Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/08

7 September 2024

9 September 2024

Deletion requests on 8 September 2024

September 8

File:Anna Komnene writes the Alexiad at Kecharitomene.png

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 00:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I disagree that the topic is out of scope, this specific image doesn't really bring much to the table.--Leptictidium (talk) 06:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1496047156-ques.pdf

Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, vague source. Omphalographer (talk) 00:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Blankenfeld (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: plain text. These images are clearly screenshots of text, not original documents.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goncalo and Clinton.jpg

Low-resolution image with doubtful own work claim, especially considering the upload history of Special:Log/Ashrefavira. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vosler12 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious flags and parliament diagram.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balu bejgam sss sowmya-converted.pdf

Out of scope: strangely formatted printout of a user sandbox containing personal messages. Omphalographer (talk) 01:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandera de la Urss.jpg

Out of scope: not sure what this is a photo of, but it sure isn't a flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's obviously not own work- it was taken from https://www.olympedia.org/athletes/82247. Even Olympedia doesn't know when or where the photo was taken, or who took it. (But do we trust them to do due dilligence?) If it was taken in Hungary or Switzerland (her home country and the country of the Olympics were held in 1948), this could easily be protected. We have no evidence that this is an anonymous publication, only that Olympedia doesn't know the author. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It meets PD-EU and PD-Swiss, Tineye search over 50 billion images and found no one claiming an active copyright, and no information to contradict the circa 1948 date. --RAN (talk) 03:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A lack of Tineye results for an image means nothing. We know that the image has been published on Olympedia; the fact that Tineye doesn't show that just demonstrates how unreliable it can be. Omphalographer (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). I noticed you put the template on the image, claiming each of the following statements:

1)The photograph was published over 70 years ago.

2)The author's identity was not published alongside the photograph

3)The photo was
i)published in Switzerland AND

ii)over ago fifty years ago AND

ii)Switzerland courts would consider this non-creative enough to be copyrightable.

4)The photo was published circa 1948

Please prove them. Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The license only requires that there was "reasonable evidence". We generally rely on Occam's Razor, we accept the simplest explanation, doubt could be used to denigrate any image. For instance: Who took the picture? It must be the named photographer, right? What if the photographer was in the bathroom, and an assistant pressed the shutter release. What if the photographer's spouse pressed the shutter release while the photographer adjusted a light. What if a monkey entered the photo studio while the photographer, their spouse, and the photographer's assistant, were inattentive and the monkey pressed the shutter release. What if the camera was on a random timer, and no one was responsible for pressing the shutter release. --RAN (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) Okay. Please provide reasonable evidence that any of the above of true Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rogerrfontaine (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: plain text; original research.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As well as:

File:Reasoning behing Concept for Base 10 Calendar.pdf

Different account, but clearly the same person. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Merelokl (talk · contribs)

Fake license review by uploader. There is no indication of CC licensing.

0x0a (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Z5227494646617 05395d24887d2f92f2feb466507b8c87.jpg

The file seems to be taken from a CBS News video, but the file information summary says "Source: Own work". LightNightLights (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [edited LightNightLights (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)][reply]

(This is my first Commons deletion request, and I might not know info that other, more experienced, editors know about Commons, copyright, or deletion requests.) LightNightLights (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I don't think a US map with some states colored is above the ToO. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Z5227494646617 05395d24887d2f92f2feb466507b8c87.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Randomstaplers as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/super-tuesday-2024-presidential-election/%7Chelp=off ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see copyrightable content in the image. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree Yeah, but the design and drop-shadow... too risky. It would have been safer if it had been uploaded to Wikipedia for fair use instead.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I suspect there's an attribution violation somewhere. "Own work"?⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just fixed the attribution, but I don't think shadow and placement are copyrightable in this image either. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree And then there's the filename. "Z5227494646617 05395d24887d2f92f2feb466507b8c87.jpg".⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also point out this diff. That's pretty incriminating.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ooh, good catch. I've now added this information to the file description page. Not sure what to put into the "Author" field now. "CBS News"? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree After looking at the documentation again, it appears one could get away with saving this image as PD, as it falls below the TOO, but I'm still worried about that drop shadow. Also, if this file is to be saved, this file has to be renamed.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 03:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Appraisers.com - Map of the United States - May 2002.gif seems to be the go-to example.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 03:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We shouldn't need to pilfer these sorts of images from news web sites; we have our own map templates for marking up groups of states, like File:Blank US Map (states only).svg, and we can and should use one of those instead. Omphalographer (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak

Delete, not in use and can be easily recreated using SVG/higher resolution, in terms of copyright however, this is way below the TOO. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trump lion.jpg

I violated the rules in making this Randomuser795 (talk) 02:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไข่ไก่ต้ม.jpg

Unlikely own work, jpg of small resolution without metadata, all other images (of similar content) by uploader were copyvios: User talk:Phichet9707 Nutshinou ^Talk! 03:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Büşra ÖZCOŞKUN (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own works, jpgs of small resolution, all other uploads by uploader were clearly pulled from several places on the web: User talk:Büşra ÖZCOŞKUN

Nutshinou ^Talk! 03:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reformed.png

i would think this is beyond TOO for Sweden? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 03:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahalakshmi 1988 Shooting Parashuram movie.jpg

Copyright violation. Uploader has mirrored the image-frame from the actual music video of the movie: Song Thandana Thandana on Youtube (Mentioned is the exact timestamp, from which the mirrored screenshot is uploaded) --106.51.110.101 03:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nomination. No licensing information. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nivedita jain 1997 Nandi Hills.jpg

Copyright violation. 100% a screenshot of a media being played on a device. Cannot be the work of an external party other than that of film crew. -- 106.51.110.101 03:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.. Screenshot of copyrighted Youtube video (with timestamp): Song:‘Nagunagutha Bandavale’; Film:‘Baalida Mane’
Details: Baalida Mane (1997 Kannada film) --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 07:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gustavo the Image Flag (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kashishyoga1 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: personal certificates.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Saeedniko (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused images of plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zerker Sword.jpg

Out of scope: unused, unidentified video game screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vanitvasu-matha-shooting 2005.jpg

Copyright violation. Youtube screenshot of Kannada film:Mata (2006 film). Youtube video link with timestamp:[1] -- 106.51.110.101 03:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pratimaadevi shankar singh.jpg

Copyright violation. Youtube video screeshot of an interview: [2] -- 106.51.110.101 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HumanFlaccidPenis.jpg

COM:PENIS Эlcobbola _talk 23:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: literally just vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:HumanFlaccidPenis.jpg

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AUR Logo.svg

"Disagree with deletion. Vector shape of map of Romania I don't see as eligible for deletion." - ThecentreCZ Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a complex shape regardless. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No, it is not complex shape. This is few stars, 20 points-curved simple line of map of Romania and text font. You should not start requests anymore please. Some of these you've nominated and deleted have been already restored and you just added unecessary troubles. Thank you.--ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Because of the simple font, the simple stars and the shape of Romania. Welkend (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romania has no data on TOO, delete per COM:PCP. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CSSD Teillogo.svg

