Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/26

25 August 2024

27 August 2024

Deletion requests on 26 August 2024

August 26

File:Depiction of the Battle of Ħal Tarxien, 1759.webp

Out of scope: AI-generated "painting" being used to support a likely hoax draft on enwiki Omphalographer (talk) 00:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. AI generated images are absolutly unsuitable to illustrate historic events. Carl Ha (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And even less suitable to illustrate hoaxes. Omphalographer (talk) 22:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MrHerii (talk · contribs)

Unused, personal, fictional flags and one fictional logo, out of the project scope

Nutshinou ^Talk! 01:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-United Arab Emirates photo

This template is irrelevant because the UAE copyright laws exclude works published before March 1993 from copyright protection due to non-retroactivity. I created Template:PD-United Arab Emirates-1993 to replace this redundant template VTSGsRock (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please remove all translusions of this template. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the only one. VTSGsRock (talk) 03:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathy Engelbert WNBA Commissioner May 2019.jpg

Also used and was published in 2019 by Getty Images. George Ho (talk) 03:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010s collage v21.png

One of the images in the collage was deleted A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deleting the collage, the deleted image should be replaced and then the file get a Template:Overwritten revdel. This doesn't mean the collage is good. It's currently used a lot, and could be improved via new versions or derivatives and its uses be replaced. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Commons:Deletion requests/File:İD bayrağı ile bir militan.jpg Stop deleting collages due to one image deleted. Replace or remove the guilty image instead. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BorritotirroB (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious flags, coats of arms, etc.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pacote de açúcar.jpg

copyrighted illustration Hjmd56825 (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MackRutherford Macksolo 240822©BeatriceDeSmet 0091.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 04:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be interesting to know why there is a "no permission" tag on these pictures considering "Beadsy", who posted the pictures stands for BEAtrice De Smet (BEADS-Y), legal author-photographer and owner of the pictures. She has therefore the right and needs no permission to publish these pictures. The deletion request should therefore be ignored. Beadsy (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Beadsy you could go through the COM:VRT process to address the issue. Nakonana (talk) 08:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MackRutherford Macksolo 260822©BeatriceDeSmet 0236.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 04:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be interesting to know why there is a "no permission" tag on these pictures considering "Beadsy", who posted the pictures stands for BEAtrice De Smet (BEADS-Y), legal author-photographer and owner of the pictures. She has therefore the right and needs no permission to publish these pictures. The deletion request should therefore be ignored. Beadsy (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyber Yodhaa.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Stores-Discount (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo VORTICE.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Game Science logo.png

COM:TOO China Nostalgiacn (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's fine... ltbdl (talk) 06:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As per the examples provided in COM:TOO China, the shape of the spermatozoid and the writing of the studio's name seem to me to range in « not copyrightable for lacking originality ». --Alecto Chardon (talk) 09:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per Alecto Chardon. Meanwhile, the logo itself could be updated with this version. —— Eric Liu_（Talk） 09:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it exceeds COM:TOO China (c.f. the Gang Heng logo and LY logo examples which are even more simple yet still are protected). The current logo contains irregular shapes (e.g. the tadpole-like object) showing originality whereas the simpler protected logos are merely simple letters and ovals. A court of law is very likely to rule such a logo to be protected by copyright. --Wcam (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i didn't know you can tell what a court of law would think. ltbdl (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, COM:PCP. Wcam (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
there isn't significant doubt. ltbdl (talk) 07:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: You can refer to the situation of Monsanto's logo. The Monsanto logo with a complete pattern was deleted, while the pure text logo was retained. You can re-upload a pure text layout logo. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MonsantoCompany.png. --Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free Education For All logo.svg

I created this image by extracting it from https://sato-yumi.jp/pdf/A4_200240430.pdf. Initially, I thought this image was in the public domain, but this may be a misconception. Because this image is a derivative work of the non-free PDF file. Momiji-Penguin (talk) 06:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to be a clear case of {{PD-Textlogo}} to me. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chilatiao01 (talk · contribs)

4 out of 5 are evidently screenshots. user probably created none of these.

