Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/08

7 August 2024

9 August 2024

Deletion requests on 8 August 2024

August 8

File:Greater Coat of arms of Serbia.svg

There isnt any Great Coat of Arms of Serbia, the only real coat of arms is this [1] desingned by Ernest Karl in 1882. Snake bgd (talk) 00:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE in many articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but its fake representation of national coat of arms. Snake bgd (talk) 12:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telefe Cordoba.jpg

Se muestra al logo del Canal 11 de Buenos Aires mencionándolo como que es del Canal 8 de Córdoba, además de categorías mal redactadas. Suruxoes22 (talk) 01:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fix whatever is wrong, but if my memory isn't false, COM:TOO Argentina has been interpreted by admins on this site to be a low threshold, so the image is likely to be deleted, anyway. However, if it is kept, it's essential to remedy any lack of information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WestKY-Vert-Color.png

Logo for a college. I believe that it exceeds COM:TOO. Uploader is unlikely to actually own the logo to release it under the provided license. BigrTex (talk) 01:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag used in statement for the CFF.png

If this is really the flag of the CFF it's unlikely to be the uploader's own work Di (they-them) (talk) 01:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I create this flag using like reference other images in internet, i think it should not be a reason to be eliminated. (Tetsou TheIronman)--Tetsou TheIronman (talk) 22:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a COM:DW. 07:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Di (they-them) (talk) 07:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VOA Kuo Tien-tsai.png

The image from AFP, not VOA, see [2]. Not PD shizhao (talk) 02:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boomtown Billboard (7782038714).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete QTHCCAN (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chengdu 1991 Sexy Billboard (10564731055).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Gabdulla Tukay monument (Kazan, Tukay yard)

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia there's no FOP in Russia for sculptures and the artist of this one, Sadri Akhun, died in 1990. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2081.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1 actually, there are four authors listed for public object of cultural heritage of the peoples of the Russian Federation of federal significance - Gabdulla Tukay monument in Kazan (1958) sculptors Sadri Akhun (1903-1990), Lev Moiseevich Pisarevsky (1906—1974), Lew Kerbel (1917-2003) and architect Leonid Pavlov (1909-1990).

My photo of the souvenir pin of USSR time of this monument from my pin collection probably can be considered {{PD-RU-exempt}} in similar way as Commons:Stamps of copyrighted paintings/monuments/sculptures as presumably is that the USSR organizations of that time acquired permission from the copyright-holders of such work. EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I updated the un-deletion date. As to the pin, there's a special exception for otherwise copyrighted artwork reproduced on stamps because the Ministry of Communication specifically considers postal items to be "postage signs" and "state symbols and signs" are usually PD in Russia. There's zero evidence that it extends to pins created by random organizations under the USSR though. Exceptions to the normal law exist exactly because they are exceptions. If anything other then what there's specific exceptions for were PD there'd be no reason for them to begin with. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1965 Elkhart Double Tornado-Palm Sunday.jpg

Most likely not public domain. Argument that it is public domain rests upon the argument that it was created by a NOAA employee in his or her duties. Per [3] was actually done by Paul Huffman who was a photojournalist with The Elkhart Truth. Kuzwa (talk) 00:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nothing new there, this information is on the reference included in the upload (https://photolib.noaa.gov/Collections/National-Weather-Service/Meteorological-Monsters/Tornadoes/emodule/643/eitem/2788) but all pictures on NOAA sites are Copyright free and in public domain per Public domain declaration from NOAA :

Images in the NOAA Photo Library are in the public domain and cannot be copyrighted. There is no fee for downloading any images on the site. Educational use is encouraged as the primary goal of the NOAA Photo Library is to help all understand our oceans and atmosphere.

