Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 4

[edit]

Unacceptable derivative work. The image on the screen is copyrighted unless proven otherwise. plicit 00:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Uneven bonds. Have File:Acetonitrile Structural Formula V1.svg as higher-quality in same format and style/detail DMacks (talk) 00:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. The triple bond's unequal lengths is not standard practice in chemical structure images. Since we have an equivalent image with the proper way of representing this bond, that one should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 12:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image is reshared from media sources protected by copyright, including the w:Lansing State Journal,[1] w:Detroit Free Press,[2] and possibly others.

It was taken by Bill Bouwman in the United States in 2023.

It was uploaded to Commons under the rationale that Bouwman was a US federal government employee performing his duties, although there was no evidence supplied for this.

There is no claim that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

As a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the image was made.

The uploader later changed the rationale to those expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  1. when the weather.gov general disclaimer says that material not in the public domain will be specifically noted, it means that it must be published with a formal copyright notice. Whereas in reality, not only has the NWS never promised any specific form of notation, there is ample evidence to demonstrate this is not their general practice. This belief also chooses to ignore the words elsewhere in the disclaimer that state that third party images are used by the NWS under license, and to contact the third-party creators for re-use.
  2. the words of a NWS Sioux City regional office policy that placed some public submissions in the public domain somehow applied to this image, although there is nothing to connect it with that office. (The still was published by the Detroit office).

Without clearer evidence that Bouwman intended to place this image in the public domain, we need to delete this under COM:PRP. Rlandmann (talk) 01:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



PRP Delete per @Rlandmann Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Request from uploader, It's a lower quality copy of File:Georges Desmarées - Portrait of Cologne Prince-Elector Klement August (Portrait of a Prince) - O 94 - Slovak National Gallery.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 03:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 03:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a (vaguely Asian-styled) temple. Omphalographer (talk) 03:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ElvesTOON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal images. The uploader appears to be using the file page for File:ElvesTOON.png as an autobiography.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 03:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

probably not an own work. Irrawaddy News had published the photo since 2022. NinjaStrikers «» 04:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also extracted photo File:Aung Lin Dwe (cropped).jpg NinjaStrikers «» 08:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an own work. According to Myanmar Now, this photo is an extracted photo from one of Russia Ministry of Defence's work. But can't find similar photos in Category:Media from the Russian Ministry of Defence, 2021 NinjaStrikers «» 04:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate SnozYT (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Caption also says that those are the genitals of the uploader. Underage kids shouldn't be uploading photos of their genitals; they can't grasp the range and scale of possible consequences of such actions. Nakonana (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's also the uploader who is requesting deletion within 7 days of upload. Nakonana (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete obviously Dronebogus (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Inappropriate SnozYT (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Caption also says that those are the genitals of the uploader. Underage kids shouldn't be uploading photos of their genitals; they can't grasp the range and scale of possible consequences of such actions. Nakonana (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's also the uploader who is requesting deletion within 7 days of upload. Nakonana (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


copyright violation of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chebrole_Chaturmukha_Brahma_Temple.jpg Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo credit should read: Jonathan Hordle/PA Media Assignments, not FCDO's work A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Like the other photos in this category, which are almost all from the same source. HaT59 (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Cnothom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, self promotional images; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan メイド理世 (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Japan メイド理世 (talk) 05:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


uploaded as own work, but image appears eg. here https://inplaymusicschool.com/aleksei-vyzhanov/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Telugu source is not copyleft license Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English wiki version is copy left at File:Dr.Khader,_Food_and_nutrient_expert,Mysore.jpg Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan メイド理世 (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan メイド理世 (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 06:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! This was discussed already several times..there are works commissioned by the city government and they release them in CC. Cheers! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work, good quality but no exif, uploader claims to be in the photo, PCP Gbawden (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Very blurred image, There no FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States メイド理世 (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 06:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Alex Mihaila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I am unable to verify any of these CC claims. All the sites they are linked to state (c). Needs proof of CC to keep

Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ArchiloversKato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, most of the files have author info in exif, needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 06:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

webp filename indicates it came from the web, no exif, only upload by new user, similar to https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/hulk-of-atletico-mineiro-celebrates-celebrates-with-news-photo/1314874893?adppopup=true - this is unlikely to be own work. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rezygnuje z udostępnia tego zdjęcia komukolwiek. Dziękuję Piorog (talk) 07:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


possible copyvio: Original work with unknown author from 1932 and wrong license. To young for {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}, could be undeleted on commons after 120yrs. See also the german discussion on de.wp regarding the same picture: [3] Wdwd (talk) 07:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


copyright issue Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely recent and thereby still copyrighted work of art. Unfortunately, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Licence tag has to changed Coolmaster69 (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Depicted sculpture likely by Giacomo Manzu, who died only in 1991, whereby his works are still in copyright. Regrettably, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission by the sculptor is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear if the image was actually taken by the Philippine National Police, the text on the photo suggests that it was actually taken by Indonesian law enforcement (in that case COM:NOP Indonesia would apply). Photo would be a handout to the PNP Hariboneagle927 (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It was taken by Indonesian law enforcement. As a work made by them, the licensing should be replaced from PD-PhilippinesGov to PD-IDGov. Ishagaturo (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Works made by Indonesian government employees are considered to be in the public domain. Also, I will request to change the title of this photograph to have "Philippine National Police photo of" taken out. Ishagaturo (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It was indeed taken by the Indonesian Government and was also distributed through public domain to the Philippine Government. Wiki's Slash (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: It was taken by Indonesian Governmen and it should be {{PD-IDGov}} and {{PD-PhilippineGov}}. and it's a Public Domain.
Royiswariii (talk) 01:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Educational value is not shown. Look file description. Uploader is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Meaningless icon of no potential use. Omphalographer (talk) 00:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depicted sculpture likely recent and still in copyright. Unfortunately, Japan has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. So, a permission by the sculptor is need or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Same problem with:

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep, the allegedly violating image (File:Eyal Yifrach, Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel.jpg) is hosted on Commons under a Creative Commons CC-BY-2.0 license. Kingofthedead (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep, the allegedly violating image (File:Eyal Yifrach, Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel.jpg) is hosted on Commons under a Creative Commons CC-BY-2.0 license. On top of that, it's fairly blurred in this photo. Kingofthedead (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image delete Romanmalikkhan (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide a reason for deletion. Nakonana (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there's already a deletion discussion on that file here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Romanmalikkhan. I don't know why the uploader removed the initial nomination just to re-nominate the files for deletion. Nakonana (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Courtesy artwork of Ahmet Keyman per description A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy artwork from Chicago, Illinois A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted artwork, not US Government work A1Cafel (talk) 10:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Застаріла інформація Kadmro (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly personal photo with unclear educational value Fenikals (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo without educational value Fenikals (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo without educational value Fenikals (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo without educational value Fenikals (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo without educational value Fenikals (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The flag is incorrect, The Empire of Japan uses the Hinomaru flag as it does today but it only became Japan’s national flag back in 1999. The army ensign should not be used as the flag of The Empire of Japan. The army flag is the Army ensign: NOT THE NATIONAL FLAG. RepublicOfKorea1945 (talk) 11:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an accuracy disputed tag. Nakonana (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 11:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 11:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted commercial image, bad license, no permission 2A01:599:90E:197:6C1B:CF25:264B:4C0B 11:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Toy Story exhibitions

[edit]

Concept art and models created by Pixar for the Toy Story films, shown in a museum exhibit. All of these works are copyrighted.

The Casper doll is estimated to be from the 1960's and is still under copyright, per COM:TOYS

--ReneeWrites (talk) 11:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Flickr license is invalid; there's no reason to believe the artistic works in the photos are freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status and advertising Fenikals (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded from Facebook. The source does not indcate a creative commons. Mashkawat.ahsan (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly personal photo of low quality Fenikals (talk) 11:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted "©2017 Stefano Cavada" from: https://stefanocavada.it/ Holapaco77 (talk) 11:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal screenshot without educational value Fenikals (talk) 11:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. Not sue is it public domain or not. Fenikals (talk) 11:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo Fenikals (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ErfanRahmati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios. Logo + Book cover + unfree photographs taken from the internet

HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permission needed HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph by Kaveh Sardari, permission needed HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bad quality, image motif available several times in good quality MeAmME (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright infringement Zlanek (talk) 12:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyright infringement Zlanek (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyright infringement Zlanek (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Personal photo of non-contributor Fenikals (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of non-contributor Fenikals (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of non contributor Fenikals (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo without educational value Fenikals (talk) 13:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo without educational value Fenikals (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted fictional character, Wikimedia Commons doesn't allow these characters, since it's fair use. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Derivate works. I doubt the Flickr account owns the copyright of the original works.