RZuo (talk) 06:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Strindbergsmuseet

Not own works as claimed, but derivatives, no FoP in Sweden for information boards.

Quick1984 (talk) 07:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gulliver in Liliput, Bremen.jpg

The photographer doesn't have rights to the mural, and per the policy on recreations of 2d works, it should be deleted. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As an outdoor mural, this seems to be allowable per COM:FOP Germany. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guipel - place Duine - boîte à livres.jpg

The person that sent me the picture on my website had not understood what an open license image means and had taken a screenshot from Street view, which is then copyrighted. Please remove this image, sorry. Symac (talk) 07:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And there is a second one with the same issue that has to be removed for the same reason : File:Fresnoy-la-Rivière - bus face à la mairie - boîte à livres.jpg. Sorry ! Symac (talk) 07:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saycon .jpg

porque no es utill 45.4.138.114 07:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haj-ahmad-panahian-۲.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Voiceofboi (talk · contribs)

User with bad history, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 08:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo coq Wallonie.svg

Demande de suppression à la demande de son auteur. Risque de confusion avec un logo officiel établi par une autorité publique (https://www.wallonie.be/fr/demarches/se-renseigner-sur-la-charte-graphique-de-la-wallonie). Sthubertliege (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ushkuiniks Flag.png

Fake flag. There is no evidence in scientific books that such a flag has been ever used by the Ushkuiniks Leokand (talk) 08:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Filip Osselaer.jpg

No permission from given author - Author Hervé Debaene Hoyanova (talk) 09:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riedel Glas logo.svg

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren alsvertreter der Marke RIEDEL, muss ich Ihnen mitteilen, dass dieses Logo falsch ist und nicht verwendet werden darf. Gerne übermittle ich Ihnen das richtige Logo, aber biette entfernen Sie dieses. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Rosita Leuprecht, om@riedel.com 80.93.37.92 09:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ist das Logo grundsätzlich falsch oder nur einfach veraltet? In letzterem Fall wäre das kein Löschgrund, denn wir behalten auch historische Logos. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the description "Historisches Logo", COM:INUSE and PD-textlogo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosariocentral equipo v mineiro 1995.jpg

Photo published in Argentina in 1995. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin (25 years after publication), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Fma12 (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAS uniform by Calvin Klein.jpg

photo of a photo, name of original photographer not stated, license is probably out of the blue Mateus2019 (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was uploaded with all the information provided in the original Flickr upload (license included, no individual photographer credited). This appears to be a clean scan and not a photo of a photo. ChonkyTomcat (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rubens Crowning of Saint Catherine.jpg

very bad quality, very low resolution better File:Peter Paul Rubens - Crowning of Saint Catherine - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Peter Paul Rubens - The Crowning of St Catherine - WGA20254.jpg Oursana (talk) 10:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Darne machine gun

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finite state machine

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Type 81 (squad machine gun)

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poppies and dandelions.webm

not useful; gives a wrong impression what the file is showing (a video of the flowers field) from title+thumbnail; somewhat misleading Prototyperspective (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The file can be renamed if needed, but I'm also not sure of its usefulness. It's not a video of a flower field but rather a video of an animation on a static flower field background. Nakonana (talk) 09:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kildall 801lighthouse.jpg

I do not know if freedom of panorama applies Puncinus (talk) 11:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No freedom of panorama for this, but I think the sign text is right on the cusp of being too simple for copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery. Hotel del Monte. 1889.jpg

Old picture that is in the Trotter gallery, but not my work Puncinus (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is highly probable that this is of sufficient age to be out of copyright 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery Window Stained.jpg

Picture of a window in the Trotter gallery, but not my work Puncinus (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless this can be demonstrated to be out of copyright, or otherwise licenced to be here. COM:PCP applies 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Stained glass windows are an architectural element allowable under US freedom of panorama. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery. pacific Grove. Granville Redmond section.jpg

