Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/25

24 July 2024

26 July 2024

Deletion requests on 25 July 2024

July 25

File:Juan Taborcía.jpg

Quien es? 186.174.95.57 02:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taborcía and Gómez.jpg

Quienes son? 186.174.95.57 02:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teatro Municipal, Treinta y Tres.jpg

Extraída desde Flickr. La licencia otorgada por quien la subió expresa que “el archivo multimedia es de dominio público en los Estados Unidos . Esto se aplica a obras estadounidenses” siendo que el archivo no es una obra estadounidense, si no de propiedad de la Biblioteca Nacional. Estaré más atento en las próximas subidas desde la plataforma JacobinoWunsh (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Extracted from Flickr. The license granted by the uploader states that “the multimedia file is in the public domain in the United States. This applies to American works” since the archive is not an American work, but rather property of the National Library of Uruguay, made by Aníbal Pintos. I will be more attentive in the next uploads from the platform" --RAN (talk) 16:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Switched from PD-US to PD worldwide. No need to nominate for deletion when a simple fix is available. --RAN (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goutam1962 (talk · contribs)

I spent considerable time examining these two images, but I couldn't identify their educational value within the scope of the project.

iMahesh (talk) 13:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Goutam1962 (talk · contribs)

These images depict 2D/3D art or text displayed at a temporary exhibition. According to the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, Section 52(t) does not cover artistic works displayed in temporary exhibitions; it only applies to works permanently situated in public places. Additionally, there is no verifiable permission from the artists or the exhibition organizers to release these images under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Therefore, these uploads violate the copyright of the original artists and do not comply with Wikimedia Commons' licensing policies. At a minimum, permission from the exhibition organizer is required, as it is often challenging to identify individual artists in a folk exhibition.

iMahesh (talk) 02:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flaccid adult circumcised penis (small).jpg

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ademas flaccido! Deleting. 186.175.191.80 14:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marguerite Sauvage by Gage Skidmore.jpg

Hello, please delete this photo, this is a portrait of me I didn't know I was photographed at this time and didn't give my authorisation to use my portrait, thanks 2603:8000:A600:AA00:E445:F86C:F364:3C44 03:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info: Available on https://flickr.com/photos/22007612@N05/53762625156. --Achim55 (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use, only free licensed photo we have of notable person with articles about them in 3 languages. Apparently taken at event in USA where such photos are allowed. Again: If notable people wish to avoid having mediocre snapshots of them used in Wikimedia, the best way is to make sure good quality photo(s) they approve of shared under a free license are available for use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks like taken at a public events in a non-problematic situation. Happens every day and I don't think any permission is needed here --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:【苗栗景點】泰安戀情溫泉會館 (30563507554).jpg

Copyrighted poster in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nativeplants Botanical Garden 26.jpg

Because it is Breach of Freedom of Panorama Mbaye Boye (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How so? Appears to be a photo of a moth on a wall. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christmas sign with lorem ipsum.jpg

Copyrighted poster in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 03:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Sculpture of Geoffroy la Grand Dent (Maillezais)

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016-11-10新北-無敵拉麵 (30781786802).jpg

Copyrighted poster in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 03:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Posters in Nandrin

Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters "Posters are normally copyright-protected even if the artist is unknown. Thus, images of posters cannot usually be accepted." Also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Belgium says only works placed on a permanent basis in public places qualify for FOP. Posters inherently aren't permanent works though. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Republic's flag.png

Out of scope: fictitious flag (cf. https://micronations.wiki/wiki/Repubblica_della_Base_dei_Bambù). Omphalographer (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Flag of Khalistan (Sikh Homeland).png

Out of scope: unused low-quality duplicate of File:Flag-of-Khalistan.svg (which predates this file). Omphalographer (talk) 08:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Free at Last (5348588795).jpg

Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Poster is work of the European Union government per {{European Union Government}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free at Last (5348588795).jpg

This image was nominated for deletion last year but was kept because it is supposedly freely licensed by the European Union. Per the European Union Commission Decision European Union Commission Decision, which the permission section of the file links to, the decision pertains to "the reuse of Commission documents." Further, the document specifically says "This Decision determines the conditions for the reuse of documents held by the Commission or on its behalf by the Publications Office of the European Union (the Publications Office) with the aim of facilitating a wider reuse of information." So the permission clearly isn't valid since posters are not informational "documents." Adamant1 (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the legal language that makes clear that this is not informational? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poland regions travel map revised (Edited).png

