Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/23

22 July 2024

24 July 2024

Deletion requests on 23 July 2024

July 23

File:- 2024 211 Marmashen Monastery.gif

Я автор изображения. Прошу удалить - так как повторяет очень похожее мое изображение Well-read MountainMan (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Which other image is it very similar to? Please link it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Объект 195.jpg

Copyvio: http://gurkhan.blogspot.com/2018/10/95.html Nickel nitride (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Both copies on "blogspot" have a text over the image whereas the copy at Commons does NOT. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo cropped and lettering removed in photoshop. This photo has one author - Gur Khan (Alexey Khlopotov). Nickel nitride (talk) 01:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Лучше уж эта фотка, чем то, что было ранее Kosthar4uk (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While uploader said that is Marbled swordtail (X. meyeri), this species actually does not show elongated tail fin, which makes this identification false.[1] This uploader has been editing for the sole purpose of spreading misinformation. Other uploaded image by this user shows false licence and copyright violation. (See this) See the article that this user edited[2] and what I rewritten only based on claims in papers,[3] this user continued to add false claim that is not discussed in papers at all in articles. This image is already spread too much as X. meyeri in other language of Wikipedia, best way is to delete that. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 03:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Parties.svg

Unused content fork of File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea parties.svg TDL (talk) 04:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use this file in the entry rather than the current map, as the current map incorrectly distinguishes between "non-parties" and "signatories", whereas signatories are in fact non-parties in the context of multilateral treaties that require a step beyond signature (ratification, accession, etc.) for a State to become a party. Accordingly, the colouration of the current map is misleading. 141.39.213.233 09:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there's something wrong with the map, then it's much better to update it so that it gets used globally, rather than creating an unused content fork.

I've implemented the requested colour change to the currently in use map, so this file can be deleted as a duplicate. TDL (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - Parties.svg

Unused content fork of File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea parties.svg TDL (talk) 04:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use this file in the entry rather than the current map, as the current map incorrectly distinguishes between "non-parties" and "signatories", whereas signatories are in fact non-parties in the context of multilateral treaties that require a step beyond signature (ratification, accession, etc.) for a State to become a party. Accordingly, the colouration of the current map is misleading. 141.39.213.233 09:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there's something wrong with the map, then it's much better to update it so that it gets used globally, rather than creating an unused content fork.

I've implemented the requested colour change to the currently in use map, so this file can be deleted as a duplicate. TDL (talk) 16:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andre Fauve.jpg

Historical images, created in 1963, unlikely to be uploader's work. Additional source and license information should be provided A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASF rap.jpg

Created by a globally blocked user (Moina kissimani), sockpuppet of Asf Dine : long term abuse for self-promotion Supertoff (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Epiduo sales in Singapore.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Hehua as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per Com:PACKAGE and the logo on it is not in Public domain per COM:TOO Singapore. Is this a US or Singapore work? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I don't know. And now Galderma's Headquarters is in Zug, Switzerland. I also don't know when the logo on it is used and published first in which country. Hehua (talk) 06:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SaintE logo 3stack morristown color CMYK.jpg

This file was initially tagged by OhKayeSierra as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio of logo at [4]. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Communist Party Logo (Vector).svg

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the gears and the combined hammer and sickle, the levels are below TOO.

Keep. Ahri Boy (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't the "stripes" on the back of the sickle representing the american flag make it above TOO?

Delete All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 21:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Too simple in my eyes. Ahri Boy (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:TOO US. Just look at the other allowed images! Some are more complex than this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SIAE MICROELETTRONICA S.p.A.png

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:TOO Italy and w:Siae Microelettronica, which shows the logo is notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bickham-Script.png

This file should not be handled through the speedy deletion process, but should be a regular nominate for deletion. Typeface designs are mostly not protected by copyright law. It’s just the font softwares. Flamon (talk) 05:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio). Further information on why converting set type to outlines or export them to pixels is a fair use can be found here e.g. https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/font-licensing.html#act-img . The deletion request for this file should be removed. Flamon (talk) 05:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need evidence of permission to allow this to be used by anyone for all commercial purposes. Based on the license terms, it appears that only the orignal purchaser of the adobe license (the uploader) has the ability to use the font in commercial work. We don't have that permission, and would need to obtain it from the foundry/adobe. The image itself is legal, but the terms allowing use of the font in rasterized images disallowed additional commercial reuse of the font or image without repurchasing of the license from adobe or the foundry.