Pierre cb (talk) 05:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Pierre cb. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pierre cb. United States Man (talk) 06:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pierre cb. Everything on NOAA/NWS webpages are automatically in the public domain, especially things in the NOAA photo library. WeatherWriter (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Pierre cb. S5A-0043^Talk 03:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1965 Elkhart Double Tornado-Palm Sunday.jpg

I inquired with NOAA about the photo's copyright status, and a NOAA staff member replied that he was unsure if it's in the public domain. He mentioned that the photo will be removed from their website when it's migrated to a new platform. So this photo does not fall under {{PD-USGov-NOAA}}. It may or may not fall under {{PD-US-no notice}}, but we need further evidence.

The Email reply

Hi,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Regarding the copyright status, I'm unsure and will be taking steps to remove this image from the site when it is migrated to its new platform as this site is supposed to host only public domain images. For context, the old site manager was rather lax in terms what he uploaded and we have removed a large number of images of images as a result.

However, if you are still looking to use this image you should reach out to Elkhart Truth or possibly reach out to the Elkhart Public Library to see if the image is in the public domain, or if there is a different version that is available for use. Elkhart Public Library has an online exhibit listed here.

Jeff

0x0a (talk) 05:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Keep — Copyright status can be “downgraded” (like a copyrighted image becoming public domain), but it legally cannot be upgraded. This image is still in the public domain and cannot be taken out of the public domain. This is one of the most used photographs of a tornado in the world. Tineye reverse search showed nearly 300 instant uses, including big-name media like WIRED and The Weather Channel and even The Washington Post use it, crediting “NOAA”. There was already a deletion discussion on this image which checked and confirmed it was in the NOAA photo library and that it was public domain. Literally, NOAA cannot legally revoke that. I have to say Keep here as that email, legally, does nothing. WeatherWriter (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The term “public domain” refers to creative materials that are not protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright. It's publicly available on the Internet doesn't equal "public domain". You're confusing the two concepts. The person who arguing for the file to be retained must provide appropriate EVIDENCE to demonstrate that the file is in the public domain. 0x0a (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence is the deletion discussion above/first one. The image as of this moment, exists on the NOAA photo library. Per the NOAA photo library disclaimer, “Images in the NOAA Digital Library are in the “public domain” and cannot be copyrighted.” Therefore, the evidence, which was already explained prior in the previous deletion request (which kept the file by the way), clearly shows this is, as of this moment in time, in the public domain. Legally, it cannot be taken out of the public domain, as copyrights can only “downgrade”. Copyright usage cannot upgrade. There is the evidence clearly explained out. WeatherWriter (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That disclaimer only applies to works created by NOAA employees obviously, but Paul Huffman is a photographer for The Elkhart Truth. As a work for hire, only The Elkhart Truth has the right to release it into the public domain. Clearly, this image was mistakenly added to the NOAA Photo Gallery by NOAA staff. I'll suggest NOAA add a copyright notice to this image later if you still doubt the email. 0x0a (talk) 19:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That disclaimer does not only apply to works created by NOAA employees. That image is also used on this NWS webpage, which is where the PD-NWS template comes into play. This image is in the public domain. Simple as that. The PD-NWS template has also been at deletion requests before and has been upheld. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Andover, Kansas EF3 tornado.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dead Man Walking Jarrell 1997.jpg. WeatherWriter (talk) 20:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very old photograph and we do not know the contract between the Elkhart Truth and the NWS or NOAA. You cannot assume that it is in the public domain, just because it appears on the NWS website. {{PD-NWS}} is not a magic tag in denying authors' copyrights over their creations. 0x0a (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, we do know the “contract”. If you read the PD-NWS template, NWS states, “By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others.” That is directly stated in their disclaimer. The “contract” was that the image is put into the public domain. Even older images exist on Wikimedia under the license (example is File:F5 Ruskin Heights, Missouri tornado in Kansas 1957.jpg). There is plenty of proof it is in the public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 01:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are multiple, competing disclaimers scattered across past and present versions of the NWS website. Some of these definitely intended to release the image into the PD,[4] some definitely did not,[5][6][7] and at least one is ambiguous.