This file was initially tagged by Belbury as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 08:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The tag was because the image is described as an edited version of the map of Poland without specifying what original map it is referring to. Belbury (talk) 08:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The source image is, unsurprisingly, File:Poland regions travel map revised.png (which is itself based on File:Poland Regions map.png), and the "edits" appear to be assigning different colors to some of the voivodeships (provinces) of Poland. All of these maps are attempts to organize the voivodeships into arbitrary "regions", and have been questioned previously on that front (cf. File talk:Poland Regions map.png). This edited version has no clear logic behind it and isn't in use, and should be deleted on that basis. Omphalographer (talk) 18:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the problem isn't copyright-related, then COM:INUSE applies. The file isn't in use now, of course, as it was removed by the Commons delinker after deletion. What arbitrary regions to use in the travel guide is up to the Wikivoyage community; voy:en:Talk:Poland is the place to discuss that, and it has indeed been discussed. –LPfi (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep goodness please stop using non-sequiteur arguments to justify deleting perfectly in-scope files. There is no copyright-related issue as far as I can see here. --SHB2000 (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, leave Wikivoyage alone when there's no legal need to mess with us. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fedor Malykhin.jpg

Невозможно распознать объект Степан Мильчевский (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is nonsense. Object clearly identifiable via shirt number. Xgeorg (talk) 10:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canadian National 7312.JPG

It’s copyrighted by RRPictureArchives.NET and was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons likely without permission by the actual owner of the image Mr Mines Engine (talk) 10:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of this image and uploaded it myself. O484 (talk) 15:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O484, what do you mean by "owner"? Did you shoot the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I took this photo myself. O484 (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I guess to demonstrate that, you should contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICJ South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention).jpg

Hello. Please wait a little bit as I sent an email to the IJC media center and still waiting for a response. Freedom's Falcon (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frölunda Hockey.gif

Redundant to File:Frölunda.png. Jonteemil (talk) 12:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Burkpojken (talk · contribs)

Out of scope and possible copyright issues as well.

Jonteemil (talk) 12:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salaamathi.ogg

Recording made in 1979, the stated licence is false and the work won’t be in public domain until at least 2029. Polyna V. (talk) 13:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a possibility of obtaining permission from the copyright holder or a legal representative to host the file under an appropriate license, this should be pursued to maintain access to this historically significant work. Ismehela (talk) 00:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ismehela: Let us know how you get on with that. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Polyna V.: From where do you get the 1979 date? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is what the British Library, which is the source of that recording, claims. ‘The musicians that you can hear are the surviving members of the royal band of the Sultanate of Maldives, recorded in 1979 by Hassan Ahmed Maniku.’ Polyna V. (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le chanoine Granger.png

wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 14:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LOUISE EN HIVER - Biligen.jpg

Copyrighted work. No proof of permission. 2A01:CB14:B11:7200:BD2F:4D4:FCEA:7FD6 14:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti, Market St (158728378).jpg

Copyrighted art per this website, https://www.graffiti.org/hyde/hyde_3.html (see photo near the bottom right of this webpage). COM:PCP. Ooligan (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Bahnhof Laudenbach (Württ)

It is unlikely that images from more than 70 years ago are the own work of the uploader. Therefore, I don't think we can keep those without any further provenance information.

Felix QW (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for all. speculation (~unlikely) is not a reason for deletion. -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 00:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I know that the uploader is probably an older guy, so could have been already around in 1951/52, but File:Laudenbach2.jpg very much looks like a scan of a bad photocopy (with caption), making me doubt that it is actually the uploader's "own work" as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esse Chua 2017 (Unsplash).jpg

We know that its source granted the relevant license. Do you have any reason to think the uploader at the source was not the photographer? Plenty of people don't pay attention to their EXIF data. - Jmabel ! talk 17:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, "plenty of people don't pay attention to their EXIF data", but in my experience, very very few images here on Commons have an explicit "All rights reserved" message in the EXIF data. A sampling of other photos by this user on Unsplash did not have this statement in the metadata... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't see any reason to doubt that the photographer released this image under a free license on Unsplash; the potentially inadvertent inclusion of a copyright statement in the image metadata doesn't annul that. (We run into similar situations occasionally where a book is released by the author under a free license, but still contains statements like "all rights reserved" or "reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited" on its copyright page.) Omphalographer (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prater SV.png