"Disagree with deletion of this file uploaded in 2012." -ThecentreCZ Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, still think the arrangement of shapes is original enough to put it above COM:TOO Czech Republic. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You are wrong. These are not unique. You've would question entire thousands of files with simple shape consensus. As I stated before, these are simple geometric shapes of

and 5 times

with one two pointed object. Cannot be seen as such. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The arrangement of the simple shapes may be "a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author" per my previous linked page. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These shapes can be arranged in multiple ways in a creative manner. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they can, according to previous assements, in this case this is simple case adequate to be on Commons is accordance with thousands of other logos. Not uniquely designed, on which treshold of originality can apply. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the other logos were kept because the TOO of the country of origin was high. I'm not sure if Czech has a high TOO, as a strict interpretation of the law can mean that this logo can be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm sorry, @Grandmaster Huon, but your perception of when something should be deleted does not match the TOO. Furthermore, a normal request for deletion of a file will also do. The fact that you are requesting quick deletions everywhere is not exactly useful. Welkend (talk) 17:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What TOO in question? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PM Imran Khan and Mahathir Mohamad Combine Press Conference SAMAA TV March 22, 2019.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guard of Honor for Prime Minister of Malaysia Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohamad At PM House.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PM Imran Khan receives Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad at Nur Khan Airbase.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PM Imran Khan and Malaysian PM Dr. Mahathir Mohamad Combine Speech at Dinner 22 March 2019.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PM Mahathir Mohamad Speech at Pakistan-Malaysia Business Conference 22 March 2019.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad at Reception Ceremony at President House in Islamabad.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PM Imran & Malaysian PM Mahathir joint press briefing SAMAA TV 04 February 2020.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad conferred with Pakistan’s highest civilian award Full-HD.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Humara dushman sirf Isreal hai - Mahathir Bin Mohamad SAMAA TV 22 March 2019.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pesanan Keselamatan Jalan Raya sempena Hari Raya Aidilfitri oleh YAB Tun Mahathir & YB Anthony Loke.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"UMNO Sudah Tidak Ada Lagi" - Kata Tun Mahathir Di Bicara Minda Sinar Harian Low.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sidang Parlimen 2019 - Jawapan Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad Terhadap Isu Pengecil.webm

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset reshoot.jpg

"Own work" seems extremely unlikely; looks like a bad reproduction of a frame from a film, with the aspect ratio wrong. Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sir,

I took this snap

Gangaasoonu (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album.

In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here

Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album. In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gangaasoonu: OK. Please see my remarks on the related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset.jpg. We might as well continue discussion in one place, if these are exactly parallel. - Jmabel ! talk 22:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per uploader's assertion of own work, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset reshoot.jpg

Copyright violation. Screenshot of Youtube video; video-link with timestamp: Song:‘Ide Nota Ide Aata’, Film:‘Ade Kannu’ (1985). Uploader even convinced many others by lying in a previous deletion-nomination (above) and has uploaded many similar screenshots. Requesting strict action against the uploader. --106.51.110.101 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Jmabel: , @P199: --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 05:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Traveling now, and I don't have time to look at this closely but, yes, if uploader was outright lying this calls for an indef block. If the video is reusing a still photo that they took, that could be another matter. - Jmabel ! talk 11:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible.. Its just a simple screenshot of a copyrighted Youtube video.. --106.51.110.101 06:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Chase From Above.jpg

Upload by a vandal. Does not show South Chase Wisconsin, likely not to be the work of the editor MtBotany (talk) 04:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The almighty Grubious totem pole.jpg

Non notible, added by vandal to the page Chase Wisconsin on English Wikipeida as a "joke" MtBotany (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack Pine bark in White Lake, Ontario..jpg

Does not potray what the uploader claims, along with other vandalism on en.wikipeida this should be deleted MtBotany (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset.jpg

"Own work" seems extremely unlikely; looks like a bad reproduction of a frame from a film, with the aspect ratio wrong. Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sir,

I took this snap

Gangaasoonu (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album.

In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here

Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gangaasoonu: OK. A question and a comment: (1) isn't this a bit distorted from the original photo? Might it be possible to do a better scan? (2) You probably would do well to specify that on the page, much like what I did at File:John M. Spargur.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 22:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Distorted, pardon me.I couldn't infer distortion in this image.

I have a huge cache/swathe of such old images & I'm using the older version of CamScanner (newer versions are banned in India) in 13 MegaPixel Back Camera of Lenovo K3 Note Mobile Phone, Saved to Gallery (sorry, if that sounded like an Attorney :( )

I'll use your tip,

In Source field of the Image, will mention "Photographed from earlier Yashica Camera Roll, Scanned using <Phone + Lineage Software>"

Probably, rather than blindly uploading the scanned images, I Gangaasoonu (talk) 04:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per uploader's assertion of own work, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset.jpg

Copyright violation. Screenshot of Youtube video; video-link with timestamp: Song:‘Ide Nota Ide Aata’, Film:‘Ade Kannu’ (1985). Uploader even convinced many others by lying in a previous deletion-nomination (above) and has uploaded many similar screenshots. Requesting strict action against the uploader. --106.51.110.101 04:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Jmabel: , @P199: --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 05:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm traveling, don't have time to check into this. If the uploader is lying, this calls for an indef-block. If the video is reusing a still photo that they took, that could be another matter. - Jmabel ! talk 11:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible.. Its just a simple screenshot of a copyrighted Youtube video.. --106.51.110.101 06:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack Pines in Stevens Point, WI.jpg

Does not potray what the uploader claims, along with other vandalism on en.wikipeida this should be deleted MtBotany (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MayankSC9 (talk · contribs)

AI generated image of a historical figure - nonsense characters, three different images of the same person that look completely different - should not be used in an encyclopedia or any respectable educational setting.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I would be surprised if there weren't some existing historical art of this person/event; that should be used instead of these randomly computer-generated images. Omphalographer (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of the free city of gdansk.png

Unused, low quality map. Out of COM:SCOPE The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalaa kesari Vasanth rao nakod during shooting Hoovu Hannu movie at madikeri.jpg

Copyright violation. The image is not taken by uploader during a film-shoot, but from an actual copyrighted film itself. Video-link from Youtube with timestamp: [3] --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 06:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:לראשונה התקין קאלי לינוקס.jpg

Spam + anonimity errosion of someone. זור987 (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:His name-Johnson Carter You were born in 1896 June 7 birth place-Naples Italy Died-1975 August 24 Died place brussels Belgium Cause of death assassinated cause to kill He went to a.jpeg

Out of scope: unused AI-generated "photo", filename suggests some sort of fiction or hoax. Omphalographer (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:יהונתן שקד.jpg

Spam + anonimity errosion of someone. זור987 (talk) 06:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KlaudeMan (talk · contribs)

Per website listed, photo is copyrighted by Time, with usage being "for personal non-commercial use only"

reppop^talk 06:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh lol, I didn’t realize could you send me the link? KlaudeMan (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reppop I apologize could you delete these images immediately they are in fact copyrighted. KlaudeMan (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KlaudeMan (talk · contribs)

These two images were previously deleted as they didn't show that it was out of copyright as photographer Wally McNamee died in 2017. Reuploaded with the template {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but there's currently no indication that it was published in the first place. this collection of his works states that "McNamee retains copyright to his images".