[8] We generally do not know how long these have been in place, nor which other ones might have existed from time-to-time, nor when the copyright owner submitted their file. So unless we can prove which of the various competing mechanisms the submitter used, we don't know that they released it into the public domain. And, regardless of intention, the advice of the NWS's own legal team is that they "do not believe a disclaimer, alone, can be used to transfer a copyright holder's ownership interest to NOAA or to abandon the copyright interest to the public domain". -- Rlandmann (talk) 06:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons didn't exist when that image was created. Nor did the internet as it does now. There is literally zero chance that the person who created that image (or, as Rlandmann points out, perhaps their employer if this was a work for hire) saw that or any disclaimer. There is no evidence as to how the NWS came across this image, nor of the copyright release (or lack thereof) that the copyright holder agreed to. Berchanhimez (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per WeatherWriter mentionned. Pierre cb (talk) 12:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's evidently very significant doubt around the copyright and licencing status of third-party images contibuted to NWS websites. By now, many thousands of words have been written on the subject, but it all boils down to: we simply can't be sure beyond significant doubt that this image or others like it are in the Public Domain. --Rlandmann (talk) 15:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per an NWS email linked to in this edit by Rlandmann, this image, being apart of the NOAA digital Library, is indeed public domain. Rlandmann, I hope to see you strike your delete above, given you just confirmed via NWS that this would indeed be in the public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it appears that there is a strong possibility that this file ended up there by mistake, as discussed in a previous email from the NWS. --Rlandmann (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, mistake or not, NOAA legally cannot revoke the PD-nature of it. Like, that is legally not possible. Only the U.S. Congress has the legal authority to remove an image from the PD per Golan v. Holder. It has been under that licensing template for years and even NWS acknowledged it was placed there (and still is as verified in the previous deletion request as well as in this one). Mistake or not, the license cannot be revoked by NOAA. So, unless you got a thing from the U.S. Congress, the argument for delete has no standing. WeatherWriter (talk) 04:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no evidence that this image was ever released into the PD by its creator. The fact that at some point in time it was published on a NWS site doesn't put it in there, and that it was (probably erroneuously) transferred from there to the NOAA image library doesn't put it in there either. But I agree, if it were ever in the PD, then the NOAA can't restore its copyright. So now we just need some actual evidence that the copyright holder released it into the PD. -- Rlandmann (talk) 06:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per previous arguments. --RAN (talk) 00:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above reasonings. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 19:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This image was not taken by a NOAA employee - that is confirmed by the email from the NWS above - so PD-USGOV or any similar tag does not apply. It appears to have been removed from the NOAA Digital Library as well. If they posted it on their digital library (which NWS has confirmed only contains public domain images), then removed it, that is a strong sign that it was never public domain to begin with. Absent actual proof that the creator released it into the public domain, there is enough question as to its status that it cannot remain unless an explicit release/license is found somewhere. PD-nonotice may apply if someone can find evidence of its publication without a copyright notice (the original publication). Comments such as "once copyright is released/waived it can't be reinstated" are not accurate - because there is no evidence that the creator themselves ever released the copyright. I can't take an image someone else made, publish it and claim it's public domain, and then the copyright holder can't do anything about people reusing it under my misrepresentation of it. Same is true when "I" am a government agency. Berchanhimez (talk) 20:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
False. NOAA did not remove the image from the NOAA Digital Library. As of this timestamp, it still exists in the library. Once again, it has now been confirmed to be in the library and per the Library statements, it is in the public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I stand by my statement that absent proof that it was intended to be released into the public domain by its creator, we aren't permitted on Commons to "take their word for it" - this is regardless of whether it's some random website or the NWS. Berchanhimez (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per email. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible (likely even) that it was transferred there by mistake. In that case, it would still be copyrighted and NOAA would be potentially liable for (possibly) a copyright infringement lawsuit (more likely probably a simple DMCA notice if it’s still up) if the copyright holders ever found out. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible though that no notice rules apply. If that is the case; then I’ll update to keep. But until then, as a precaution, I (weakly) support deletion. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 21:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, I also would support keeping iff (if and only if) evidence that it meets the requirements for no notice apply - i.e. a publication without a notice before 1977 is found. Berchanhimez (talk) 23:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 04:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the NOAA Digital Collections copyright disclaimer is firmly worded, and the image remains in the digital collection, but the email adds significant doubt as to whether inclusion of the photograph in that collection in the first place was warranted. Per the precautionary principle, I would favor removing the image due to lack of certainty over its copyright status. The Indiana State Library also hosts the photograph in a digital collection, where it's made explicit that the photograph is In Copyright and that the The Elkhart Truth retains the rights to the photograph. At the very least, {{PD-USGov-NOAA}} certainly doesn't apply. —the•austin•man (works) 17:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valvata ja karistada- Vangla sünd.jpg