Unlikely that uploader is the original author of logo and has authority to license it. Apparently above relevant TOO COM:TOO Austria Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASV Hohenau.png

Unlikely that uploader is the original author of logo and has authority to license it. Apparently above relevant TOO COM:TOO Austria Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harland 1922-23.jpg

dubious license claim; apparent 1920s photo, needs actual source info to determine actual copyright status Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly an old postcard. Copy for sale here, but no additional details about creation. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASKÖ Oedt.png

Unlikely that uploader is the original author of logo and has authority to license it. Apparently above relevant TOO COM:TOO Austria Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heineken Champions Cup CoreLogo 3C CMYK OnLight.png

It already exists in Wikicommons (Heineken Champions Cup.png), and does not comply with copyright. SkyRugby (talk) 16:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman Środa grób.jpg

Na przedstawionym zdjęciu nie ma grobu piosenkarza Romana Środy. Jest On pochowany we wcześniejszym grobie. Opublikowane zdjęcie prezentuje grób kogoś anonimowego. Mateusz Opasiński (talk) 17:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo możliwe że popełniłem błąd wiec spokojnie możesz usunąć grób jeśli masz zdjęcie tego właściwego.Lukasz2 (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dawa Yangzum Sherpa (cropped).jpg

This is not Dawa Yangzum Sherpa. It is the wife Dawa of Chhiring Dorje Sherpa. This woman is not prominent, so it makes no sense to have a cropped version of her. Redrobsche (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copy of Copy of DSC 0000046.jpg

very poor quality image of what is billed as "old cairo"? Out of scope -- Deadstar (msg) 19:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Sky Deutschland Bundesliga package logos

The Bundesliga logo is copyrighted and I think it's too big to be covered by COM:De minimis.

Jonteemil (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svalyava gerb.png

Non-free image from http://www.svalyava.org/ (that URL is now usurped; see http://web.archive.org/web/20150223092945/http://www.svalyava.org/ instead) ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 20:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All officially approved coats of arms and flags of the settlements are in the public domain and are free from copyright according to the legislation of Ukraine. The coat of arms of Svaliava shown here was approved on September 15, 2000 by the decision of the City Council. Vity OKM, 00:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svalava emblem.jpg

Non-free image from http://www.svalyava.org/ (that URL is now usurped; see http://web.archive.org/web/20150223092945/http://www.svalyava.org/ instead) ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 20:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dampierre-en-Bray-FR-76-salle Jacques Moinet-02.jpg

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in France. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 22:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Si l'on supprime tout ce qui, de près ou de loin est nouveau en France, il ne restera rien. Le bâtiment n'est pas très original et ne ressemble en rien à une œuvre unique d'artiste. Il va falloir, aussi, nous expliquer qui est l’architecte et en quoi sommes nous certain qu'il n'est pas décédé depuis plus de 70 ans.

Hello, if you delete everything that is new in France, there will be nothing left. The building is not very original and does not look like a unique work of art. We will also have to explain who the architect is and how we are certain that he has not died for more than 70 years. --François GOGLINS (talk) 07:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It looks original enough to me. And what will remain is everything that is in the public domain or is a properly licensed photo that doesn't have a copyrighted work as its subject. It's not true, though, that there's no freedom of panorama in France; the only issue is that "the French parliament approved a law recognizing a limited version of the freedom of panorama that authorizes the reproduction by individuals (not organizations) of buildings and sculptures permanently located in public space, but only for non-commercial utilizations." Commons requires commercial FOP and it can't be limited to individuals. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/25

July 25

Files uploaded by Goutam1962 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Goutam1962 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Sculpture of Geoffroy la Grand Dent (Maillezais)

Files in Category:Posters in Nandrin

Files uploaded by Burkpojken (talk · contribs)

Files found with Special:Search/Bahnhof Laudenbach (Württ)

Files in Category:Sky Deutschland Bundesliga package logos

Navigation menu

Search