reppop^talk 16:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search online on the records, pre march 1989 images needed to be copyrighted but if you search on the records no indication of copyright is made. KlaudeMan (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reppop Please remove the notice of deletion, just search the copyright records the image is in the public domain KlaudeMan (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-US-1978-89}} directly states: "published in the United States between 1978 and March 1, 1989 without a copyright notice", and there is no indication that it was published (as I said). If you can give me where it was published, and that it didn't have a copyright notice there, I'll withdraw it as it would show that it wasn't copyrighted and not registered. reppop^talk 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: echoed the same thing in your undeletion request for one of the images deleted. reppop^talk 18:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jayamala kannada-bhavana.jpg

Copyright violation. Image has appeared in muliple Youtube videos: (@0.08 sec), [4] (:with timestamp) --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 06:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Často vyobrazován bůh Pilius.webp

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a deity; associated article cs:Pili náboženství was speedily deleted. Omphalographer (talk) 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:112096 beit kama aerial photograph PikiWiki Israel.jpg

This photo is from 2008, how is this public? Poliocretes (talk) 06:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PaulBernNote.JPG

While the text of the note may have been published, bibliographically speaking, in newspapers in 1932, with or without a copyright notice, for US copyright purposes publication (general publication) can only happen if authorised by the author. Any contemporary newspapers publishing this text would have done so as fair use, not because the suicide note was somehow public domain or, even more ridiculously, licensed under a compatible free license. In order to ascertain the note's copyright term we need to know when the first authorized publication happened, which, absent evidence to the contrary may have been "never"—it is entirely possible that all subsequent publications have been on similar fair use grounds—or may have happened at any point in the intervening years (if the estate or heirs granted permission to someone writing a book about the affair, say).

Since it is pretty much impossible to prove that it was never published with permission before 2003 (when {{PD-US-unpublished}} would come into play), we must assume per COM:PRP that publication with permission happened somewhere in the time window where a pub. +95 term applies (if publication was late enough that the term was pma. 70 it would have long since expired).

The best bet for anyone wanting to try to save this file is to trawl through the oldest books about this topic looking for one giving the full text of the note and mentioning in the text somewhere that they have the permission of the heirs (even indirectly in the form of thanking them for assistance or graciously permitting etc.). If found it may be reasonable to conclude that first publication happened no later than that time and copyright expires 95 years after that book was published, or it could be that that book either lacked a copyright notice or failed to renew copyright in the 28th year after publication.

Note that the file is in use on many Wikipedias and several of them may have EDPs permitting fair use material ala. enWP. Before deleting these should be notified and given the opportunity to import the file locally if desired and permitted by their policy. Xover (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You disregard the very valid {{PD-US-unpublished}} option as "Since it is pretty much impossible to prove that it was never published with permission before 2003". It is just as impossible to prove that it was published with explicit permission. (If it was widely published without anything being done againest it by the heirs, I'd count that as implicit permission to have it published). PCP good & fine, but this arguing about a 92 year old low res one-sentence long suicide scribbeling is copyright paranoia. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. You can positively prove that it has been published any number of ways. A prime example, a book that publishes it and says it is used by permission of the heirs (which is a very common practice). But as I also mentioned, you could even just make it plausible that this has happened by finding a book where the heirs have in some way participated, for example by the author thanking them for assistance or similar, without making the permission explicit. The opposite is true for proving it was never published, simply because you cannot prove a negative. Failing to find a publication does not mean there isn't one, just that you failed to find it.

And copyright owners failing to act in some way has never been a valid argument. The heirs could have failed to act for any number of reasons, lack of awareness being one obvious possibility, and unlike trademarks this affects their rights not one bit. But more to the point, the contemporary publications were in newspapers and were reporting on current events. That is, they were publishing it under the fair use doctrine (an affirmative defence against a claim of copyright infringement which does not apply to Commons and is explicitly not permitted under Commons policy). There was essentially nothing the heirs could have done to prevent this.

So… In order to preserve this you'd need to find a publication that is 1) plausibly the first (general) publication, and 2) that failed to comply with the required formalities (notice, renewal, etc.). Xover (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PCP requires "significant doubt" (emphasis original). What I see here are vague claims that the publication might not be authorized, or it might have been authorized, but too recent, or it might not have been at all. And any of this might be a problem. I think that's far from significant doubt.

The file in question is either {{PD-US-no notice}}, or {{PD-US-unpublished}}. If we're not sure, we can add both tags.

And the purely hypothetical case that the heirs -zero clue who they are- have somehow agreed the "publication" of a 1932 suicide note between 1977-2003? This goes wayyy beyond any reasonable research, and it is up to you to prove that.

And that this would somehow reset the copyright clock, are there any cases to look at? (Copyrighting someone's 92 year old suicide note.........)

Either way, some more input is certainly needed here. ~TheImaCow (talk) 01:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mvraajamma.jpg

Copyright violation. Screenshot of a copyrighted film scene in Youtube: Video link with timestamp --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 07:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Contemporary Art Museum (North Macedonia)

No FOP in North Macedonia for 2D works.

Quick1984 (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toyota Camry TDL-7059 right side on Tingzhou Road 20240907.jpg

Advertising artwork on vehicle side is of recent origin. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NTNU Store, Fat Daddy American Fried Chicken 20190216.jpg

Advertising poster of recent origin. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:First prize, Dead or Alive Xtreme 2 swimsuit cosplay championship 20240907.jpg

3D sculpture , Tawian has FoP for buildings only. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Central Broadcasting System logo on Changsha Street 20240907.jpg

Commerical logo , Tawian has FoP for architecture and buildings only. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oshi no Ko taxi head 20240810a.jpg

Essentially a 2D artwork on a vehicle , Taiwan has FoP only for architecture. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Itasha. Solomon203 (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damien Charls Weber.jpg

I don't know if this complies with Commons policies or not, but just to say that this image is intended to disparage the subject, and was uploaded in connection with an attack page on the same. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you define it as an attack page when it gives fact with references? 2601:647:5A00:4150:194A:551E:DBD5:A4A 08:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DoubleGrazing,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I did not intend for the page to be perceived as an attack, and I apologize if it came across that way. My goal was to document the allegations and controversies surrounding Damien Charles Weber in a factual and neutral manner, citing reliable sources.

I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies, especially regarding neutrality and biographies of living persons. I will review the content and revise the language to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia’s guidelines on maintaining a balanced and non-disparaging tone. I am open to collaborating on any changes necessary to bring the page into compliance.

Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to resolving this issue constructively.

Best regards, 2601:647:5A00:4150:194A:551E:DBD5:A4A 08:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete G3 - vandalism, if not it is obviously out of project scope. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1st TTV Baby on TTV OB BP-366 left 20100608.jpg

Commerical logo/2D art - Tawian has FOP for architecure/buildings only. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taking TRA trains with Taiwan Easy Go.jpg

Commerical 2D art, Tawian only has FoP for buildings/architecture. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dum Dum Head Post office.jpg

Not clear Soumava2002 (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Hsien Loong on the 9th Singapore-Malaysia Leaders' Retreat.jpg

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahathir Mohamad and Moon Jae-In.jpg

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aadawani lakshmidevi.jpg

Copyright violation. Clearly a screenshot of a copyrighted film being played on a media-device. Uploader has 100% record of copyright violations on screenshot-upolads, please see uploader's talkpage.

