Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

July 24

[edit]

COM:PRINCE, I mean COM:PENIS and probably not an own work. 186.172.206.145 02:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The building was competed in 1940 by Alar Kotli (1904–1963) and Erika Nõva (1905–1987). There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2058.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment In case this DR is deleted-decided, some of the images might be uploaded locally to the wikipedias, where they are currently used, provided FoP is generally accepted, such as on :de, :tr, etc. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain
This signature is believed to be ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it falls below the required level of originality for copyright protection both in the United States and in the source country (if different). In this case, the source country (e.g. the country of nationality of the signatory) is believed to be South Korea.
Note that this tag cannot be used on all signatures, as not all signatures are copyright-free.
See Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag for an explanation of when the tag may be used.
This is the license stated as every other celebrity signatures that's uploaded on here Mikikooo (talk) 10:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free 2D works in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

complex logo, need permission via COM:VRT Wdwd (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo aus einem Katalog von 1987. Der Verlag existiert seit 1989 nicht mehr. Ein Rechtsnachfolger ist nicht bekannt. 2003:FC:D71E:3B84:C1AB:7DB7:C67A:DB6 11:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's below the threshold of originality. Andrek02 (talk) 08:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Liquid Television episode featuring the short, it is listed as having a distributor, meaning it is probably copyrighted. RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 09:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation: claimed as own work, while admitting it is taken from "Ivan Bratko's book" Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Trizek as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The source image is not under free-licence. This is not the source. Yann (talk) 12:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what could be better? The photo is the same photos as on the company website, and it represents a product sold by the company. It is difficult to have something better. :) Trizek from FR 15:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are 3 possibilities, and among them 2 would be OK for us: 1. It was copied from another website; 2. The uploader is the photographer, and also uploaded it to rousseau-web.com; 3. The uploader is the photographer, and someone else uploaded it to rousseau-web.com. Yann (talk) 18:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Come on, you know how it works how corporate photos are taken and how newbies pick any random image, actually better than I do. I don't get why this obvious copyvio case is not that obvious to you. Trizek from FR 09:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AndreyA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia except architecture

Quick1984 (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Possibly above COM:TOO Ghana, Jonteemil (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a simple logo with a star and some letters, so I think it is not an object of copyright in respect to US law. عبدالله Abdallah (talk) 14:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Files on Commons need to be free in both the US and the country of origin, in this case Ghana. So if we can't prove that it's below TOO in Ghana, it has to be deleted even if it's below TOO in the US. Jonteemil (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:FOP India,

* "Not OK. For copyrighted 2D (paintings, drawings, maps, pictures, engravings, etc.)- Under the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957, as amended up to Act No. 27 of 2012)" Ooligan (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No source at all, probable copyright infringement. Found an identical copy in Tagliavini 1982: in that case the license would be wrong. Carnby (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This sign was made by an employee of the United States Government and as such is Public Domain (PD). This market is owned and controlled by the U.S. Depapartment of Agriculture (USDA). @A1Cafel, See: https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/initiatives/usda-farmers-market [1].
Also see the USDA logo "VegU" and vegetable education program is seen here: https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/initiatives/usda-farmers-market/usda-farmers-markets-vegu-program [2]. That page states,
  • "VegU is a produce education program launched in 2016 by USDA Farmers Market. Learn to properly grow, pick, prepare and store produce at free weekly 10-minute demos at the USDA Farmers Market on the corner of 14th St SW and Independence Ave SW." (emphasis added).
-- Ooligan (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Please, Rev del the original. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete All that remains after cropping is a blurry useless mess. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The foreground is in focus and beyond is and boat and the Pocomoke River, which is designated as a "Scenic" river by the State of Maryland. Ooligan (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
River was largely obscured by the blurry useless mess, we do have better options to illustrate the river. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo published in Italy in 1984. Currently it is in the public domain in the country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this file. Günther Frager (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Invalid copyright template: This is a 2D copy of a copyrighted work (Daszewski died in 1971, copyright expires in 2042); the mentioned copyright law exception does not apply to drawings. Ankry (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Ankry (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • "zgodnie z art. 3 ustawy z dnia 29 marca 1926 r. oraz art. 2 ustawy z dnia 10 lipca 1952 r. o prawie autorskim fotografie polskich autorów (lub fotografie, które ukazały się po raz pierwszy w Polsce lub równocześnie w Polsce i za granicą) opublikowane bez wyraźnego zastrzeżenia praw autorskich przed uchwaleniem ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych nie podlegają ochronie – należy domniemywać, że są własnością publiczną". MOs810 (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modern architecture. No free license from the architect / sculptor. No FoP for interiors in Poland.

Ankry (talk) 19:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if File:20231006 Transfiguration Catholic Church Katowice Poland 01.jpg violates any copyright. Neither altar nor stained glasses is a main subject of copyright (altar is far away and no stained glass in fully depicted), a cross is to simple shaped to be copyrighted and benches are utilitarian objects. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Utworem chronionym jest w tym przypadku architektura wnętrza. Oczywiście można twierdzić, że nie przedstawia ona cech utworu, tyle że wtedy wchodzimy na bardzo grząski grunt rozważań, czy architektura modernistyczna jest twórcza, czy też nie. Ja bym jednak uznał że jest, bo jeżeli nie, to wyrzucamy spory kawałek sztuki (?) współczesnej, od supermatyzmu poczynając :) --Teukros (talk) 21:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From https://www.reddit.com/r/polandball/comments/29k33g/polandball_map_of_the_world_2014/, file at given source doesn't seem to have the rights to publish this image under a CC license Nutshinou Talk! 21:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The site from where I extracted the image specifies that the content there is under a CC license. Universalis (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but it doesn't look like the author of that Reddit post published that themselves to said website. https://zhpolandball.miraheze.org/wiki/File:Reddit_brain4breakfast_Polandball_Map_of_the_World_2014.png says ATicketToTomorrow uploaded it, not brain4breakfast Nutshinou Talk! 11:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]