Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

August 25

[edit]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating because this restoration was deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Behind the Door (1919).webm. I am neutral. Prospectprospekt (talk) 21:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Movie is in the public domain. I don't think coloring is creative enough, even when it is itself derivative of the original prints (as stated in the previous nomination). Had the musicalized version been uploaded it would have certainly been deleted, but this muted version is completely fine as it is firmly in the public domain in the US. --Bedivere (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although the original movie is public domain, this particular restoration apparently contains new copyrightable elements: "No single, complete, copy of the film is known to survive. This restoration is based [on] an incomplete 35mm print and a separate small roll of shots preserved at the Library of Congress National Audio-Visual Conservation Center, and a 35mm copy of a Russian version, based on an export negative preserved at Gosfilmofond of Russia. In two sequences, still images have been inserted to bridge gaps where motion picture material was not available. Shot continuity and text for re-created intertitles and bridging stills are based on director Irvin Willat's original script and continuity. Color tinting and toning have [been] reproduced based on the laboratory notations in the leaders of the Library of Congress print." Thus the new editing, bridging sections, recreated intertitles, and possibly tinting are copyrighted. Nosferattus (talk) 01:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Element not properly shown/rendered, look at the following file - Mod creator (talk) 01:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nothing but uninteresting clouds Mateus2019 (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cited source "permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with." but does not state commercial reuse or modification. Licenses that are -NC or -ND are not allowed on commons DMacks (talk) 03:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's a whole set from that article:

DMacks (talk) 03:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a test-DR for a set of many such uploads from Frontiers journal that have the same or similar license terms. Some articles in that journal do explicitly say CC, but others only say "use" without explicitly releasing the full suite of CC license. DMacks (talk) 03:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background wouldn't be below COM:TOO#China. Ahri Boy (talk) 03:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, requesting a wordmark of the game as replacement. Ahri Boy (talk) 03:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I'll just upload a box art to the English Wikipedia as Fair Use instead. SuperGrey (talk) 08:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. You already did XD. SuperGrey (talk) 08:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I participated in volunteer activities to support the earthquake relief efforts in Japan through art. I was the actual photographer, and I have permission from Fuzuki Arai, the organizer, and all the people involved in the temporary housing where the photos were taken.
https://araifuzuki.com/en/flowerproject/index.html 221.255.158.57 06:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are the uploader, please log in to comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text only. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Scientific publication are in scope. Yann (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please point to the Commons guideline that says unused text files are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

La qualité de la photo n'est pas bonne. Je veux la remplacer par une meilleure photo. Vincentdesgms (talk) 08:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He's not Kranthikumar Kavsjkumar (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ライセンス選択を間違えたため。 Nagata yamato (talk) 11:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

glitched version of File:Tvp2 hd.png AshOregano (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate|TVP3 Gorzów Wielkopolski (od 2 stycznia 2016).svg}} AshOregano (talk) 11:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate|TVP3 Gorzów Wielkopolski (od 2 stycznia 2016).svg}} AshOregano (talk) 11:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate|TVP ABC 2 (2022).svg}} AshOregano (talk) 11:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate|TVP.Info.HD.png}} AshOregano (talk) 11:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ライセンス選択を間違えたため。 Nagata yamato (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Andyphan100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Are these really simple enough?

Yann (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: First page of Piotr Lenartwicz book of shanties. 1970, second edition This may be PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 11:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as copyvio anyway. Yann I am grateful for your intervention. Perhaps it might be useful for you to expand here on "This may be PD-ineligible". This is a new concept for me and very likely to be new to the uploader. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent: Please see Template:PD-ineligible. Just a few words are not enough to create a copyright. Yann (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Thank you. I believe that as the "First page of Piotr Lenartwicz book of shanties. 1970, second edition" which is a published work it is an inherent part of a copyright work, inseparable from it (by binding), and this forms the basis of my assertion that I believe it to be a copyvio. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, copyright doesn't work that way. The whole book is certainly under a copyright, but a single page with a few words may not be. Yann (talk) 14:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • In case it is of importance: I looked at this shanties book and there is no copyright notice in it. It was published in 1970. The publisher was Ż. K. T. (sailing club) "Rejsy". Puncinus (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a duplicate file of https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Minister_of_State_for_Human_Resource_Development,_Smt._D._Purandeswari_at_the_%E2%80%9CUniversities_of_India%E2%80%9D_conclave,_in_Bangalore_on_January_24,_2009.jpg#mw-jump-to-license 1WikiCont (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The author of this photo is unknow, so we cannot be sure that he died before 1954. Leokand (talk) 11:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo qualifies under criterion 2 of the attached Russian public domain tag ("This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym..."). Neither the source cited for the image attributes an author nor does the full image from which this photo was extracted. Furthermore, in at least two earlier republications, attribution was not designated: in Georgiy Sviridov (1972; Arnold Sokhor) and Muzyka kak sudba (2002; Sviridov, ed. Alexander Belonenko). —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its my school logo, im a headteacher at this school Elaksamana (talk) 12:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WikiFer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These PDFs all appear to be out of COM:SCOPE for Commons, being nothing educational other than raw text.

Belbury (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose All PDF files uploaded are within the scope of this project to serve as the basis of a reliable and verifiable source. See COM:SCOPE: However, Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects, so scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects (e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source) are in scope. Furthmore, these PDF files are in no way related to content for other Wikimedia projects. Therefore, these appointments are in accordance with the Commons rules. Finally, the proponent of this discussion just forgot to finish writing the item mentioned: Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource. It's not the case of these PDFs! WikiFer (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The person who sent me the image File:Cartel de defy par les escoliers des petites escoles - Orthographe française.jpg in its version of 20 August 2024 at 11:31 would like us to remove this version with his name associated with the comment: ‘Communiquée par Mme Lévecque-Stankiewicz’. I was not authorised to publish this version.

Is it possible to delete only one version of the image? If not, can we delete the associated commentary?

Best regards! --Etienne M (talk) 14:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate|Alfa TVP (2022).svg}} AshOregano (talk) 16:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

glitched duplicate of TVP Polonia Logo 2020.svg AshOregano (talk) 16:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of own work. Seems to have been extracted from https://www.billienz.com/culture/my-version-jane-wills-shortland-street TheBritinator (talk) 17:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo only appears as a still insert in the YouTube video from which the image captured; it's likely to be third-party material incorporated into the video under fair use. As a single image, the original copyright would apply, not the CC licence of the video. Paul_012 (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Polaris Dawn mission shares its images under a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license. RickyCourtney (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who has the copyright of this Official Press Photo? No metadata. See also here where is mentioned "Image: Courtesy of Bria Fleming". Wouter (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.fluminense.com.br/noticia/fluminense-acerta-a-contratacao-de-kevin-serna exact same user has uploaded exact same image as was deleted before (check my contribution history). This is a grave refusal of respecting others' copyrights, and of following Wikipedia Commons policy. Surely this is worth a block? Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Is the new version of Bibendum in the public domain? This logo is from France so it is not trivial per COM:TOO France Tbhotch 20:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]