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 21:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chuck,

Thank you for clarifying your doubts.

Indeed, only the Adobe CC subscriber is allowed to use Adobe CC fonts for commercial work. However, once the work is converted to pixels or outlines, it is no longer considered a font. Embedding a font in a PDF file still counts as a font, but this secure way is permitted by the license. The font file itself is not embedded in a PNG pixel file or SVG vector file.

Consider this scenario: if I take a photo of a storefront with a specific typeface, I can sell that photo or make it public domain. People using that photo don’t need to license the font used because they cannot extract and use the font to create new texts. If your interpretation were correct, 90% of Wikimedia images containing text would be illegal.

One more scenario: I can layout a PDF info sheet with a long text, possibly including the name of the font used, and make the exported PDF document public domain. People can print and sell this document or create new documents using parts of the PDF, either as in-frame or as rasterized.

And one more scenario: If I take a photo of a store front with a typeface, I can sell that photo or make it public domain. People who use that photo do not have to license the font that was used, because they can not use the font to set new texts.

If you were right, 90% of wikimedia images that contain text would be illegal.

But one relevant legal scenario could be that Adobe says “Did the user Flamon have the right to use the font when he produced the image?” I would refer to my real name and provide one invoice from before the date of upload, provided that the font was part of the Adobe CC library at that time. And if I did not comply, any user could register for Adobe CC, generate that image again, upload the same image as a new version or reupload a new one, quit the Adobe CC subscription within 14 days and would also get a complete refund.

Fonts are not typefaces.

If there are specific paragraphs in the license agreement that you believe prohibit this usage, please let me know, and we can discuss how it applies to this case. Flamon (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag map of South West Africa (1928–1990).png

There's an SVG version of this flag map, see File:Flag map of South West Africa (1928–1982).svg Adinar0012 (talk) 06:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having an SVG doesn't mean that we just delete the PNG version. Please identify how the PNG is out of scope, and what is the advantage of a deletion? — billinghurst sDrewth 23:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag map of South Africa and South West Africa (1928–1990).png

There's an SVG version of this flag map, see File:Flag map of South Africa (1928–1982, with South West Africa).svg Adinar0012 (talk) 07:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The process is to label PNG with the template {{Vector version available}} not to think deletion. What is the issue with both file type versions existing? Why would we take away user choice? — billinghurst sDrewth 23:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:19881127A0117 John BarnesA.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Wvdp as no source (No source since). Converting to regular DR as the source is provided and it appears to match EXIF. Presumably the concern is the that uploader, User:Judophotos, might not be the Judophotos mentioned in the EXIF and watermark. —RP88 (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob Santos.jpg

Clear copyright violation - cover from Sports Illustrated in 2022, which is protected under copyright Bilby (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States (37521073921) (cropped).jpg

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Donald J. Trump (32820377445).jpg, needs permission from the photographer Doug Coulter. Also, a news about WM Commons debate on this photo's copyright A1Cafel (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJT Official Portrait (cropped).jpg

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Donald J. Trump (32820377445).jpg, needs permission from the photographer Doug Coulter. Also, a news about WM Commons debate on this photo's copyright A1Cafel (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJT Official Portrait cropped.jpg

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Donald J. Trump (32820377445).jpg, needs permission from the photographer Doug Coulter. Also, a news about WM Commons debate on this photo's copyright A1Cafel (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Diaka Camara

Not own work, original is credited to Author MOHAMAD MAZBOUDI - we need VRT to keep. Only contribution of a new user

Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJT Official Portrait.jpg

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Donald J. Trump (32820377445).jpg, needs permission from the photographer Doug Coulter. Also, a news about WM Commons debate on this photo's copyright A1Cafel (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:@ Prof Catherine Colebourne FASSA Screenshot 2021-11-13 at 15.17.06.png

