Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

August 17

[edit]

This is a photo of a different wrestler. This is not Anthony LoMonaco it is Michael Deek ButterflyMeowMeow (talk) 02:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the subject is incorrectly identified, the idea is that we rename the file instead of deleting it. However, you wrote that it is Michael Deek and w:Michael Deek redirects to w:Snot Dudley, who is identified as the subject in the file name and the description, so I'm not sure what you mean. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This is my image and I dont want to share this image publicly anymore Nonaligned22 (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep In scope and outside of courtesy window. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Itz Guddu Chauhan (talk) 05:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The church dates to 1979 (year when it was built).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Modern artworks and sculptures (crucifixes, statues etc.), see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Saint Mark Parish Church (Cabarroguis, Quirino). All are obviously post-1972, considering the building began to be built in 1979.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in DR Congo A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The photo itself was not taken in DR Congo. It was taken at a public art exhibition in Germany, at Documenta 12. Further, it is not a faithful reproduction of a single work. It is an installation view, meaning the photographer had to choose how to frame the composition as an independent work. Finally, the images themselves appear at no more than thumbnail size. 2600:1700:9D0:95B0:C59E:9611:BA02:DA18 10:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ogiediaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are unlikely to be the uploader's own works. PNG quality suggests these are mere screencaptures. Also, the user account name is identical to that of the noted Filipino actor/entertainment reporter/talent manager, but I doubt Diaz himself would had created an account only to upload possibly-copyvio files.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a signature. There is some Privacy Issues. AnuraDissanayake (talk) 07:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus PD rationale (70pma for an unknown author), country of origin must be named to clarify copyright status. Quick1984 (talk) 07:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative, COM:PACKAGING. Quick1984 (talk) 07:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyright violation : author in metadata is "Marianne Grimont", uploader is "Olivier Massart" (the man in the photography, in fact, so obv. not the photographer). Needs proof of a free licence, since "own work" is not valid. / Possible violation de copyright : l'auteur de la photo n'est pas celui qui a téléchargé le fichier (lequel n'a donc pas le droit d'en choisir la licence). Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio— no FOP in benin

Dronebogus (talk) 04:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Benin does not permit Freedom of Panorama for commercial uses of images of copyrighted memorials and monuments of the country, including this. This sculptural monument was inaugurated in 1995, and was a joint authorship of: architect Yves Ahouen-Gnimon and the following sculptors: w:fr:Fortuné Bandeira (for the columns and bas-reliefs), Yves Kpede (for the Egungun), and Dominque Kouas Gnonnou (for the bronzes).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm glad I saw this long deletion request and was able to upload the file we've had on voy:Benin locally. It's once again a problem that the bot that's supposed to warn us about nominations for deletion of files COM:INUSE on our sister site is not working. Commercial FOP is not a requirement on various Wikimedia sites including en.voy, but if we're not warned about deletions, files get removed from our site for no good reason, just because we're depending on Commons for hosting and blithely going about our business. And please don't give me an annoyed response that lack of commercial FOP isn't no good reason - I know it's de rigueur on Commons. You see that's not the point I'm making. I hope the bot resumes working soon and did hear it probably will. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colorisation and possible AI-enhancement of a pre-existing image of unclear provenance (eg. https://www.facebook.com/VILLATEINFORMA/posts/undiacomohoy17-de-abril-1849-el-general-antonio-duverg%C3%A9-y-su-ej%C3%A9rcito-derrotan-e/139071580994326/ from 2020). Belbury (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-existing portrait (eg. https://misiones.cubaminrex.cu/es/articulo/anuncian-actividades-en-dominicana-por-natalicio-de-maximo-gomez), no artist or year specified. Belbury (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoldenGully (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Doubt on the own claim mention, Picture clearly not in public domain

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Every single one of the food photos I checked was a copyvio, e.g.
Omphalographer (talk) 22:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoldenGully (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Due to the history of the user, she/he cannot be trusted with the uploads not being copyvio, as all the photos are in different formats

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by GoldenGully (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User was uploading food images sourced to Instagram and YouTube, and when those files were flagged for lacking permission the user continued to upload images in a similar style as their "own work" instead. But File:Queso arish dominicano.jpg is very clearly a rotated crop of https://www.instagram.com/p/CctVCXkLQzG.

Belbury (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality images of very generic landscapes/nature/roads, exact location very often unknown. Not realistically useful for educational purposes, thus out of scope.

