Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
18 August 2024
20 August 2024
Deletion requests on 19 August 2024

August 19

[edit]

File:GREAT OCEAN MARATHON.jpg

[edit]

Unused picture. Looks professional as in taken by somebody on a race vehicle. Unlikely that the uploader is also the author. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 02:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HusseinoK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: low-quality AI-generated images of the White House, the Statue of Liberty, an American flag, Sleeping Beauty Castle at Disneyland, and, oddly, several of Kratos from the video game God of War. The first four are all redundant to many higher-quality photographs, and the latter are clearly derivative works.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

أنا رفعت ملفات على مقالات تكاد لا تحتوي على هذه الصور أما بالنسبة للدقة فيوجد العديد من هذه الصورة مرفوعة بدقة عالية
مقالة كريتوس كانت لا تحتوي غبر على صورة واحدة فقط
إذا تكررت هذه الشكاوي سأتوقف عن المساعدة في نشر أي صورة أو ملف قد يساعد في تحسين ويكيبيديا و ويكيميديا كومنز HusseinoK (talk) 11:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: based on their usage, CSD G3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HusseinoK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvio: these images all look like they were scanned from print media; the uploader's claim of own work seems unlikely. (This is particularly obvious for images like File:نبات المنثور.jpg or File:بطم.jpg, where there's a clearly visible halftone pattern.)

Omphalographer (talk) 02:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

أنا أقوم بتصوير النباتات بشكل علمي مع ثماره و أزهاره
لا اعلم ين هي المشكلة
هل ستحذف الصور التي قمت بتصويرها و النباتات التي قمت بشرائها من أجل ويكيبيديا ستكون بلا فائدة!!
ارجوكم لا أريد لتعبي و أموالي التي أنفقتها أن تذهب بلا فائده HusseinoK (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(ترجمة جوجل) تبدو هذه الصور وكأنها صور لصفحات من الكتب. هل التقطت صورة للنبات بنفسك، أم التقطت صورة لصورة شخص آخر؟ The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
يوجد بعضها من كتاب و بعضها من تصويري ولكن الكتاب علمي وهو للإثراء فقط HusseinoK (talk) 03:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
anyway if this photos removed I will remove all my work in wikipedia and wikimedia commons
because i buy this plants for this websites and improve them
if this websites don't respcet my i will stop help them and go away
thank you anyway that was beautiful days i don't want to finish them HusseinoK (talk) 03:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't lie to us - these are clearly not your own photographs. Some of them, like File:نبات الكتان مع بذره.jpg, are not even photographs; they are paintings! They are all obviously printed on paper; we can see the dots from the printer and the wrinkles in the paper. Omphalographer (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
look i told you in another massage their some photos from book i have
please read all my massage i don't won't to missunderstand each other
Sorry BTW cause i send it in two massages
and thank you for your honesty HusseinoK (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photos from the books can't be used because they are likely copyrighted. Uploading them to Commons would constitute a copyright violation. But while you can't upload photos from books, you are welcome to upload photos (of plants) that you have photographed yourself with your own camera or mobile phone. Nakonana (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will remove them okay,but i need some days for these, please
i promsie i will remove all photos (all the photos taken from the book)
Just few days(less than five days)
if anything happens,I am responsible for my photos.
if you want a guarantee like my number or something else i am ready HusseinoK (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HusseinoK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, wrong license, no source.

Yann (talk) 10:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Like previous uploads, these all look like scans from print media. Some of them might be old enough to be in the public domain, but we'd need to know the actual sources to determine that. Omphalographer (talk) 10:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
هذه الصور بعضها من مدينتي حماة و القديم منها موجود في ملفات عائلتي لأنها منزلهم القديم و حارتهم
بالمناسبة يمكنك البحث عن الحارة عند العرب و ماذا تعني لهم
ة أما عن الشخصيات فهي صورة كانت مع جدي وكانت اهداء من صديقه في ايام صغرهم يمكنني ان اصور لك الورقة كاملة مع كتاباتهم علبها لتتأكد من ذلك
و اصور الباقية فهي من تصويري و من ملفات ابي القديمة و الصور السابقة التي قمتم بازالتها هي من ملفات ابي ايضا
بالمناسبة شكرا جزيلا على عدم حسن تعاملكم معي HusseinoK (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by HusseinoK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with bad history, small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