Unused file. Book cover. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Base de jarra con la firma Sayula, Vargas, loza de Sayula, siglo XIX.jpg

derechos de autor Ricardo Cortez Guzmán (talk) 06:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cuenco con decoración "ala de murciélago", Sayula, Jal. siglo XIX.jpg

derechos de autor Ricardo Cortez Guzmán (talk) 06:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vidmantas samuitis 223.jpg

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Sadekov.jpg

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hesse143 (talk · contribs)

These files showing German coins from 2012, which ultimately originate from the German federal ministry of finance, were taken from a web site and uploaded here with a {{Copyrighted free use}} (originally Bild-frei) license tag. The coins themselves are not considered anymore to be in the public domain (per Commons:CUR Germany), and there is also no evidence at all that these photos/illustrations showing the coins were ever offered at the source as copyrighted free use. So the files should be deleted for copyright reasons and per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Birkenfeld (Nahe)

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Rudolf Wild-Idar, who died in 1960. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2031.

Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bitterfeld - 50Pf. 1921 (9).jpg

This 1921 German Notgeld (emergency money) bill is a work of de:Hermann Schiebel, who died in 1973. So it is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2044. Rosenzweig τ 08:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding

File:Graefenhainichen - 25Pf. ND.png

to this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ملصق فيلم تمر حنة 1956.jpg

This is a film poster published in 1956. According to its {{PD-EG}} tag, the only way for it to be public domain in the U.S. is for it to have been made before 1946. hinnk (talk) 08:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo Ségolène Valente 1.jpg

Copyright violation of https://www.la-charte.fr/repertoire/chatillon-segolene/ O Kolymbitès (talk) 08:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph is also present on the subject’s website (at the bottom of http://www.segolenevalente.fr/ma-bio) and credited to Florian Joseph-Agathe. What we might need to know is if the uploader, Broly sa (talk · contribs), is actually Florian Joseph-Agathe. If not, it is indeed a copyvio. ~ nicolas (talk) 11:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Philharmonie (Luxembourg)

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Luxembourg.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly this: File:500px photo (110994325).jpeg would never be under copyright protection, I also doubt this one too: 500px photo (110994327).jpeg

The amount of energy that you use to delete could be focused to gain authorization from the authors... priorities.

-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 14:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigo.Argenton the first photo you cited may be fine, but the second one clearly isn't. I can see that it shows a portion of the architecture of the modern building. One can exploit it in their commercial websites, harming architect's economic rights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all but

Weak keep File:500px photo (110994325).jpeg, per my comment here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all but 1 per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Philharmonie (Luxembourg)

The building was completed in 2005 by Christian de Portzamparc (1944–). There is no freedom of panorama in Luxembourg, permission from the copyright holder is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pontianak Montage.jpg

One of the images in the montage was deleted A1Cafel (talk) 08:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AdamBruce-620x413.jpg

