong claim of copyright holder. MrBenjo (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No source available. Possibly copyrighted Yann (talk) 15:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is part of another project of Wikimedia Foundation Chile and has license (by-nc). Is not a copyright violation.
Enterreno | Fotos históricas de Chile Alexisaherven (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable; self-promotion and nominated for deletion on esWiki Niccocl (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from https://andamanlawcollege.andaman.gov.in/; no evidence of own work WikiEditor50 (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Il n'y a aucune preuve de détention du média -Mozz1217 (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since).

1913 photograph that now has a license, but since author is unknown, we cannot yet assume author has been dead for 70 years. Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Move to German wikipedia. Suits the 100 year rule there. Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my work. I didn't know about all the rules when I uploaded the picture. মোঃ সাকিবুল হাসান (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This is not my work. I didn't know about all the rules when I uploaded the picture. মোঃ সাকিবুল হাসান (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unlikely to be own work; the subject of the photo died in 1992. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from https://web.archive.org/web/20210723164716/https://www.danieldimartino.com/beca; no evidence of own work WikiEditor50 (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Paul Wenck, who died in 1964. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2035.

Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Bad image Noah Aitchison Braga2024 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think your argument is not enough. In addition, the image doesn't reference the "Virgin vs. Chad" meme, but the countryball representation of the African country of Chad. Universalis (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Eichsfelder-Tageblatt - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lower-quality version of the file "Erie Railroad station in Kennedy NY 1909 postcard.webp" that I had previously uploaded. I accidentally uploaded the better version separately rather than replacing the old one. FischerFotos (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong license. According to [5] ITER Organization retains copyright in the pictures and videos. [...] The pictures and videos may not be sold, distributed or otherwise made available for use by third parties BorgQueen (talk) 19:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already sent the release to the drop box. It follows: Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Maury,

Sorry for the late reply. You can certainly use all the materials found on our website, we would just appreciate if you could quote us @ITER Organization. Many thanks,

Cordiales salutations /Mit freundlichen Grüssen/Kind regards/Dozo yoroshiku

Cecile FOUCHER DE BRANDOIS Admin & Communication Assistant Communication Division

ITER Organization, Building 72/4048, Office of the Director-General Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon - CS 90 046 - 13067 St Paul Lez Durance Cedex - France Phone: +33 4 42 17 69 04 Get the latest ITER news on https://www.iter.org/whatsnew Follow us on: Twitter - Facebook - LinkedIn - Instagram - Career page

It doesn't work like that. It needs to go through Commons:Volunteer Response Team. SL93 (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In particular, Permission grants must specifically contain a free license grant and may not merely give permissions for Commons or Wikipedia. jlwoodwa (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelegte Darstellung, könnte auch frei erfunden sein - bis zum Beweis des Gegenteils out of scope GerritR (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too small to be useful - no details visible. Own work also doubtful. GerritR (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abbild eines vermutlich geschützten Werks - derivative of a copyrighted work GerritR (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Der Aufnäher zeigt unten einen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreiberg, ein seit Jahrhunderten genutztes Wappensymbol. Darüber stehen die Anfangsbuchstaben "DGN" für Deutsches Gymnasium Niederalteich; die simple Buchstabenform dürfte sich eher aus der Sticktechnik als einem schöpferischen Gedanken ergeben haben. Die farbige Gestaltung insgesamt ist durch die Verwendung zu erklären: Die Aufnäher befanden sich auf schwarzen "Turnleibchen". Insgesamt ist fraglich, ob es sich bei überschaubarer Schöpfungshöhe um ein geschütztes Werk handelt. Zudem wurde die Schule bereits Ende der 1950er Jahre in "St.-Gotthard-Gymnasium" umbenannt, so dass das Logo seit damals nicht mehr benutzt wird. Joachim Lierer (talk) 15:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the flag of Bavaria, and the coat of arms does not have this shape. Out of scope. GerritR (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyvio - most of this user's uploads of this subject were. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyvio - most of this user's uploads of this subject were. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyvio - most of this user's uploads of this subject were. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a screenshot from a video under copyright by Colorado Storm chasers, an LLC registered in Cascade, CO.[6]

They posted the video to their Facebook page[7] and their Twitter stream[8] and this screenshot appears to come from around the 0:10 mark.

It was filmed in the United States in 2021.

There is no claim that the anonymous Colorado Storm Chasers videographer was a US Federal government employee performing their duties, or that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

As an video made in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the video was made. Individual frames from a video under copyright are also under copyright.

This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  1. when the weather.gov general disclaimer says that material not in the public domain will be specifically noted, it means that it must be published with a formal copyright notice. Whereas in reality, not only has the NWS never promised any specific form of notation, there is ample evidence to demonstrate this is not their general practice. This belief also chooses to ignore the words elsewhere in the disclaimer that state that third party images are used by the NWS under license, and to contact the third-party creators for re-use.
  2. the words of a NWS Sioux City regional office policy that placed some public submissions in the public domain somehow applied to this image, although there is nothing to connect it with that office. (The still was published by the Grand Junction office).

Without clearer evidence that Colorado Storm Chasers intended to place this screenshot from their video in the public domain, we need to delete this under COM:PRP. Rlandmann (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per @Rlandmann and PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 15:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been sourced from Page 11 of Maddox, R. A., M. S. Gilmore, C. A. Doswell III, R. H. Johns, C. A. Crisp, D. W. Burgess, J. A. Hart, and S. F. Piltz, 2013: Meteorological analyses of the Tri-State tornado event of March 1925. Electronic J. Severe Storms Meteor., 8 (1), 1–27.

It was published in the United States in 2021.

Two out of eight of the article co-authors worked for the NOAA , but there is no claim that the article was written solely by US Federal government employees performing their duties.

As a work produced in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the article was written.

This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  • the general disclaimer for the weather.gov website advises that some of the content there is in the public domain
  • some images submitted to the NWS Sioux City regional office by members of the public are in the public domain

This image was not published on weather.gov, and there is nothing to connect it to the NWS Sioux City regional office, so neither of these rationales apply to this image. Rlandmann (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Delete – Although aspects of the image are in the PD (made by U.S. government employees as confirmed via the image caption), aspects of it are not PD, including the tornado tracks, which were modified by the authors. A check of the paper also indicate the project was funded by the w:National Science Foundation, not NOAA. If it was NOAA, that would be a different story as it would be PD as part of the NOAA Library Repository. I also checked the NOAA Library Repository and it is not listed. Due to the modifications and lack of potential evidence of PD status, this is a clear delete. WeatherWriter (talk) 00:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per @Rlandmann and @WeatherWriter. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken by Tim Marshall in the United States in 2023, and was included by the NWS in a presentation published to arcgis.com.[9]

There is no claim that Marshall was a US federal government employee performing his duties, or that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

As a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as it was taken.

This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  • the general disclaimer for the weather.gov website advises that some of the content there is in the public domain
  • some images submitted to the NWS Sioux City regional office by members of the public are in the public domain

This image was not published on weather.gov, and there is nothing to connect it to the NWS Sioux City regional office, so neither of these rationales apply to this image.

Without any evidence of permission that the photographer released this image into the public domain or under a free license, it is apparently unfree. Rlandmann (talk) 03:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per @Rlandmann and PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 15:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]