The YT video is free but I don't think this photo is. They displayed the photo in the video but don't have rights to the photo - you can see the full photo here https://royalsoc.org.au/blog/society-fellows-elected-as-2021-assa-fellows and https://www.remindinghistories.net/catharine-coleborne Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are yiu saying "I don't think this photo is"

or "[they] don't have rights to the photo" If its the latter then can you supply a citation. I wouyldnt want doubt to rule our decision. If its the former then its OK we don't need for you to be sure. Victuallers (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the video is free, how would a screenshot of it not be free? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They need to have rights for the photo to be freely hosted here. You can't take a Getty image, display it in your video and claim its CC. Its a DW of a copyrighted image Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a screencap of a freely licensed video? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Море77 (talk · contribs)

1992/2002 artwork, needs VRT from artist IF in scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solar lights.jpg

CGI image uploaded for a now-deleted spam page on enwiki, by an SPI spam account. May not genuinely be their own work. Belbury (talk) 11:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Hunde nicht in den Wäschetrockner".jpg

Es fehlt eine Lizenzierung durch die noch lebende Urheberin - Hochladerin ist nicht Lizenzierungsberechtigt Lutheraner (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berthelsdorf 15.09.2023, Foto Holger Hinz - PHH 4082.jpg

possible copyvio © Holger Hinz - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KMO Gröditz 12.10.2023, Foto Martin Pizga - DSC 3605.jpg

possible copyvio © Martin Pizga - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alireza jadidi pic.jpg

This image gives wrong information to the audience Moretv33 (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid deletion rationale 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this image as soon as possible, because the information is incorrect Jackcamera2 (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there's incorrect information in the file description, edit it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Кутлуг Бильге Каган.jpg

No source authorisation. Incall (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luc Frieden - President of Eurochambres.jpg

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 12:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Susan Edwards.jpg

Wright State University is not part of the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rugby Guy Pardiès 1970s.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Daxipedia as no permission (No permission since) Krd 13:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:4EVER49 V2.1 Full Colour 600x600.png

No author and no permission, copyvio from https://4ever49radio.nl/ which clearly states "copyright 4EVER49RADIO" Hoyanova (talk) 14:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the language quoted in COM:TOO Netherlands, I think this is above it, but I'm not sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by غريب1 (talk · contribs)

Not own works, no source, wrong license, and no evidence of a free license or public domain.

Yann (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of free license or PD -> Delete. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 20:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by غريب1 (talk · contribs)

Getty images. While the license is plausible, we need evidence that it is valid.

Yann (talk) 13:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at least for the latter of the two images, in which the subject died in 1953. {{PD-Saudi Arabia}} is pretty clear that that is free to use. Getty continues to market many images in the Popperfoto collection which are definitively in the public domain, and this is one of them. Abovfold (talk) 03:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both. The first one is {{PD-Italy}} and the second one is {{PD-Saudi Arabia}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fix. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by غريب1 (talk · contribs)

all of them are old photos with no metadata low resolution wrong license, most likely copyvios

Waqar💬 15:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep many. Many of these images are of Ibn Saud, which are almost certain to be in the public domain per {{PD-Saudi Arabia}}, as he died in 1953. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajoy-sobre-cobro.jpg

COM:DW: Unknown source of the potrait of Mariano Rajoy A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panoramica01.JPG

Adding this as well:

Unnecessary redirect Oscar_. (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Put a V6 Engine in The Toyota Camry 9th Generation - Toyota Petition Cover.png

This image is COM:SPAM for the a change.org petition started by the uploader. Apart from being spam, it is of questionable copyright status as no source was given for the two images contained within. - ZLEA _T\^C 16:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom + out of scope. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)

Permission of each painter needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2019112210003186 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 14:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)

not own work. Permission is needed

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 04:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)

problematic images:

File:Nikolai Kormašov Eestimaa Teed 1986.jpg - permission from the artist is needed

Other images are thumbnails, unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 1kasutaja (talk · contribs)

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lithuanian Flag project - September 1917.svg

Duplicate of File:Flag of Lithuania during the Vilnius Conference.svg. – Sbaio (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SRL Diagnostics Logo.png

The Brand "SRL DIagnostics" Logo is Different than this logo. 146.196.37.70 17:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indian foreign service GOI.jpg