شكرا جزيلا على تقييمك السلبي لي بدون سبب
هذه الملفات رغم صغرها وقلة دقتها لكنها تعد من الارث و من الصعب الحصول عليها
الكثير من المستخدمين العرب سيعرفون قيمتها
اعتذر عنك على سلوكك السيء معي وعلى تصرفك المسيء لي HusseinoK (talk) 16:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Henry I of England

[edit]

This gallery page has only one image, that is not enough "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media". (See Commons:Galleries.) JopkeB (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Qiantang River Bridge

[edit]

this page is useless,cuz there's already a category David290 (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: galleries can happily co-exist with categories. --JuTa 04:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qiantang River Bridge

[edit]

This gallery page has only one image, that is not enough "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media". (See Commons:Galleries.) JopkeB (talk) 05:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pordic - Le Vaudic - Wn Po 10 (Bunker type R 669 - intérieur) 04.jpg

[edit]

En doublon avec : File:Pordic - Le Vaudic - Wn Po 10 (Bunker n°1 type 669 - intérieur) 04.jpg Kev22 (talk) 06:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pordic - Le Vaudic - Wn Po 10 (Bunker type R 669) 03.jpg

[edit]

En doublon avec : Pordic - Le Vaudic - Wn Po 10 (Bunker n°1 type 669) 04.jpg Kev22 (talk) 06:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ILS 6758 German Khan and others at Babi Yar 2016.jpg

[edit]

Copyright holder: SERGE ILLIN. No evidence that the Flickr account is the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

File:U484 runes.png

[edit]

obvious mistake: missing runes, misleading inscription as compared to Samnordisk runtextdatabas and other existing images Macuser (talk) 11:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radon.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: CSD G4 (recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus): Commons:Deletion requests/Fake pictures of chemical elements
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We should at least notify the projects where this image is currently used. If they decide to further use it, despite its problem, we should accept this, IMO. In addition, we might consider to adapt the filename.--Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Other language wikipedias use this image, and red links would obviously appear if it was deleted. Hydrogen astatide (talk) 12:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redlinks are removed by a bot so that's no reason to keep the file. Jonteemil (talk) 22:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
K Hydrogen astatide (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Misleading: Reupload of File:Radon imitation.jpg where the uploader said "This is no radon, but radon glows red in a discharge tube, which could look like that. This image is glowing xenon with changed colors." --Achim55 (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wait what i thought they mixed a bunch of gases to make that cool red color Hydrogen astatide (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a sample of photoshopium. But neon glows a similar color, mixes of gases that actually can be handled glow various colors, and phosphor coatings on the tubes can make even more colors. See en:neon sign. DMacks (talk) 21:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What the hell is photoshopium Hydrogen astatide (talk) 12:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
jk i know photoshopium is fake Hydrogen astatide (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Photoshopium" is an element derived from the mineral Adobe. :) DMacks (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also I didn't know that phosphor can make even more colors Hydrogen astatide (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has been 11 days Hydrogen astatide (talk) 01:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion-queue gets quite backlogged from time to time. Several of the admin queues seem to be at the moment. DMacks (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Francium.jpg (currently used on 2 projects). --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete it shouldn't be reuploaded in the first place. Wostr (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andhra premier league logo.png

[edit]