Granville Redmond picture (top) and his artifacts. He died in 1935, but I do not know if it is still copyrighted. Not my work. Puncinus (talk) 11:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redmond died long enough ago to suggest that this derivative work may be out of copyright. However, the copyright is sometimes passed to the originator's estate. I believe that COM:PCP woudl suggest that this may only remain with proofs of right to upload lodged through COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruton House 1240 St. Charles Street Plaque.jpg

This is my picture but plaque itself was created by Alameda Architectual Preservation Society. I do not know if it is copyrighted or not Puncinus (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The date of 2016 and the fact that the plaque has in all probability been manufactured at approximately that date suggests that this item is in copyright, thus the derivate work cannot remain. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The question really is about the threshold of originality here. This is a very short factual bit of text. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Four Apostles by Albrecht Dürer (5986729987).jpg

very blurry very bad quality better 4 files File:Albrecht Dürer - The Four Apostles, Saints John, Peter, Mark and Paul.jpg ,File:Durer, quattro apostoli 01.jpg,File:Sts. Paul, Mark, John and Peter by Albrecht Durer - Alte Pinakothek - Munich - Germany 2017.jpg,File:Vier Apostel (Albrecht Duerer).jpg Oursana (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cirque Room Esther Bruton Panorama.jpg

It is one of murals by Brutons. It is in public hotel space. But it is not my work. I am not sure what template to assign or how to do it. Puncinus (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I believe the outcome of this discussion should be to apply the correct licence. I have not expressly voted to keep because I share the nom/uploader's abundance of caution. Note that Bruton died in 1992, but that the murals are not wholly prominent. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Publicly displayed without a copyright notice before 1978. This is {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cirque Room Esther Bruton Zebras.jpg

It is one of murals by Brutons. It is in public hotel space. But it is not my work. I am not sure what template to assign or how to do it. Puncinus (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is a DW of a copyright item. Bruton died in 1992 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Publicly displayed without a copyright notice before 1978. This is {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cirque Room Esther Bruton Tigers.jpg

It is one of murals by Brutons. It is in public hotel space. But it is not my work. I am not sure what template to assign or how to do it. Puncinus (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is a DW of a copyright item. Bruton died in 1992 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Publicly displayed without a copyright notice before 1978. This is {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeological sites of Taiwan

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helen Bruton SPCA mosaic signature.jpg

This is a fragment of Bruton mosaic in SPCA building. Not my work, I just made a photograph. It is most probably covered by freedom of panorama. But I do not how to check it. Puncinus (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Bruton died in 1992 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reasoning at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spca Monterey County Helen Bruton.jpg. This is {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Signature of Margaret Bruton. Monterey Harbor terrazzo.jpg

This is a fragment of Bruton mosaic in Monteray Harbour. Not my work, I just made a photograph. It is most probably covered by freedom of panorama. But I do not how to check it. Puncinus (talk) 11:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Bruton died in 1992 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Signatures are almost always below the threshold of originality in the US. I don't think the plain "background" of the mosaic seen here is sufficiently creative, but this is irrelevant because it is also {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monterey Harbor plaque and sculpture.jpg

This is a fragment of plaque and sculpture. Not my work, I just made a photograph. It is most probably covered by freedom of panorama. But I do not how to check it. Puncinus (talk) 11:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Derivative work which may be covered by FOP. Bruton died in 1992. Wiser heads than mine need to judge this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The bronze statue is a faithful reproduction of the wooden original without copyright notice which was erected in 1960, making this {{PD-US-no notice}}. The text of the plaque is from the City of Monterey, which is {{PD-CAGov}} and the monument's stone base and mosaic elements are dateable to no later than 1971, based on another bronze plaque on the reverse of the base (https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=30347). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air Assault on Japan.jpg

This is not my work. It was commissioned by the US government, but perhaps such sketch is not covered by the US goverment public domain Puncinus (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Questiomj Is this work attributed to Bruton? If so it is a derivative work which may be covered as the nom states. Bruton died in 1983. Wiser heads than mine need to judge this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Luc-CADEDDU.jpg

Français : Clairement pas un autoportrait, photographe et licence inconnus.

English: Clearly not a self-portrait, photographer and license unknown.