Uploader has done things like:

uploading mirror screenshot image for escaping copyvio: [5]
uploading copyrighted-screenshot images from Youtube by mentioning them as taken during film-shooting. [6], [7], [8], [9]
uploading copyrighted Youtube interviews as his/her own works: [10]
deceiving surveillance by saying the images were taken by his/her old camera devices, but which are actually a simple Youtube screenshots of copyrighted films: [11], [12]

Its 100% confirm that the uploader has faked a permission email to clear permission-status.

You can see the image in Youtube: Video link, Thumbnail of video The image is of a film-scene being captured by film-crew's camera.

--2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murals in Shaw.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John's Church at 16th and H Street BLM.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Van Nelle tobacco packs

Derivatives, COM:PACKAGING.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Значок комсомола маленький.jpg

Derivative, copyright status of the original artwork is not specified. Quick1984 (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:5-й Новоостанкинский проезд.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artist Misha Most.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yujing Circle, as taken on 10 October 2021.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Night view of Yujing Circle, as taken on 1st October 2020.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:7-Eleven store and bus station at Yujing Circle, as taken on 10 October 2021.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Badges of Komsomol

Derivatives, copyright status of the original artworks is not specified.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savvy and Wacoal lingerie shop at the intersection of Nantun Road at night.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savvy and Wacoal lingerie shop in Nantun District, Taichung at night.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marigot Art Mural (6546061899).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Saint-Martin (France) A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olive Morris Mural by Breeze Yoko.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trompe-l'oeil @ Faverges (51403264920).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mosaic by Rokuro Taniuchi @ Harajuku (8973971262).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:StrummerNY.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe stummer fresque.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:London - Brixton Arches (3).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Japan - Tokyo (9979157184).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dubai Marina waterfront with Emaar high rises.jpg

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masjid Adnan Abdulmalik in Bahrain Bay, Bahrain.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exterior of the Cathedral of Our Lady of Arabia in Awali, Bahrain at night - 2024.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Non copyrighted drone shots of Tope Mankiala Stupa — Rawalpindi — Mahatma Budha — Nazish.webm

Same file already exists (File:Non copyrighted drone shots of Tope Mankiala Stupa - Rawalpindi - Mahatma Budha - Nazish.webm) and has all information about it available. Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It already is tagged for speedy deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ベビーカーおきば (7572433704).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ero Lanscape.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akihabara Landscape (2243476989).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbeiderpartiet logo (hvit).svg

I appeal the nomination for speedy deletion due to copyright. This file is clearly above COM:TO for protection. Lots of the non-copyrightable examples have simple shapes in a similar or more complicated arrangement. Ved havet (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But this can vary depending on country. This logo can definitely be copyrighted in UK or France. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

British and French copyright law is completely irrelevant to the logo of a Norwegian political party, hosted on the American Wikimedia Commons service. Ved havet (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But in order for the file to be hosted, it must be both free in the United States and its home country. The flower of this logo is more complex than the hat in the logo of the TV series Jul i Blåfjell, which is copyrighted in Norway. Thus

Delete per COM:PCP. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dum Dum Head Post Office.jpg

Not clear Soumava2002 (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abklklkl.png

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Religion star.png

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corona-christmas battle.png

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbeiderpartiet logo.svg

I appeal the nomination for speedy deletion due to copyright. This file is clearly above COM:TO for protection. Lots of the non-copyrightable examples have simple shapes in a similar or more complicated arrangement. Ved havet (talk) 09:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byzantine Constantinople-el-2015.png

Needless lower quality/resolution duplicate (also uploaded at a later date than the original) of File:Byzantine Constantinople-el.svg. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Η Κωνσταντινούπολη κατά τη βυζαντινή περίοδο.svg

Needless duplicate (also uploaded at a later date than the original) of File:Byzantine Constantinople-el.svg. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 09:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitchell Morton - Entry Education.jpg

The very last of this user's uploads not to be nominated for deletion or tagged as copyvio. This photo gives off the same copyvio vibes as those expressed in these DRs: 1, 2, 3. As for the PS in general, this photo doesn't really add anyhthing "educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject" and is low res. Sinigh (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.png

Duplicate of File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg Wheatley2 (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Kuban.png

Lower quality version of File:Flag of Kuban.svg and File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg Wheatley2 (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Kuban.PNG

Duplicate of File:Flag of Kuban.svg and File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg Wheatley2 (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Use {{Duplicate}} or {{Vector version available}} templates instead of deletion request. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kuban People's Republic flag.png

Duplicate of the File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg, one of two (or more) copies of the flag made by this user. Wheatley2 (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Syrian President Hafez al Assad.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posters and bunting of 2014 Syrian presidential election in Damascus (1).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Views of Iraqi Parliamentary Election posters (2018) in Shaqlawa.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Iraq A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IraqPolice Dschalal Talabani and Dschawad al-Maliki.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IranIntersection.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaghayegh Cyrous giving a speech at In Honor of....jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:F5 Ruskin Heights, Missouri tornado in Kansas 1957.jpg

The uploader sourced this file from the website of the US National Weather Service: https://www.weather.gov/eax/RuskinHeights where it's been hosted since at least 2016.

Per the source the photo was taken by Reverend Robert Alexander from the Methodist parsonage at Spring Hill, Kansas, in 1957, and that the photo came to the NWS via Tim Janicke of the Kansas City Star. A Rev. Robert Alexander died at the Methodist church in nearby Wellsville in 1971, aged 69,[13] who might plausibly have been the photographer.

The rationale for hosting it on the Commons has been:

a belief when the NWS general website disclaimer states that information on there site is "in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise" it necessarily means noted with a formal copyright notice, and that the absence of a formal notice accompanying an image equates to an assertion by the NWS that the image is in the public domain.
a set of terms and conditions used for a time by the NWS Sioux City office for public contributions

However:

There is nothing to connect this image with the Sioux City office (it was published by the Kansas City office)
A recent analysis of over 200 third-party images has found that whatever the NWS intends by "specifically noted otherwise" in their disclaimer, images that are known to be protected by copyright are routinely published on NWS websites without formal copyright notices, or sometimes without any attribution at all. Very many examples exist, spanning major media outlets, photographers who claim that they never relinquished their rights to their photos, and permissions granted to the NWS in public that did not include release into the public domain. Not a single one of these was published by the NWS with a formal copyright notice.

The most likely conclusion is that the NWS does not intend "specifically noted otherwise" to mean "specifically noted with a formal copyright notice". Alternatively, if that really is the intention of those words, the NWS has deviated from this intention so thoroughly as to render the disclaimer unreliable as an assertion of public domain status.

Copyright of images taken in the United States prior to March 1, 1989 depends on the circumstances of their first publication, rather than when they were actually taken. (see COM:HIRTLE).

This image might already have entered the public domain if it were first published before 1989 without meeting all the requirements for protection, but this cannot simply be assumed. Alternatively, for example, if it was first published in a book somewhere between 1957 and 1977 (and the formalities were correctly carried out), it will enter the public domain somewhere between 2053 and 2073. Or if the Rev Robert Alexander who died in 1971 was indeed the photographer and the photo was never published before 1989, then it will pass into the public domain in 2042, 70 years after his death.