No exif, found here before upload https://www.creativelive.com/blog/founder-of-sub-pop-records-is-recreating-how-we-create-with-8stem/ - think we need vrt Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Philiphw: are you the same person as Russ Andes? If not, this appears to be at least the fourth SubPop-related photo that you have claimed as your "own work" that in fact was not. Can you explain? - Jmabel ! talk 19:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Susan Abasa 2007.jpg

Unknown/ambiguous copyright. The source the image comes from is appropriately licensed but nothing in the source suggests this is their original image or that the image is licensed appropriately. The source contains dozens of photos and none have any attribution or mention of where they come from. The physical source simply states that photographs are 'copyright' and asks for permission to reprint. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is no ambiguity here at all. The photograph in question, as with almost all of the images in the source, is a Massey University staff member working at Massey University. The physical source was published by Massey University Communications and Marketing in 2007 with the copyright notice:

Copyright: Articles and photos are copyright. We welcome reprinting if permission is sought. Contact Communications and Marketing.

Subsequently, Massey University has released the publication on its Tāmiro website with the cc-by-3.0-nz licence. Paora (talk) 21:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If Massey University decides to publish its newsletter with a free license, there simply isn’t an issue. The photo itself is most likely by one of their staff; all universities have a marketing arm that creates publicity like this one. Schwede 66 23:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Флаг тептярей с полумесяцем.jpg

fictional flag of the Teptyars, which are no longer in the modern world, since the Teptyar is only a class in the Russian Empire, mainly consisting of Tatars. The flag is not supported by anything and is recognized by no one. Now teptyari are not recorded anywhere and you are unlikely to find those who call themselves teptyari. You need to delete it. Mizgel (talk) 09:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Astrakhan Tatars.svg

A fictitious flag that they are trying to pass off as the flag of the Astrakhan Tatars. They do not have a flag, since they are not an independent ethnic group. Mizgel (talk) 09:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be COM:INUSE, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Siberian Tatars with tamga.svg

A fictitious flag of people who do not distinguish themselves as a separate people. The file needs to be deleted Mizgel (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "National flag of Sybyrstan" (Sibir-stan / Siberia-stan). There's no such country. The suffix "-stan" isn't even used in the Siberian Turkic language[9]. Nakonana (talk) 20:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:التحور J1ZS8520 التمثيل الشرعي لجين القادر الجيلاني.jpg

المحتوى حذفه Besher s (talk) 09:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Sybyr people with tamga.svg

A fictitious flag of people who do not distinguish themselves as a separate people. The file needs to be deleted Mizgel (talk) 09:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. If the flag is fictitious, try deleting it from the articles it's used in. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Sybyr people.png

A fictitious flag of people who do not distinguish themselves as a separate people. The file needs to be deleted Mizgel (talk) 09:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Siberian Khanate.svg

A made-up flag. There are no sources that he existed in the past Каракорум (talk) 07:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Potentially damaging, lacks any sort of credibility. Horizons 1 (talk) 19:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the image is used on many pages on the projects. Discussion of the correctness of the image should take place on the projects. If the image is not in use after discussions on the project, the image can also be deleted from commons. Please renew the DR in that case. --Elly (talk) 22:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Siberian Khanate.svg

A fictional state flag from the 15th century. The file needs to be deleted Mizgel (talk) 10:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Nothing has changed since the last deletion request in 2021. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Finland tatars.svg

A fictitious flag of people who do not distinguish themselves as a separate people. The file needs to be deleted Mizgel (talk) 10:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EDobersek (talk · contribs)

Files only used for advertising in dewiki

Codc (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SORPTION TAILINGS ROASTING.jpg looks interesting and could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vüsal Şərifov.jpg

The person depicted in the image is also the uploader. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless we can get permission from the original photographer to host it. Adamant1 (talk) 11:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Homo's Photo.jpg

Derived from a non-free work 真夏の夜の淫夢. 沈澄心 ✉ 06:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

???剑客小鹿 (talk) 09:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no comprehensible reason. --Krd 07:46, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homo's Photo.jpg