VIGNERON (talk) 11:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grass marker of Bruton's sisters at the Cemetery El Encinal in Monterey.jpg

This is a picture I made in the cemetery in Monterey. I do not know who the author is. Puncinus (talk) 11:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless some form of FOP applies. This is copyright of the monumental mason 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Clearly below the threshold of originality in the US. Simple uncreative text carved without embellishment on a simple stone marker. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nativity. Helen Bruton mosaic at Saint James Episcopal Church in Monterey.jpg

This was taken inside the church by me. But there is a mosaic by Bruton which perhaps is copyrighted. Puncinus (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. 1952 date, so this is almost certainly {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaque at the Monterey Peninsula Volunteer Services Benefit Shop on Broadway Ave in Seaside.jpg

This is a plaque in a charity store in Monterey. I made a picture but do not know the author Puncinus (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author of what? This plaque? There's nothing copyrightable about it. Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Text and plaque design are both too simple for copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EFlatau nagrobek 2022 (ver1).jpg

this is my picture from cemetery but I do not know if it is covered by copyright owners Puncinus (talk) 11:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems allowable based on COM:FOP Poland. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anakarolyna.f (talk · contribs)

Unused and unexplained tables; out of project scope. If you need this data in an article, use a text table.

Rosenzweig τ 11:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rzeźba uczonej księgi, eskulapa i kielicha Hygei na nagrobku Edwarda Flataua.jpg

This is a reconstruction of sculpture. It is my picture but there may be copyright M. Lubelski (died in 1965) or even R. Zimek. Puncinus (talk) 11:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vision and prayer by Bednarski.jpg

I made this picture in artist studio with his permission. But it is not my work. Puncinus (talk) 11:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete artist is alive, so his permission may be sought and lodged with COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moby-Dick 1.jpg

I made this picture in artist studio with his permission. But it is not my work. Puncinus (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery. Pacific Grove. Jules Tavernier section.jpg

this is my picture from Trotter Museum. There is fragment of painting which may be copyrighted. Puncinus (talk) 12:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is highly probable that this is of sufficient age to be out of copyright 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery. Pacific Grove. John Steinbeck section.jpg

this is my picture from Trotter Museum. There may be copyrighted material here Puncinus (talk) 12:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The probability here is that Steinbeck's death was insufficimetiy long ago to render these derivative works able to be uploaded here. COM:PCP applies. Proof to the contrary should be supplied to COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery. Pacific Grove. General View. 2024.jpg

this is my picture from Trotter Museum. There may be copyrighted material here Puncinus (talk) 12:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the uploader/nom. COM:PCP suggests caution. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trotter Museum-Gallery. Pacific Grove. E. Charlton Fortune section.jpg

this is my picture from Trotter Museum. There may be copyrighted material here Puncinus (talk) 12:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We are only 50 years after the death of the artist. Equally, they may have passed the copyright to their estate on death. COM:PCP suggests caution. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Return to Philippines.jpg

This is not my work. It was commissioned by the US government, but perhaps such sketch is not covered by the US goverment public domain Puncinus (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Derivative work which may be covered by FOP, perhaps US Government licence arrangements. Bruton died in 1983. Wiser heads than mine need to judge this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brutons grave. Cemetry El Encinal, Monterey.jpg

This is a picture I made in the cemetery in Monterey. I do not know who the author is. Puncinus (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Given the dates on the headstone, the mosaic would be in the public domain per {{PD-US-no notice}}. It is almost certainly the work of their daughter, also named Helen Bell Bruton. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mosaic fragment at Saint James Episcopal Church in Monterey.jpg

This was taken inside the church by me. But there is a fragment of mosaic by Bruton which perhaps is copyrighted. Puncinus (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Bruton sisters died in 1983 and 1992. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. From a 1952 dated mosaic without copyright notice (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nativity. Helen Bruton mosaic at Saint James Episcopal Church in Monterey.jpg). This is in the public domain per {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spca Monterey County Helen Bruton.jpg

this was my picture but not my work. It is a public building and perhaps covered by freedom of panorama, but it may be copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 12:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete DW. G+Bruton died in 1992 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Created in 1967 and displayed publicly without a copyright notice, making this {{PD-US-no notice}} (see also COM:PACUSA). IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flatau eskulap ksiega kielich.jpg