Yann (talk) 13:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source channel looks like a random YouTube channel, which uploads random videos. But the video copyright holder is Bolivar TV, maybe this YouTube channel is the main copyright holder, where I can't see any cc license in any of their videos. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Press / promotional picture. A permission from the copyright holder is needed. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of non-contributor Fenikals (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status and educational value Fenikals (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status and educational value Fenikals (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: found on https://tineye.com/search/02d3cb37165e7f95761e9694474392ba1e5e79a5?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 Yann (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3D model of indef blocked Hoa, (1) composite of uncited original files, (2) structure of a salt depicted as a pair of cation and anions. Wostr (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ابن الزهرا (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of non-contributor Fenikals (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double copyright violation: copyrighted building as well as billboard advertisement, considering the Philippines not having commercial Freedom of Panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Stamps in Russia are exempt from copyright only in its entirety. When those are cropped, they become covered by copyright protection. For example, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oleg Dahl Postal card Russia 2016cr.jpg. 92.243.182.19 14:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original on sw have no license. MGA73 (talk) 14:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted material, unfree license 2A01:C23:B997:A800:3933:AF2A:8569:63E9 14:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - File was requested for a rename, but the reason was not good. So now I also see it is possibly copyrighted.. I say: delete. The user just reverted all my declines.. Should be blocked, but I'm not gonna do that. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dog faces off with an angry opossum - Flickr - simpleinsomnia.jpg , images attributed to the SimpleInsomnia flickr account have no provenance and their copyright status cannot be ascertained Юрий Д.К 14:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is a calendar on the picture. Year not visible but it has been taken in September or November with 24th belongs to Sunday. Maybe someone can clarify of date of creation. If not then delete. Юрий Д.К 15:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pranavhatt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kilted Weirdo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, non-notable, personal logo, likely to be out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dog faces off with an angry opossum - Flickr - simpleinsomnia.jpg Yann (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1945 picture could be in the public domain. Yann (talk) 15:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per the previous DR, nothing from the SimpleInsomnia Flickr account has provenance. It's all "found photos", which might as well be "unidentified photo albums that I bought for $5 on eBay". Even if it's from 1945, what else do we know about it? DS (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image is not signed, and it is scanned from a print, so the publication started when leaving the photographer's custody. Yann (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 17:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to be notable - see w:Rick Cordeiro. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image not being used on any articles on Wikipedia. Nhl4hamilton (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Author is Chris. 186.172.178.98 22:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then he has uploaded at least 5 photos of himself, but he isn't nominating all of them for deletion? The exif data also indicates that 3 different cameras were used to take the photos. Nakonana (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded a new version of it. HaWUG swot analysis1.jpg Em-mustapha (talk) 15:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to be notable - see w:Rick Cordeiro. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not being used on any wikipedia articles. Nhl4hamilton (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Heute hat über die Wikipedia:Telefonberatung der Eigentümer dieser beiden Gebäude angerufen. Die Eigentümer wünschen keine Veröffentlichung dieses Fotos im Internet und bitten um Löschung. Ihr Eigentum soll auf Fotos im Internet nicht erscheinen. Ich stelle das hier entsprechend zur Diskussion. Berlinschneid (talk) 15:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kann man am Telefon wirklich die tatsächliche Eigentümerschaft prüfen und belegen? Bwbuz (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, guter Hinweis. Es klang sehr glaubhaft. Ich denke, es ist genauso glaubhaft, wie wenn der Antrag von einer privaten E-Mail-Adresse gekommen wäre. --Berlinschneid (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn ich mich recht erinnere handelt es sich zudem um Gebäude welche unter Denkmalschutz stehen. Welche Regeln gelten hier für eine Löschung? Die tatsächliche Berechtigung zu dem zuvor formulierten Antrag des angeblichen Eigentümers mal vorausgesetzt. Bwbuz (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Zudem gilt die Panoramafreiheit (§ 59 UrhG) auch für Privatgebäude. Das bedeutet nach meiner Kenntnis, dass sie von öffentlichen Orten aus – wie hier geschehen – fotografiert werden dürfen – selbst wenn sie urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Bwbuz (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Es gibt in Deutschland zudem kein Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. Das heißt, selbst wenn einem das Haus gehört, kann man anderen Leuten nicht verbieten, es zu fotografieren. Aus rechtlicher Sicht besteht also kein Löschgrund. Wenn überhaupt, dann könnte man es quasi aus "Kulanz" löschen, aber dies wurde bei ähnlichen Anträgen in der Vergangenheit auch nicht gemacht, zumal es sich ja allen Anschein nach um ein Baudenkmal handelt und somit um ein Objekt von öffentlichen Interesse. Nakonana (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bin zufällig heute auf auf einen ähnlichen Fall gestoßen. Damals hat der damalige Justiziar gut begründet, weshalb aus rechtlicher Sicht eine Löschung nicht erforderlich sei. Trotzdem könnte sich die Community im Sinne der Eigentümer natürlich für eine Löschung entscheiden. Ich bin da meistens dafür, da ich denke, Wikipedia sollte nicht Leute (potentielle Spender) unnötig verärgern. Aber vielleicht seht Ihr das anders. Auch juristisch könnte der Fall um Nuancen natürlich anders gelagert sein. Am Ende muss ein Admin entscheiden. --Berlinschneid (talk) 20:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkmale_in_Lenzerwische#Mödlich und die hier zu findenden drei Einträge zur Lenzener Straße 14 Bwbuz (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Es gibt keinen Grund für eine Löschung. Die Panoramafreiheit greift bei einem Foto, welches von öffentlichem Grund aufgenommen wurde und hier haben wir ein Denkmalgeschütztes Gebäude, welches zudem im öffentlichen Interesse ist. Viel zu erkennen ist eh nicht auf dem Bild, somit halte ich eine Löschung nicht für nötig. Itti (talk) 07:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