~TheImaCow (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Near Suffolk, En route to... etc are enough location for me. I say keep most. 186.173.152.220 19:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Main reason for deletion is the low quality and the generic nature of the images. Hundreds of thousands of random landscapes, views from roads, animals etc are on Commons, all much better quality and thus better to use. ~TheImaCow (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Low quality images that appear to be personal images of a road trip that were mass imported from Flickr with no context to give them educational use. Nv8200p (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Testicules 200.39.139.28 15:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Penis 200.39.139.28 15:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep shows what it describes Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Penis 200.39.139.28 15:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:Nudity 200.39.139.28 15:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Penis 200.39.139.28 15:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep good quality anatomical image, not exhibitionistic in nature Dronebogus (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PENIS 200.39.139.28 15:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep illustrates subject Dronebogus (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original work is doubtful QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 00:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a book cover. How old is this book? Yann (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per ar:رياض_الصالحين, the book is from ~1200 AD, and its text is unambiguously free of copyright (and is on Wikisource as ar:s:رياض_الصالحين). But that still leaves the copyright status of this decorative cover in question. Omphalographer (talk) 18:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for your contribution. The book itself has no copyright neither the cover (no copyright mention). Indeed you can contact the publishing house throw this link and they will confirm my permission to take a photo of the cover throw their official Facebook page (messages). In the Arabic world Islamic book covers has no copyrights except for one publishing house wish is "دار الكتب العلمية". I'm not good in English but feel free to contact any Arabic admin in commons and he will share the idea and explain it better than me. أبو آسر (talk) 21:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
About the photo .. I own the book and I have a good Library that I can use for such useful and helpful photos. If it's deleted I'll have to upload it in the Arabic Wikipedia and the other wikis will not be able to have it in their articles. I'm an admin in wiki source and I have most of permissions in Arabic wiki (Editor/Uploader/Reviewer). أبو آسر (talk) 21:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a selfie, so a permission from the author is needed. Yann (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request: the file is unused, and it's really just my speculation. I request https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Second_Cold_War_alliances.svg be deleted for the same reason. Discombobulates (talk) 07:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm withdrawing this. Discombobulates (talk) 11:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created this file and believe it should be deleted because I'm not updating it, and the premise of depicting what I want to depict in just this one file is not very realistic Discombobulates (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to withdraw your request again? 186.175.167.213 03:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. I did last time because it wasn't actually deleted after I requested it and I didn't want someone to stumble up the request months later and delete it (because I might have actually wanted to update it again then). Discombobulates (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request: the file is unused, and it's really just my speculation. I request https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Second_Cold_War_alliances_(political).svg be deleted for the same reason. Discombobulates (talk) 07:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm withdrawing this. Discombobulates (talk) 11:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created this file and believe it should be deleted because I'm not updating it, and the premise of depicting what I want to depict in just this one file is not very realistic Discombobulates (talk) 18:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, being used. 186.175.167.213 03:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it isn't. If you check the usage section, you'll see it's not. It was on Wikidata I think before but someone seems to have removed it. Discombobulates (talk) 17:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was uploaded from Flickr, but it's not clear that the Flickr user had permission to use or license the photo as part of their compilation. See https://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/bware/ - the Flickr user may have simply copied the image from the person's academic profile page. There is also a cropped photo at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr._Dutch_Bilal_Ware_wisdom_(cropped).jpg that has the same issue. Dreamyshade (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Dr Dutch, but Dr Butch. (Rename if kept.) 186.174.179.47 12:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This file was originally uploaded to Flickr under the cc-by-2.0 license, but has been verified as a license format acceptable for upload to Wikimedia Commons. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Chariotrider555 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Modern style painting but no date or painter is given, with source being a dead link to a tourist website. Uploaded 10 years ago, in use. Proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by GeorgR (de) as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=From page 6 of http://vcd-bayern.de/texte/20170318_Reaktivierungstreffen/Stadt-Umlandbahn-Regensburg.pdf Yann (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by GeorgR (de) as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=Taken from https://www.teublitz.de/communice-news/news/artikel/die-125-jaehrige-geschichte-der-lokalbahn-im-staedtedreieck-1641 Yann (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by GeorgR (de) as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=Taken from https://www.teublitz.de/communice-news/news/artikel/die-125-jaehrige-geschichte-der-lokalbahn-im-staedtedreieck-1641 Yann (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by GeorgR (de) as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=Taken from https://www.teublitz.de/fileadmin/Stadt/Dateien/Veranstaltungen/125-jaehriges_Jubilaeum_der_Bahnstrecke_im_Staedtedreieck__Quelle_-_Eisenbahnfreunde_Staedtedreieck_.jpg Yann (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art like sculptures, statues, etc. (even publicly displayed ones) installed after January 1, 1978, in the United States under its copyright laws as explained in COM:FOP US. So, while the uploader who took this photo can release their photo under a free license Commons accepts, the photo is a derivative work. This means the copyright status of the photographed work itself also needs to be considered, and Commons can't keep this file unless the photographed work itself is either within the public domain or this particular image of the work has been released by the works creator/copyright holder under an acceptable free license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In dieser Form nicht hilfreiche Zusammenstellung von Wappen unterschiedlicher Familien, die nur den Namen gemeinsam haben. Wegen der Unbrauchbarkeit out of scope. Sinnvoll wären die Wappen einzeln, aber nicht so GerritR (talk) 21:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Außerdem wohl auch kein eigenes Werk, die Zusammenstellung hat wohl jemand anderes vorgenommen. Datei vermutlich aus unbekannter Quelle entnommen.--GerritR (talk) 21:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work. This's a mural behind the Lapulapu historical marker in Lapu-lapu, Central Visayas, the Philippines. But I wasn't sure that this is under the Template:WorkDepicted-PD-PhilippinesGov. --211.47.118.167 22:05, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed. I uploaded this file but decided against using it. Either not needed for conveying information or wrong data format LWJ15 (talk) 23:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed. I uploaded this file but decided against using it. Either not needed for conveying information or wrong data format LWJ15 (talk) 23:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality LWJ15 (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy-deleted...prompt uploader request. --DMacks (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed. I uploaded this file but decided against using it. Either not needed for conveying information or wrong data format LWJ15 (talk) 23:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]