Delete Not educationally useful, is only used by the uploader's user page, and does not qualify as COM:INUSE; Low-quality derivative creations of 野獣先輩 from a Japanese porn. ZhaoFJx (talk) 12:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep User appears to have non-trivial edits on zhwiki, thus a few images for his user page are ok. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree The average number of edits is less than one per day, and they are mostly small edits, so it may not qualify. ZhaoFJx (talk) 10:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammadhadisaravi.jpg

Also:

CC license does not apply here as the image is not watermarked. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veddriq Leonardo Gold Medal Award.jpg and File:Veddriq Leonardo Paris 2024 Olympics (cropped).jpg

Image contains protected contect (mascot, Paris Olympics logo) and can therefore not be in the public domain. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is DM here. Mascot can be cropped.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 09:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yunya as Hastune Miku standing, front view 20231209a.jpg

Per ticket:2024080610010883 and COM:BLP. We have received the removal request from the subject. The subject is unlikely public figure. SCP-2000 13:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Militärflugzeuge in Grünsfeld im Schnee im Dezember 2022 4.jpg

Es handelt sich um ein Firmengelände! Eswurde keinerlei Freigabe zur Veröffentlichung gestattet. Hiermit sind sie aufgefordert alle Einträge zu dieser Adresse zu löschen 87.191.184.97 13:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Netter Versuch. Wer bist du überhaupt? Seit wann geben unbekannte Personen Befehle aus? Und mit welchem Recht?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Kein Löschgrund, auch wenn Sie auf Google streetview die Unkenntlichmachung erwirkt haben. Lesen Sie bitte mal de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache und lassen Sie sich die Rechtslage von einem Anwalt erläutern. --Achim55 (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hat jetzt nichts mit dem Löschantrag zu tun, aber irgendwie sind auf dem Foto keine Militärflugzeuge zu erkennen, auch nicht auf den anderen Fotos der Serie.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 15:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sollte wohl ...fahrzeuge heißen. --Achim55 (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

korrekt.

Keep und die ganze Serie umbenennen auf Militärfahrzeuge in Grünsfeld im Schnee im Dezember 2022 XXX.jpg. Kein Löschgrund ersichtlich.

Auf Google earth kann man das auch alles sehen: https://www.google.de/maps/place/97947+Gr%C3%BCnsfeld/@49.6041665,9.7453122,83m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x47a29e1a78ff66c9:0x41ffd3c8d097530!8m2!3d49.607223!4d9.7466028!16zL20vMGZkM3Fj?entry=ttu

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 20:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PSB-1945-1965.logo.png

This political symbol does not exist, in addition to the poor image quality. Editorvermelho14 (talk) 14:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Editorvermelho14!

The political symbol does EXIST in fact in campaign posters from when they were a party back then, as for the poor quality image, it was the best i could find at the time, here is the source for the symbol if you are in doubt about it´s existance:

https://images-americanas.b2w.io/produtos/26712537/imagens/socialismo-e-liberdade-uma-historia-do-psb-1945-1965/26712534_1_large.jpg Edward from 1980's (talk) 20:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rmsdu94 (talk · contribs)

Might be above COM:TOO Benin which doesn't exist.

Jonteemil (talk) 14:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ImagedeDadrix.jpg

I would like this Wikipedia page to be deleted because it contains a picture of me when I was 13 years old. Therefore, I would like this page to no longer be accessible to the public. I hope you understand my request and that you can delete this page. Best regards. Julien001DX (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vojo Milo (talk · contribs)

Given that even File:Flag of the Australian Aborigines.svg is copyrighted in Australia I guess these might be too, even if they're clearly derivative works of the the lesser coat of arms or Serbia which is free. See COM:TOO Australia, it is very very low and this logo isn't 100% identical to the coat of arms so it might be deemed copyrightable.