도촬한 파일입니다. 그래서 삭제 처리합니다. 211.186.86.62 16:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

도촬된 파일입니다. 그래서 삭제 처리합니다. 앙미자 (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:앙미자, explain what you mean by a thief. Where was the image stolen from? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

도촬 아닙니다. 고려 사용자가 합법적으로 촬영한 사진을 편집한 것일 뿐입니다. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 22:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is absolutely no reason to delete it. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donde esta el scope? 186.173.22.81 16:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donde esta el scope? 186.173.22.81 16:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is..? 186.173.22.81 16:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This guy it seems: w:en:Bob Delle Bovi. Nakonana (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Map with a dubious US Gov license (description even notes a Smithsonian Institute copyright). Abzeronow (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo provenant du web et trouvable avec crédit photo de la société Baron Philippe de Rostchild ("BPR") Patteloup (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

presumingly COPYVIO, asking for 2nd opinion

Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid but we will need to delete these photos because they depict artworks by a living artist.

Gnom (talk) 07:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for

--Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Toga Sports (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The object is in the public domain, but the photo is copyrighted by the Boston Museum of Fine Arts. The uploader has assigned an invalid CC0 license. Per the museum's Terms of Use, downloaded photos may be used "for limited non-commercial, educational, and personal use only, or for fair use as defined in the United States copyright laws. ... COPYING OR REDISTRIBUTION IN ANY MANNER FOR COMMERCIAL USE, INCLUDING COMMERCIAL PUBLICATION, OR FOR PERSONAL GAIN IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED." (caps in the original). The object is a 3D sculpture, so PD-Art does not apply. This user has been previously warned about uploading copyrighted images from museum web sites. Crawdad Blues (talk) 18:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hamedfire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like part of someone's homework. No context as to why it's educational. Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not Creative Commons. Taken from a YouTube video that is not CC. Strugglehouse (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Holywriter7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader provides non-credible statements of own work:

  • One image is from 1945
  • Another is a newspaper clipping
  • Most uploads are clearly scanned.
  • The non-scans all have different camera models and resolutions.
  • One image appears to be taken from Facebook (source).

