Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 9

[edit]

Files uploaded by Najib, Faizi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only activity of this user, since 2018: self-promotion

Schniggendiller (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Nv8200p (talk) 00:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Useless and unusable random photo of street. Part of uncurated mass upload. Redundant to File:2024 09 07 IMG 9999 133.JPG. Also added:

--P 1 9 9   01:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Rajbonshi Damily and the uploaded is trying to manipulate the Data of aboriginal Koch NerdKocha (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:FOP China, photographs of two-dimensional works (such as the various graphic works depicted in this image) are not granted FOP protections unless their presences in images are not being main subjects. However, as this image is squarely focused on these protected works, and the presence of the protected works in the image is such that they are the main subject, I think that we cannot presume that FOP would permit this image to be re-used in China. For that reason, and in light of COM:PRP, this should be deleted as presumptively non-free for lack of FOP protections. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of unknown content, not enough context, out of COM:SCOPE The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE as plain text (the ar.wiki page is just a list of recent uploads, this is not COM:INUSE) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1970s. There is no freedom of panorama in Niger, permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New uploads of the copyrighted mosque. Niger does not grant commercial Freedom of Panorama, and these commercially-licensed images infringe the building designers' copyrights.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, dubious license claim, only upload by user. Scope? Any reason would actually be free licensed? Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious date, license, and authorship claims. Without actual information true license status cannot be determined. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE as plain text (the ar.wiki page is just a list of recent uploads, this is not COM:INUSE) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This building is unlikely to have been built over 70 years ago or authored by a known architect who died more than 70 years ago. As Niger does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama, this is not OK to be commercially-licensed and hosted on Wikimedia Commons.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Assorted sculptures serving as décors in the city's roundabouts or squares. These are unlikely to have been made more than 70 years ago or authored by sculptors who died more than 70 years ago. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Niger, all of these commercially-licensed images infringe on the sculptors' copyrights.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Niger, and this means this commercially-licensed image infringes the copyright of the street artists who made the mural. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plaque déterminante.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


These are personal drawings that were uploaded by a globally locked user for the purposes of promoting the artist and their family. So the images should be deleted as OOS SPAM.

Adamant1 (talk) 02:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


These are personal drawings of coats of arms that were uploaded by a globally locked user for the purposes of promoting the artist and their family. So the images should be deleted as OOS SPAM.

Adamant1 (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Vendedor de afiches con la imagen del Presidente Chavez." => Poster seller with the image of President Chavez., main subject here is the Poster seller, not the poster --Wilfredor (talk) 04:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This map appears to come from the The Institut national de l’information géographique et forestière in France and from what I can tell there isn't a PD clause in France for works created by the government there. Except in a few situations that apply here. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Official photos of Malaysian royalty and politicians

[edit]

These photos of Malaysian royalty and prime ministers are official government-issued portraits. They are tagged with {{PD-Malaysia}}, but that template states that "Works by the government, governmental organisations and international organisations are subject to copyright for 50 years after publication" (copyright act here). A previous DR of a Malaysian PM Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Hussein Onn potrait (cropped).jpg closed as delete, so it seems that would apply here too.

CMD (talk) 04:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Ateneo de Naga University (Madrigal Building)

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The CCMF or Madrigal Building was constructed as part of a 10-year plan that commenced in 2005 according to the CCMF official website. --Raymondsiyluy05 (talk) 05:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James J. O'Brien, S. J. Library

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The building was completed in 1996 according to this website, making the building still under copyright protection.

Raul J. Bonoan, S. J. Hall

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The building existed later than 2011 according to the college handbook of Ateneo de Naga University, making the building still under copyright protection.

John J. Phelan, S. J. Science Hall

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The building was constructed in 1993 according to the staff manual of Ateneo de Naga University, making the building still under copyright protection.

Xavier Hall

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The building existed later than 2001 according to this website and CORPLAN 2010, published by the Ateneo de Naga University in 2001, making the building still under copyright protection.

Arrupe Convention Hall

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The building existed later than 2001 according to this website and CORPLAN 2010, published by the Ateneo de Naga University in 2001, making the building still under copyright protection.

Raymondsiyluy05 (talk) 04:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 05:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dhakafox1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Taken from a website where no license is specified. --DimiTalen 06:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Taken from a website where no license is specified. --DimiTalen 06:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio unless the uploader is Mike Scott (photographer at New Zealand Herald) TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geen permissie om te controleren. Toestemming van de oorspronkelijke auteur moet gestuurd worden naar VRT. トトト (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Screenshot of a copyrighted film scene being played on a media device. Cannot be the work of an external party other than that of film-crew's camera. 106.51.110.101 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Screenshot of copyrighted Youtube video: video link with timestamp.    --106.51.110.101 06:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a gallery page: with only one image. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary and personal photos SabujHossainBD001 (talk) 07:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant gallery page. This gallery page has the same two photos that are also the only files in the category. So this gallery page does not add anything of value to the category page and merely serves as a duplicate of the category. JopkeB (talk) 07:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Alabasterstein as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence, that uploade is the photograpgher (Michael Agel), no permission visible
Converted to regular DR, to allow for discussion resp. the uploader to provide a formal confirmation, as circumstances suggest that he is the photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here the uploader claims that the picture was even taken by another photographer. [1] Dubious thing Alabasterstein (talk) 07:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für das Link. War mir nicht bekannt. Hatte ihn auf seiner hiesigen Disku angeschrieben. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 07:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated drawing with no claimed significance. Omphalographer (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not public domain in the US, and not even based on a “folkloric composition” so the core tune isn’t public domain either. Dronebogus (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: obviously AI-generated logo unused outside a user sandbox. Omphalographer (talk) 07:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bad and distorted duplicate of File:2024 FIFA U-20 Women's World Cup.png Flix11 (talk) 07:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Habibhelou (talk) 07:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RemoneXD2555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: various unused diagrams about "knowledge management", all clearly AI-generated and unusable.

Omphalographer (talk) 07:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bad and distorted duplicate of File:2024 FIFA U-20 Women's World Cup.png Flix11 (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Screenshot of a copyrighted film scene being played on a media device. Cannot be the work of the uploader.    --106.51.110.101 07:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]