Jonteemil (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seminario Pontificio Mayor de Santiago de los Santos Ángeles Custodios.png

This file was initially tagged by 81.41.177.91 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-trivial logo. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Yann (talk) 16:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless the logo is old enough to be in the public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aeroporto São João do Piauí.jpg

No evidence of own work. Appears to be taken from https://appm.org.br/noticia/inauguracao-do-aeroporto-de-sao-joao-do-piaui WikiEditor50 (talk) 17:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bentley Flying Spur in Foch parking, Paris. (2).jpg

You can see me with the reflection of the car and I don't want to be visible in the photos I post on Wikimedia Mathious Ier (talk) 18:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qumran Caves WV.JPG

This a crop version of photograph in he.wiki - קובץ:Meara4.jpg. In the original photo there is a watermark - O G (Omer Golan). The description in he.wiki mention Omer Golan as the photographer. Tho photo in he.wiki need permission as this crop version. -- Geagea (talk) 18:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be deleted. The file is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.5 which allows derivatives. Simply put, the license information should be updated in the file description. XVRWiki (talk) 08:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonoma Valley Woman's Club Plaque.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: a photo pf the plaque, the whole plaque, and nothing but the plaque is surely a photo of a copyright item

This upload has been challenged by the stated photographer, by removing the SD notice. That was not the correct way to challenge it, so I have opened a full DR 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is, anyone can remove the Speedy tag, that is why we have a single click button to do it.

This is an photograph that I took of a plaque for the Sonoma Valley Woman's Club, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places in the United States of America. Its reference number is 14001115. See also: Category:Native Sons of the Golden West for how other plaques are listed.

Greg Henderson (talk) 19:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am not seeing anything copyrightable, just a few dates with no creative elements, two people would create the same few sentences. It is similar to a funeral notice that we have rules as non-copyrightable for that reason. --RAN (talk) 03:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amiras Memorial R02.jpg

Sculpture by living artist en:Yiannis Parmakelis. Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Greece. Consigned (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sculpture is not the main subject. It is seen in the distance and is only a very small part of the whole image. So there is no imperative reason for delation. MJJR (talk) 07:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are the objects in the centre/right not sculpture too? Consigned (talk) 10:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kavala 3.jpg

Sculpture by living artist en:Yiannis Parmakelis. Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Greece. Consigned (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Quadriga Award 2008

copyvio; shows contemp. art, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Major Downing Street portrait.jpg

No source given for this photo on the wall, the photographer and potential copyright. Delete per the precautionary principal. Ooligan (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Floydrosebridge (talk · contribs)

5 photos out of which 3 have EXIF metadata, all with different camera models (Canon, Sony, Nikon). One of them has a copyright notice in the EXIF: "© Alberto Novelli not for advertising use"

Stefan4 (talk) 22:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Bruno Lescoeur's photo candidate for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floydrosebridge (talk • contribs) 2012-03-16T14:00:34‎ (UTC)

Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Floydrosebridge (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work. The first two photos look like professional corporate photos from the company Edison; the third credits CAMERACHIARA in EXIF and can be found on the internet at [11] and [12] (though much lower quality/resolution) prior to being uploaded here. Similar to the previous DR under this user which happened before these files were uploaded, there is a variety of resolutions and cameras/EXIF. If the uploader is the photographer, please provide permission to COM:VRT. -Consigned (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CLFE213.jpg

2010 photo. Not own work. 200.39.139.18 21:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/08

August 8

Files in Category:Gabdulla Tukay monument (Kazan, Tukay yard)

Files uploaded by Hesse143 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Birkenfeld (Nahe)

Files in Category:Philharmonie (Luxembourg)

Files in Category:Philharmonie (Luxembourg)

Files uploaded by EDobersek (talk · contribs)

File:Veddriq Leonardo Gold Medal Award.jpg and File:Veddriq Leonardo Paris 2024 Olympics (cropped).jpg

Files uploaded by Rmsdu94 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Vojo Milo (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Quadriga Award 2008

Files uploaded by Floydrosebridge (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Floydrosebridge (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search