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, the uploader may not be the photographer. This is the subject's Twitter profile image.[4] It appears in a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[5] Appears in another news report attributed to "Gomantak Digital Team".[6] This has the appearance of an official portrait of this politician. The metadata indicates a Sony ILCE-7M3 camera (Sony α7 III), a mid-to-high-end DSLR which does not appear to have been used for other files from this user. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also delete the cropped version File:Carlos Alvares Ferreira 2022 (cropped).jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tsumyoki, for other files where the same uploader has claimed authorship. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is absolutely not an official portrait of the subject. Government of Goa doesn't use that background colour for their elected representatives, you can find their portraits available on their website. Also I use different cameras and not only stick to one to keep uploading different files here. Rejoy2003(talk) 08:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Plausable enough own work claim by uploader. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by SerChevalerie as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clear copyvio from subject's social media |source=https://www.instagram.com/p/CabiFyEp7kh/ Yann (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previously kept (see above), hence a regular DR is needed. Yann (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The social media argument was also used in the previous nomination ("This is the subject's Twitter profile image"). It was not enough of an argument to delete the file last time, so I don't see why it should be now. Nakonana (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by SerChevalerie as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clear copyvio from subject's social media |source=https://www.instagram.com/p/CabiFyEp7kh/ Yann (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source was previously kept in a DR, hence a regular DR is needed. Yann (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kia0088 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear state of license.  Delete

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 20:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abolhassan Banisadr portrait 1980.jpg File:Abolhassan Bani Sadr 1980.jpg is duplicate. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 20:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mjw1201 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: nonsense AI-generated images of military drones.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a clay pot. Omphalographer (talk) 20:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the copyright and I dont want to share it public anymore. Skarpedjup (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request Antonio1822 (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyrighted art by the Disney Corporation. Ooligan (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyrighted art by the Disney Corporation. Ooligan (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyrighted art. Ooligan (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyrighted art by the Disney Corporation. Ooligan (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blurred and illegible —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Justin. By author -SusanLesch (talk) 22:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too blurry to adequately identify the subject or be realistically useful for any educationally purpose. —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Justin. By author -22:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

not a recognizable person, unclear which Arshad Khan is depicted and doesn't seem to be made with consent Effeietsanders (talk) 22:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. @Effeietsanders: I fixed the reference to en:Arshad Khan (Canadian filmmaker).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an own work. 186.172.178.98 22:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was taken in 2022 by Jim or Dylan LaDue in the United States. Unless ineligible for copyright for some reason, photos taken in the United States since March 1, 1989 are protected by copyright from the instant they are taken.

It was uploaded to commons with the rationale that the photographer was an employee of the US federal government performing their duties, but without any evidence provided for this claim.

There is no claim that the image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

The uploader updated the rationale to that expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time: that the image is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either.

There are no grounds to think this is a free image. Rlandmann (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per @Rlandmann and precautionary principle. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Breached copyright - I did not have permission to share this image Brady.dyer (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung: Als Urheber wird die Stiftung Forum Recht angegeben, das ist aber nicht möglich, da Urheber immer nur eine natürliche Person , nicht aber eine Organisation sein kann

Obvious mislicensing: The Stiftung Forum Recht is stated as the author, but this is not possible, as the author can only ever be a natural person, not an organisation Lutheraner (talk) 23:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was taken in 2023 by Jessica Kellogg in the United States. Unless ineligible for copyright for some reason, photos taken in the United States since March 1, 1989 are protected by copyright from the instant they are taken.

It was uploaded to Commons with the rationale that the photographer was an employee of the US federal government performing their duties, but without any evidence provided for this claim.

There is no claim that the image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

The uploader updated the rationale to that expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time: that the image is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either.

There are no grounds to think this is a free image. Rlandmann (talk) 23:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



 Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is unclear and isn't taken properly. Garetty65 (talk) 23:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This photo isn't clear and has bad quality Garetty65 (talk) 23:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Sculpture date Sep 28, 1980. Nv8200p (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Sculpture date Sep 28, 1980. Nv8200p (talk) 23:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen descargada de internet Carlillasa (talk) 23:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen descargada de internet Carlillasa (talk) 23:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

foto descargada de internet Carlillasa (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of non-contributor Fenikals (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete COM:F10.
2A00:F41:2C6A:36CE:8D92:EEF0:2168:1714 06:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]