Not own work as claimed, and looks to be more than just a text logo, so above threshold for copyrighted logo. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tonyiamba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: disparate collection of historical images, photos of existing photos, and low-res/web-sized screengrabs, missing permission; missing or inconsistent EXIF data or credit to someone else.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello P199, with response to your deletion request, I will like to state that the above mentioned pictures belong to me. I have them in hard and soft copies and used my phone image editor to enhance and reduce their resolution to fit stipulated size. Tonyiamba (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Belonging to you" is not the same as owning the rights; they remain with the original photographer. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I own the rights because I paid for the pictures. Tonyiamba (talk) 06:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Nigeria, a photographer is hired to cover private events. He delivers images taken after being fully paid with all rights purchased. That is how it works in Nigeria. Tonyiamba (talk) 06:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If a photographer is commissioned to take my portrait and paid upon delivery of hard and soft copies. Does he retain sole rights to my images after he has been paid? I don't think so, my uneducated conjecture. Tonyiamba (talk) 06:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is not the case, then it means most individuals have no rights to upload their pictures on social media like Facebook, because they didn't capture the pictures by themselves. Tonyiamba (talk) 07:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is full of articles on people, places and events lacking pictorial images for elaboration. This most times makes a boring read. Images only serve to improve the quality of the narrative and add some historical perspective. If you, P199, as adminitrators are antagonistic towards uploaded images due to overbearing criteria and conditions, what purpose does it serve Wikipedia's content? Tonyiamba (talk) 08:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It also means that you, P199 have no right to use the passport on your international passport data page for any presentation or upload be it electronic or physical since the rights belong to the photographer. Correct me if I'm wrong. Tonyiamba (talk) 08:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whether or not you obtain the rights from a hired photographer depends on the terms in your contract with the photographer. In many cases, the photographer indeed retains the rights. Since you are admittedly not the photographer, you need to prove that you have permission via the process described at COM:VRT. BTW, some of these images listed here are clearly many decades old. I doubt that you commissioned them... --P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Nigeria, we do not create contracts for personal photography. We create contracts for construction of roads, schools, bridges, procuments etc. I find it a bit overboard to prove permissions that are of insignificance to the photographer and myself, based on my location. Yes, two images (taken from 2000 and below) were not commissioned by me but I had possesion of the hard copies and produced softcopies with my phone camera.
It seems you are trying to do your job and I can understand that. I will try to obtain permissions from one or two photographers for the most recent pictures, however, if the pictures I have uploaded do not meet your required criteria, kindly delete them. So we can stop all this unnecessary back and forth. Best regards. Tonyiamba (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedian SAilesh Patnaik at Odia Wikipedia 16 - Day 1.jpg

[edit]

Not relevant for Commons. Saileshpat (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sailesh Patnaik at Odia Wikipedia 16 - Day 1.jpg

[edit]

Not relevant for Commons. Saileshpat (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sailesh Patnaik at Odia Wikipedia 16 - Day 1 (212).jpg

[edit]

Not relevant for Commons. Saileshpat (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sailesh Patnaik during preparation for a Wikipedia tutorial shoot on 6 July 2018 before Odia Wikipedia's 16th anniversary.jpg

[edit]

Not relevant for Commons. Saileshpat (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNF Logo.png

[edit]

The uploader released this file into the public domain but I'm skeptical that they are indeed the copyright holder. I've nominated few files for deletion so please keep that in mind. If I've messed up, just tell me politely. Clovermoss (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The symbol to the left is a pictorial representation of a waterfall and I think is original enough for copyright protection. Clovermoss (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anna Mónika Pia szász hercegnő és Habsburg–Lotaringiai József Ferenc főherceg.jpg

[edit]

circa 1920s Hungarian photograph by Rozgonyi Dezső. I can't seem to find a death date for this photographer who was born in 1879. Likely PD in the US (subjects married in 1924), but too young for assuming the photographer has been dead long enough. Abzeronow (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The work of Dezső Rozgonyi (1879- ). Source National Museum of Hungary, https://gyujtemenyek.mnm.hu/record/-/record/MNMMUSEUM2110343 Retrieved: 2024.08.19. I could not find any information for the time of the death of the author. - Elekes Andor (talk) 19:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flatlay with a small notebook (Unsplash).jpg

[edit]

Unused random photo of nondescript desk, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Perfectly good stock photo. In scope. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment might or might not be worth keeping, but why are we repeatedly wasting time discussing images that are certainly in no way harmful to keep, that came in as part of large batch uploads? What is the gain in taking time to discuss these? - Jmabel ! talk 03:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
* Delete Commons is not an image repository for stock photos Nv8200p (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it is, as long as its freely licensed. We have loads of photos from Unsplash etc Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The guiding principle is that images should have educational purpose (not whether it is a stock photo or not). So the question is, what is the educational value of this image??? --P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other files by Danigonza

[edit]

Danigonza (talk · contribs) I've already marked all the obvious copyright violations, however all the other images should be removed as well. This user takes liberties uploading other people's work and claiming it as their own. Some of the pictures look professional but don't have author/copyright info in the Exif data.

And yes, I'm sorry I'm too lazy to list all the files as there are a lot. Just look at the contributions of Danigonza to get the list. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A30s 3803 02.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Cryptic-waveform as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 - Unlike their other uploads, I don't think this is clear-cut enough to be an F10 The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Getting others through some drills on top of a hill.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Cryptic-waveform as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 - Unlike their other uploads, I don't think this is clear-cut enough to be an F10 The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/08/19&oldid=919309539"