I have searched The Kansas City Star's coverage of this tornado in the days following the event via newspapers.com but have been unable to find this photo. I tentatively conclude that they didn't have it at the time and the KCS connection must have come later.

Without details of its first publication, we cannot assess the copyright status of this per-1989 US image and therefore must delete it unless someone can provide this information.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 12:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep For the following reasons (long post…sorry):

The image originates from this web site by the National Weather Service (NWS). The NWS noted the following caption with the photo: "Tornado near Spring Hill, Kansas. Original photograph taken from the north porch of the parsonage of the Methodist Church. Photographer looking north. Photograph has been cosmetically enhanced. As the storm strikes the small town of Spring Hill, Kansas, four members of the Isham Davis family were killed. Photo courtesy of Tim Janicke, Kansas City Star. Photographed by Reverend Robert Alexander.". Per the disclaimer linked at the bottom on the webpage, "The information on National Weather Service Web servers and Web sites is in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public." We have confirmed evidence this image exists on a web site as well as the web servers of the National Weather Service (weather.gov).
For the clause of “specifically annotated otherwise”, NWS either allows the user to add a copyright “©” watermark to the image {as seen in this image, hosted on this NWS webpage} or by directly adding a copyright statement using “©” {as seen on this NWS webpage: difference between the “Tornado Photos” and “Damage” tabs}. That disclaimer is linked at the bottom of all three of the NWS webpages linked above (this image’s webpage + 2 I used as examples). To me, “specifically annotated otherwise” indicates a direct copyright (©) statement or watermark.
The NWS disclaimer also states, "Third-party information and imagery are used under license by the individual third-party provider. [...] Please contact the third-party provider for information on your rights to further use these data/products." See instances of usage below:

MissouriLife used the photo in this article where it is attributed “National Weather Service”.
The city government of Spring Hill, Kansas used the photo with no attribution in this post on Facebook.
The Kansas State Mesonet used the photo with no attribution in this post on X. To note, the Kansas State Mesonet is operated by Kansas State University.
The National Weather Service office of Omaha/Valley, Nebraska used the photo with no attribution in this post on Facebook. This is included as the NWS webpage with the image was from the NWS office in Kansas City/Pleasant Hill, MO.
WDAF used the photo with no attribution in this post on Facebook.
KEY: Martin City, Missouri, a city largely destroyed by this specific tornado, uses the photo on its own city history website, where it is attributed with the caption: “Actual photo of the ‘Ruskin Heights Tornado’ approaching Martin City from the direction of Spring Hill Kansas. Courtesy: National Weather Service”.
KMBC used the photo in this article from 2020 where it is credited “Rev. Robert Alexander”. The article cites the U.S. Weather Bureau throughout the article (not for the photo). Mr. Alexander was already dead at the time of this article, so copyright for the image physically could not have been given, indicating it is free-to-use.

To me, all the things above point to this image being in the public domain. So, I vote to Keep this photograph as it seems clear the U.S. government, local city governments, universities, and RS media indicate there is no copyright on the photograph. WeatherWriter (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 01:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamiyunokawacho, Hakodate, Hokkaido Prefecture 042-0914, Japan - panoramio (4).jpg

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Тернопіль, Старий Парк, Пам'ятник Герою Радянського Союзу Миколі Пігорєву.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1980. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. see same request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bust of Mykola Pigorev in Ternopil Микола Василечко (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Хакодате - panoramio.jpg

Copyrighted magazine covers and light boxes in Japan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Γιωργος μαστορασ.png

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 10:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Тернопіль, Старий Парк, Пам'ятник Герою Радянського Союзу Вікторові Чалдаєву.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1980. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. see same request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bust of Viktor Chaldaev in Ternopil Микола Василечко (talk) 10:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colorful bags of sweets of Hakodate; April 2016.jpeg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Keetanii

These images were all uploaded by myself User:Keetanii about 12 years ago. I believe they should now be deleted because they're of poor quality (literally scanned copies of printed photos (not digital)) and there are better photos that do the same job available on Wikimedia Commons. Keetanii (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a number are in use Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مصطفى احمد الصحفي.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:احمد زبادي.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Czech Social Democratic Party (1998–2021).svg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo and ThecentreCZ wrote "Disagree with deletion." in incomplete special:diff/920781845. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Grandmaster Huon. The uploader claimed to be the copyright holder of a copyrightable work in this edit. The file is over COM:TOO Czechia. Yet, they stole it from Česká strana sociálně demokratická (ČSSD).^[1]^[2] — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per Jeff G. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Keep No, this is in my view not over COM:TOO Czech. Jeff G., you claims are absolutely not correct, sourcing of the logo was added immadiatelly 10 minutes after original upload to fulfill description of the file. You define stating original sourcing file as "stealing" is absolutely not a proper dictionary. Licensing original and derived file were already part of some discussions, and it was concluded that statement of it in the permisson column is acceptable as sources are given too. Please follow discussion at sourced file uploaded 8 years ago from German Wikipedia, seem as in-accordance with PD-Czech at here Commons:Deletion requests/File:CSSD Teillogo.svg. We were discussing this also with @Yann: gratitude for your assesments. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThecentreCZ (talk • contribs) 16:30, 8 September 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

File:بورتريه.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 11:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:جامعة النور.jpg

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 11:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:جامعة النور 2.jpg

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 11:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by LordBirdWord (talk · contribs)

Unable to confirm the source, all images are credited to George Micro YouTube videos which do not, twelve hours after these images were uploaded, exist.

Copyright concerns per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with @GeorgeMicro1, where George Micro appeared to be posting stills of candidates' social media footage to Twitter and incorrectly claiming them to be photos that he had personally taken. This may be the same thing but on YouTube.

Belbury (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the video exists. It has YouTube BY-CC Marked. What’s the problem? And also, why is Tony Jones image in here? It’s not even apart of the Debate2024. The debate would’ve been copyright claimed if none of the content was original. LordBirdWord (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the video? The URL source given for all four of these images goes to a This page isn't available. Sorry about that. YouTube 404 page.

My mistake on the Tony Jones image, I see you're crediting it to the New Era Party of Florida rather to George Micro. But the YouTube link you provide for that file's source is still a 404 page. Belbury (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m terribly sorry. Is there an email I can send the links too? I tried sending them through here but the message wouldn’t send. LordBirdWord (talk) 23:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Langosta5.jpg

Low-quality photo of an unidentified (and, probably, unidentifiable) crustacean. No realistic educational use -> out of scope. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edinburgh Royal Infirmary

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery pages

Unnecessary directory of gallery page categories, since you browse Commons categories more often than galleries. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crystal Lake, Illinois, Holter home foundation.png

The uploader sourced this file from the website of the US National Weather Service: https://www.weather.gov/lot/Palm_Sunday_Outbreak where it's been hosted since 2015 without attribution

The Crystal Lake Historical Society identifies it as the work of local photographer Jim Seymour (d.1988[14]) It is one of a batch of 21 photographic prints that was donated to the society in 2000. The Society is unaware of any prior publication.

The Society has featured Seymour's photos of the tornado aftermath in a slideshow on its website since at least 2010, although due to a technology change, it's not possible to verify with complete certainty that this photo was among them. Nevertheless, the physical print in the Society's collection is the only original source known and documented for this image.