This is the official emblem of Republic of India and cannot be used for a specific civil service. There is officially NO logo or emblem for "Indian Foreign Service". No logo or emblem has been approved by Cabinet of India, Ministry of Personnel GOI. The IRS has an official logo but Foreign Service does not. Additionally, this image has been directly lifted out of Google Images without any copyright information or Government of India certifying it for official purposes. This image needs to be deleted for lack of verified sources and non availability of federal Government of India stamp or authentication. 2405:201:4005:914E:51BB:8376:412F:2E9E 13:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - In use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian foreign service GOI.jpg

THis is not the official logo of the Indian Foreign Service. Which link or source of Government of India says that this is the official seal. logo and trandemark of Indian Foreign Service. This image has been stolen from the internet. The user should give written permission for the copyright of this image or this image should be deleted. A similar image has been deleted before but has been posted here again. Thanks. 122.171.19.146 19:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brilsmurf (01).jpg

Violation of COM:TOYS. Copyrighted character. (Oinkers42) (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

waarom juist deze verwijderen, geldt dat dan niet ook voor al die andere smurfen in Category:Smurfs? Alle afbeeldingen van smurfpoppetjes met een houten achtergrond in deze Category:Smurfs characters, zijn door mij gemaakt van poppetjes die ik zelf in mijn bezit heb.--Agaath (talk) 20:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deze brilsmurf wordt op 4 plaatsen gebruikt. Worden al die gebruikers daar ook van op de hoogte gesteld en of hun mening gevraagd?--Agaath (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soviet Anthem 1943.webm

This file was initially tagged by PizzaKing13 as Copyvio (Copyright) and the most recent rationale was: violation|1=False own work claim. Is not public domain in Russia per COM:RUSSIA, no proof of otherwise PD or CC

Converting to DR to make undeletion easier. Composition is not PD in Russia. Abzeronow (talk) 21:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🖕 All my hard work for nothing! IT'S JUST A FECKIN' VIDEO MAN! 🖕 ILoveDenpaMen48 (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution is appreciated, but copyright can be complex (the video itself might be fine, the song composition though is definitely still in coyright) and copyright terms are generally long. Don't worry though, this file would eventually be restored when the song's copyright expires. Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: this composition is public domain in Russia if Alexander Alexandrov died in 1946. エルコボラ (話す) 02:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of the lyricists died in 2009 though. Abzeronow (talk) 15:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The USSR and Russian anthem are exempt from copyright even if the author did not work for the government according to Russian law. One type of exempt works is:

State emblems and official signs (flags, armorial bearings, decorations, monetary signs and other State symbols and official signs).

This means any state symbol (insignia, monetary signs, stamps, or national anthems) is not copyrighted even if the government didn't make it, but not every government work is exempt (e.g. files of Soviet Central Television logos were deleted even if this is state media). A national anthem is unanimously a state symbol, and the definition of a "state" is not restricted to currently existing states. Thus, the Soviet anthem is not copyrighted.

As for the film, the general term applies to films, now that we know this isn't the uploader's own work and the author is unknown, we must look at the term as of 1996:

Standard: Life+50 years
Anonymous and pseudonymous works: Publish+50 years
Posthumous works: Publish+50 years

So this film published in 1943 fell into the public domain in 1994 and the copyright extension only occured in 2004, so this is PD in both Russia and the US. VTSGsRock (talk) 02:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1986 Dennis 4x4 in Beige, Front Right, 04-03-2022.jpg

Request by uploader: Filename is inaccurate, photo is low quality and does not effectively represent the vehicle, the car was not the model I thought it was and there are already far better photos of this model of car on commons. Elise240SX (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JohnMelvin Paris2006.jpg

Unused image of non-notable person: en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John K. Melvin Nutshinou ^Talk! 23:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3 Italy logos

COM:TOO UK (the "Three" brand is registered in UK), like File:Drei Austria.svg, File:Three Ireland logo.svg, File:3Fiber Infostrada.png, File:3 Hong Kong logo.svg --InterComMan (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although "Three" brand is registered in UK, in my opinion this is Italian logo, not British. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/23

July 23

Files found with Special:Search/Diaka Camara

Files uploaded by Море77 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by غريب1 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by غريب1 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by غريب1 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by 1kasutaja (talk · contribs)

3 Italy logos

Navigation menu

Search