The tornado took place in the United States in 1965

The rationale for hosting it on the Commons has been:

a belief when the NWS general website disclaimer states that information on the site is "in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise" it necessarily means noted with a formal copyright notice, and that the absence of a formal notice accompanying an image equates to an assertion by the NWS that the image is in the public domain.
a set of terms and conditions used for a time by the NWS Sioux City office for public contributions

However:

There is nothing to connect this image with the Sioux City office (it was published by the Chicago office)
A recent analysis of over 200 third-party images has found that whatever the NWS intends by "specifically noted otherwise" in their disclaimer, images that are known to be protected by copyright are routinely published on NWS websites without formal copyright notices, or sometimes without any attribution at all. Very many examples exist, spanning major media outlets, photographers who claim that they never relinquished their rights to their photos, and permissions granted to the NWS in public that did not include release into the public domain. Not a single one of these examples was published by the NWS with a formal copyright notice.

The most likely conclusion is that the NWS does not intend "specifically noted otherwise" to mean "specifically noted with a formal copyright notice". Alternatively, if that really is the intention of those words, the NWS has deviated from this intention so thoroughly as to render the disclaimer unreliable as an assertion of public domain status.

Copyright of images taken in the United States prior to March 1, 1989 depends on the circumstances of their first publication, rather than when they were actually taken. (see COM:HIRTLE).

This image might already have entered the public domain if it were first published before 1989 without meeting all the requirements for protection, but this cannot simply be assumed. Alternatively, for example, if it was first published in a book somewhere between 1965 and 1977 (and the formalities were correctly carried out), it will enter the public domain somewhere between 2061 and 2073. Or if the photo was never published before 1989, then it will pass into the public domain in 2059, 70 years after Seymour's death.

Without details of its first publication, we cannot assess the copyright status of this pre-1989 US image and therefore must delete it unless someone can provide this information.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 12:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 12:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodos - panoramio (7).jpg

per en:Armando Bernabiti, this is a work by architect Armando Bernabiti who died in 1970, so still protected until 2040, and there is no suitable freedom of panorama in Greece. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Art Deco Aquarium - Rhodes Town - panoramio.jpg

per en:Armando Bernabiti, this is a work by architect Armando Bernabiti who died in 1970, so still protected until 2040, and there is no suitable freedom of panorama in Greece. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul-André Robert, Calopetryx splendens - Gebänderte Prachtlibelle.jpg

Paul-André Robert died in 1977, so this painting is protected by copyright in Switzerland until 2047 (70 years after the creator's death). If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to the painting (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and release it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marie-Françoise Robert, Metamorphosen VII.jpg

Marie-Françoise Robert is a living artist, so her works are protected by copyright. If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to this works (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and releases it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marie-Françoise Robert, Metamorphosen VII (cropped).jpg

Marie-Françoise Robert is a living artist, so her works are protected by copyright. If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to this works (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and releases it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan R. Zuidema - Lezing Cultuur.pdf

Is this allowed? Isn't this a copyricht violation? DirkVE (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Out of scope as plain text regardless. Omphalographer (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Ulvi Guliyev

This is basically the exact same photograph of some politician from Azerbaijan it seems, uploaded by two different users years apart, both claiming own work and both having very little uploads. I think we need VRT to keep these files, or one of them.

Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:City of Military Glory (Tver)

Derivatives of modern 3D artworks, no FoP in Russia for these.

Quick1984 (talk) 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Медаль "Надежда Кузбасса".jpg

Non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from third-party website. Рhotographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 12:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 永樂街 Wing Lok Street shop Best Mart 優品360° goods March 2020 SS2 02.jpg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 永樂街 Wing Lok Street shop Best Mart 優品360° goods March 2020 SS2 04.jpg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 德輔道西 Des Voeux Road West shop Sunday March 2020 SS2 02.jpg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 德輔道西 Des Voeux Road West shop Sunday March 2020 SS2 03.jpg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK 中環 Central 德輔道中 Des Voeux Road Central shop SIM cards March 2020 SS2 01.jpg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bereal screenshot post.jpg

pricacy person portrayed in this screenshot - person noted https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BeReal&curid=5731627&diff=68084182&oldid=67670705 to be the person in this image and does not want to be publically exposed Hoyanova (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Pala Empire under Devapala.png

The map is highly exaggerated AlvaKedak (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map is contradicted by the sources it cites, like Kamboja for instance, Chakrabarti in the exact same page that @Based Kashmiri cited, said," the inscriptional claim of Devapala’s subjugation of the Kambojas in the northwest is an exaggeration because the Sahi rulers were then very powerful in Punjab and the northwestern province." So clearly the creator does not know what they are talking about. AlvaKedak (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose “Chakrabarti in the exact same page that @Based Kashmiri cited, said," the inscriptional claim of Devapala’s subjugation of the Kambojas in the northwest is an exaggeration because the Sahi rulers were then very powerful in Punjab and the northwestern province." So clearly the creator does not know what they are talking about.”
No? Shah Sufi Mostafizur Rahman & Dilip K. Chakrabarti has states that A. M. Chowdhury believes that subjugation of the Kambojas may be exaggeration. However the both of them have rejected A. M. Chowdhury's theory in the next page and states We also find no difficulty in accepting the idea of a Pala raid in the Kamboja land in the northwest. and they also mentions and accept the subjugation of the Kambojas in the previous page. (See page no: 75 (Chakrabarti; Oxford), 51 (Rahman; Archeological Department) Based Kashmiri (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The AfD request is filed by an long term sockpuppet who has been personal attacking me and creating disruptive edits in multiple wiki projects. Please see [15] and [16] Based Kashmiri (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DRÖNARE.jpg

This photo is taken from Rix FM's Facebook page (aka the radio channel organising this). Kakan spelar (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Effects of Religious Cults on the Health and Welfare of Their Converts

This is not a gallery page: with only one file. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. The text has been copied to the file. JopkeB (talk) 14:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ΜΝΗΜΕΙΟ ΠΕΣΟΝΤΩΝ.jpg

Way too recent as a work of art in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stemma ChievoVerona 1993-2001.png

Although COM:TOO Italy is high, the knight is not a simple geometric shape. Permission from Chievo Verona is required. Arrow303 (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in the Igbo Wikimedians Community

This template page is created in error Iwuala Lucy (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandera de el Departamento de La Unión, El Salvador.png

No Es El Original OrlandoWKD503 (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Stones Man City 2024.jpg

Probably copyvio. Uploader has stated that Pinterest as the source, no metadata. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Widerstandsgruppe Anton Haller Schusterwerkstatt in Hall in Tirol.jpg

Scan from a book or magazine, need permission for the original photo via COM:VRT Wdwd (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macedonia-3a-ohrid (5874312675).jpg

even though the image might be published under a free license on Flickr, the original postcard (modern, 21th century postcard of North Macedonia) is for sure copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardcounter Simulator.png

Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Expectations before the game starts.jpg

Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gained when the game ended.jpg

Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Πέτρα ,ήλιος ,θάλασσα .jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since).

I really see no reason to doubt the uploader's “own work” here.

Comment This also affects other images by that uploader that have been tagged Εὐθυμένης. Msb (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mosbatho: No Metadata or EXIF data is available to sustain the "own work" claim here. And the upload date of the said file(s) seems to be a quite recent one in order to claim that the technology wasn't that advanced back then, at the time of the original upload or of the photo shoot/take. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 16:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that an image file has no EXIF data can sometimes indicate a copyvio under certain circumstances, but definately not in this case. Oftenly, the EXIF info is automatically removed by certain programs/apps automatically, or the user has selected settings that remove EXIFs by default.

In the case of this photo, IMO it is more than obvious that it was probably taken using an older digicam or smartphone - no problem at all. The image quality is accordingly. Furthermore, the image was claimed as “own work” from the beginning by the uploader (no reason to doubt that) and there is really no proof, not even an indication, that copyvio can even begin to substantiate. Msb (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mosbatho: Unfortunately, this has been proven multiple times on Commons, that uploaders tend to claim an image/file as "own work" despite it being not. 😕🤷‍♂️ Does this apply to every single case, though? Well, not necessarily... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 17:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The EXIF issue is well known. But once again: the lack of EXIF information is not automatically a copyright problem. Be aware of that, please. Msb (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adriano Dayot Hernández National Historical Commission Marker.jpg

Source indicates that the photo was uploaded from Facebook but there's no indication that this was released under a Commons-acceptable license seav (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of us.jpg

Duplicate and low quality JPG. --StomboyCarGeek (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shahr-e Pir Time lapse.ogg

files in Category:Videos featuring unidentified music need to have their music identified or be deleted / get their audio removed. Somebody please do so. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Хан Крум

User:Εὐθυμένης had asked for a speedy deletion for this gallery page, but I do not see why. So please give a reason and we can discuss it. JopkeB (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JopkeB: The said page/gallery doesn't seem to follow the overall guidelines that seem to be applied to such type of content pages. Be it for the title or the content. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 16:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What exact guideline is this gallery page not following? In what aspect does it fail? JopkeB (talk) 05:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the United States 24x12.png

Duplicate. StomboyCarGeek (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rgb-multiverse.png

Non-free screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orce Nikolov.odmoralishte (5874312893).jpg

postcard from the 1970s +/- is copyright protecterd Albinfo (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rgb-metaverse-gym.png

Non-free screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Originalslika-1973 (5874313253).jpg

Postcard of 1973 is copytight protected Albinfo (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:URAS ♥ ECRİN.png

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Razglednica-Makedonija-Ohrid-stari-deo-grada-1969 slika O 313031 (5874869428).jpg

most probably a copyright protected postcard Albinfo (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Razglednica-Ohrid-1966 slika O 313388 (5874869888).jpg

1966 postcard of Yougoslavia is most probably copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Razglednica-Ohrid-1966 slika O 313468 (5874309835).jpg

1966 postcard of Yougoslavia is most probably copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Razglednica-Ohrid-crkva-osamdesetih slika O 313535 (5874869096).jpg

late 1960s postcard of Yougoslavia is most probably copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FOXD713 1440-1024x1024.jpg

no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BigBadShakin Presse 2019.jpg

no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CGI Showreels HD -- 2015 ” Texturing - LookDev - Lighting - Compositing” - by Florian Magnin.webm

what is the music used here? If it's not CCBY the file needs to be deleted or the audio get muted. Somebody please do so. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince William of Wales autograph.svg

Per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom and Commons:Deletion requests/PD ineligible signatures. DrKay (talk) 16:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Beatles mural in Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovskaya Oblast, RU.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yekaterinburg (16295782234).jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Το καστρο.JPG

The photo here claims to be representing a castle, however, maybe due to low visibility, I can't really see any castle. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 16:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tree Bird Hedgehog Studio.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Organization of the logo really is a non-notable institution. This file is not in use,

Delete. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rīgas Okupācijas muzejs - panoramio.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riga 31 (33467779521).jpg

No FoP in Latvia, artist Valdis Albergas died in 1984 A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pati vecriga - panoramio.jpg

No FoP in Latvia, artist Valdis Albergas died in 1984 A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotman Paris Advocate Building - panoramio.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Hellas bricks.jpg

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 17:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:M R Campiotti 20x30.jpg

Copyviol from https://www.diocesivolterra.it/s-e-mons-roberto-campiotti/ . Antonio1952 (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stemma Campiotti.jpg

Copyviol from https://www.diocesivolterra.it/s-e-mons-roberto-campiotti/lo-stemma/ . Antonio1952 (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rainis monument.Riga (38056590024).jpg

The monument was completed in 1965 by Laimonis Blumbergs (1919–2014) and Aivars Gulbis (1933–). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, permission from the artists is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHsxc 7WwAA2278.jpg

Low quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gage_into_the_Sky_(18891263491).jpg QuincyMorgan (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courtney Taylor Taylor and David Bowie at Meltdown Festival 2002.jpg

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ellidette (talk · contribs)

not own work and above COM:TOO UK, which is very low

Yeeno (talk) 18:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Faribamomeni79 (talk · contribs)

Personal photos for article in enwiki (article was deleted as Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

Killarnee (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gun Ownership vs Homicide Rate.png

Very low-quality statistical graph, data source is much too vague to verify. Not realistically useful for any educational purpose. Apocheir (talk) 18:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A "correlation" with

R^{2}=0.001

is no correlation at all; it's misleading to even draw the line on the graph. Omphalographer (talk) 05:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISS060-E-11736 - View of Earth.jpg

not useful Mateus2019 (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ΚΑΒΒΑΔΙΑΣ23Α15.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted text material title ("ΕΚ ΤΩΝ ΕΝ ΕΠΙΔΑΪΡΙΑ ΑΝΑΣΚΑΦΩΝ.") and subsequent cursory google search seems to indicate book is PD —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 18:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Без назви.xcf

Unidentifiable diagram in an unusual format. Unused. Apocheir (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:St.Paul Poznan interior.JPG

Wnętrze kościoła zbudowane w latach 90. XX wieku, jako takie chronione prawem autorskim. Teukros (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embassy of India, Addis Ababa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Falls under {{GODL-India}} if explicit source is found —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 19:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embassy of India, Kabul.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. caption on NDTV says "Image posted on Facebook by India in Afghanistan (Embassy of India, Kabul)" so it's likely to fall under {{GODL-India}} —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 19:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Näverkärr.jpg

Private image LevandeMänniska (talk), 19:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enregistrement Au-Delà.jpg

Possible copyvio: A copyright appears in the metadata, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:OIP (1) (1).png

There is no evidence that this logo was created by someone who has been dead for over 70 years. The Wanderers club active between 1859 and the 1880s never used this logo. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CORRADO UGHETTI.jpg

Non-notable person, not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in it.wiki. Uploader claimed it to be a selfie – does not look like that, probably real photographer's copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:احمد شفيق.jpg

No evidence this is a free image. Uploader copied it from arz.wiki where it is untagged and has no evidence it is a free image. Uploader has also falsely claimed another editor transferred it to Commons, and has a history of uploading copyright-violating images of the subject. Number 57 (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bachstraße 3, 1, Bad Wilhelmshöhe, Kassel.jpg

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren von Wikipedia, mein Name ist Cordula Kremer und ich bin die Besitzerin des Hauses (Bachstraße 3 in Kassel) auf dem Wikipediabild. Ich bitte inständig darum, dass das Bild meines Hauses nicht digital sichtbar ist. Ich weiß, dass es rechtlich möglich ist, in der Weise wie das Haus digtial sichtbar ist, im Internet darzustellen und bitte aus persönlichen Gründen - um Löschung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Cordula Kremer 2.200.133.178 20:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oshiorenoya Eghierua Agabi.jpg

File:Interdom graduates, 1971.png

apparent copyvio: a photo collage of graduares a class of 1971 Altenmann (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akbar Shandermani, Siavash Kasrai, Jaleh Esfahani.png

apparent copyvio a 1986 photo pinched from www.jalehesfahani.com Altenmann (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mission in Chechnya. Alexios Schandermani.png

no evidence of copyright ownership or good license Altenmann (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vanished user ee748d473e9122ac1a7e4de97de86108 (talk · contribs)

I think the user has no idea about free images or Commons policies, from the description he wrote on the images in Arabic he is using them to express something, he doesn't know any details about the images, I also searched for this image using Google Lens and found that it is spread on other sites and most likely he re-uploaded these images.

Ibrahim.ID ✪ 20:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sami myo.jpg

Small photo without camera data, found in Facebook multiple times before upload into Commons, the uploader's only contribution. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paddy crops.jpg

After moving this file from enwiki, I noticed the image title in the metadata (which didn't appear on enwiki for some reason), which seems to indicate that the author and subject are different from what the uploader said. If there's a different author on this photo, they presumably hold the copyright. TheCatalyst31 (talk) 21:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ivan Espinel.png

background photo maybe copyrighted and also out of scope Carl Ha (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hitler, colored portrait (1920's).jpg

out of scope, we have the original b/w image (File:Hitler as young man.jpg), I see no reason for which educational purpose Hitler in color should be Carl Ha (talk) 21:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruined homes in Kalbajar city, Azerbaijan.jpg

Requesting deletion of file I uploaded because an exact duplicate already exists at File:Кельбаджар Последствия войны с. Заллар 16 августа 2021.jpg — Golden ^talk 21:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hitler, recoloured (cropped).jpg

out of scope, we have the original b/w version: File:Adolf Hitler 1936 (foto carnet).jpg Carl Ha (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinti-Mausoleum Osendorf.jpg

possible copyvio © Heinz-Jürgen Oertel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of the picture Plupp (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - If we just assumed for images to be copyvios and delete them all the time, almost all photographs taken by people would be nominated for deletion. (I will change my vote if proof is shown that is it a copyvio) Wheatley2 (talk) 22:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dumitru Crudu in Berlin Juni 2023.jpg

possible copyvio © Josef Sallanz - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biserica Sfântul Anton de Padova 2.jpg

possible copyvio © Heinz-Juergen Oertel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iulian Ciocan in Berlin.jpg

possible copyvio © Josef Sallanz - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ich habe die Erlaubnis des Eigentümers/Fotografen zum Hochladen. wurde auch beim Hochladen so angegeben. Plupp (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANA MA HDZ.jpg

unclear if original not-upscaled version is copyrighted, also unsuitable to illustrate the article of the person it may or may not depict (the article says "photo from the 1950s") Carl Ha (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI art for historical scenes

most images seems to be deleted, makes no sense anymore, also in general person page and not proper Gallery page Carl Ha (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I see no problem with historical images. It is still in scope. If anything I think this helps people see what happens if it is a lesser known historical event. LuxembourgLover (talk) 21:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - AI has no place on Commons or any other Wikimedia project. By letting AI stay on this platform, we are essentially keeping what could be misinformation. AI does not know how history truly was like humans do, why should we risk it? Wheatley2 (talk) 22:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes AI does not know. People shouldn't just prompt "give me an image of XYZ", instead they need to engineer it to precisely show what they have in mind which should match some descriptions, like those in books about the matter. It's not the AI that makes it accurate but the human and it's no less accurate than artworks about historic events made manually. Rather than outright censorship of everything historic made using modern tools (you really don't see a problem with that?), only clearly inaccurate or low-quality ones should be deleted. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should see how long it takes for an AI to make one of my uploads. It took hours to get one that is historically accurate, if someone trys to make a good one, we should keep it. As Prototyperspective said: “AI art for historical scenes makes sense for example for scenes for which there are no photos and maybe not even artworks.” Like my work (AI’s work) on the Lot Smith Cavalry and Morrisite War. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed in a bad state now because people unjustifiably deleted in use useful images and it was only a stub earlier. AI art for historical scenes makes sense for example for scenes for which there are no photos and maybe not even artworks. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:McDonnell, James S. - 5021345708.jpg

Likely copyrighted artwork. Artist signed in lower left (illegible). Ooligan (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:James McDonnell portrait.jpg

Likely copyrighted artwork. Artist signed at bottom right (illegible). Ooligan (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AI-Generated Illustration of Utah Territorial Militia Outside Fort During the Morrisite War, 1862.png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I see no problem with historical images. It is still in scope. If anything I think this helps people see what happens if it is a lesser known historical event. LuxembourgLover (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't need to reinstate my arguments here Wheatley2 (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artistic view of a British trench during the Battle of the Somme (World War I), by ChatGPT 4.0 & Dall-E 3.0 (2024).png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:History of the Arab Conquest 01.png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:History of the Arab Conquest 02.png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:History of the Arab Conquest 04.png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:History of the Arab Conquest 03.png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lot Smith Cavalry in Utah Mountains AI Representation.webp

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I see no problem with historical images. It is still in scope. If anything I think this helps people see what happens if it is a lesser known historical event. LuxembourgLover (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - LuxembourgLover has been spamming all nominations of AI art of historical events with this message, per my statements were on the other nominations for AI art for historical scenes. Wheatley2 (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: No offense, but wouldn't his (LuxembourgLovers) opinions be biased, as he is the one who created these images? Wheatley2 (talk) 22:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I only voted on three nominations, and bias is normal on Wikipedia, especially when it comes to an editors page creation or upload. LuxembourgLover (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snapedit 1724686089950.png

out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sat Tokpakbaev.jpg

Looks too official to be "own work"; image used all the time elsewhere Malik Nursultan B (talk) 22:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Painter Boi Tran 1995.jpg

Flickr washing 2603:8000:3F01:BB2B:D8AB:C373:F012:8509 22:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jawad ahmed.JPG

Copyright holder: Asad Hayat, is this the uploader? 186.175.78.77 22:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muhammad Hamza Zafar.jpg

Is Asad Hayat and the uploader the same person? 186.175.78.77 22:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La-voz-argentina-logo.png

There is a possibility that this logo may pass the COM:TOO due to the specific angle and shape of the figure representing the V, which could be represented as a hook as well. In that context, I prefer to open a deletion request and decide on its permanence. Taichi (talk) 22:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Lavoz-argentina-logo.jpg. Taichi (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://prima.iprima.cz/zpravodajstvi/26-7-2018-velke-zpravy-kauza-lidovy-dum-i-politicke-strany-nekdy-nerespektuji-rozsudek

[2] ttp://www.cssd.cz/ www.cssd.cz

[1]

[2]