This is a reconstruction of sculpture. It is my picture but there may be copyright M. Lubelski (died in 1965) or even R. Zimek. who did reconstruction Puncinus (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FelixGarcia3.jpg

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FelixGarcia3.jpg

Reupload with previous rationale still standing at Commons:Deletion requests/File:FelixGarcia3.jpg. Also a direct screenshot or photo of a video game. DatGuy (talk) 12:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karl Marx by Krzysztof Bednarski.jpg

I made this picture in artist studio with his permission. But it is not my work. Puncinus (talk) 12:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as DW; artist is alive, so his permission may be sought and lodged with COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vodka label Proletaryat by Bednarski.jpg

I made this picture in artist studio with his permission. But it is not my work. Puncinus (talk) 12:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ewd2014-2016warszawa reytan.jpg

this is not my work Puncinus (talk) 12:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galle Fort Clock Tower.jpg

Facebook? 186.172.245.102 12:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. My own. 2402:4000:2310:28F7:BDC8:994E:B204:83F 13:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Αγ.Γεώργιος και το Ρολόι του Αρχαιολογικού Χώρου Ελευσίνας.jpg

absolutely blurry photo in which nothing can be seen. Completely unnecessary in Wikipedia. Pointless 212.50.53.199 12:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:阮嘉敏.jpg

Unauthorized use of the photo 168.70.24.29 12:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FBIMG1714369737484.jpg

Perché hanno bloccato la mia pagina Don Annibale (talk) 12:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BOB Suprême (talk · contribs)

out of project scope, not notable

File:64b6383ad3b15680ce8a1cde BU1Y1EiQLyWKQ7jwq-cH-tmEkYu0lSLjm80MQAKnlBQ.png

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 13:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

? please explain BOB Suprême (talk) 12:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meria_(entreprise)&action=history this image is in a article, ok. but article take its real shape in just recent times. i doubt the article in french wiki notable. but,

Weak keep right now.

also, when i see this image, it was not in that article and i searched ""meria"" in google, there was no wikipedia link in results.

and file name itself is really a mess. and for scope policy, check this out: COM:SCOPE. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 14:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vakanada Putin - Wikipedia User.webp

This file was initially tagged by Modern primat as no permission (No permission since) - user has copyright violations, this may be another copyvio. but this image really look like AI created image. also but, user must indicate that it is AI image. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 13:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Буслаев Владислав Андреевич.jpg

Self-adv. Was. Not in use now. Bilderling (talk) 13:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ответ СебастьянХэдл.webp

Copyvio? The photo takes up a very small part of the overall image so possible DE MINIMIS Trade (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jhaad film (talk · contribs)

out of scope?

Trade (talk) 13:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i was gonna put these file in DR, you are faster than me buddy :D. @Trade

Delete all. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 13:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Снимок экрана 2023-11-04 в 09.03.26.png

It is a screenshot of a photo I uploaded here Microvipera (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JTulioPT (talk · contribs)

Above threshold of originality

Trade (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. File:Skyscraper Movie Logo.svg, File:Yesterday movie logo.svg, File:The Wild Robot logo.png and File:El Gourmet logo.svg which are unquestionably below the threshold of originality in their respective jurisdictions. I suspect some of the others may be too, as COM:TOO Andean Community is fairly high. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Team Mario banner.png

Violation of COM:FOP Japan. Unlikely to be COM:De minimis as it is the focus of the image. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PonceDeLeonTheLesser (talk · contribs)

Insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT. And not notable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shunichi Toki 20181212.jpg

This image has no right to be used by third parties. 113.149.174.2 04:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per https://archive.is/ZQ1PJ, https://imgur.com/a/KKKx4SS (HTML code cc-by license info) アーカイブのソースよりCCライセンスが付いていたことが確認できます。--こんせ (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

同サイトの他動画から同じく切り取られている菊池勇成(Takeru_Kikuchi_20181018.jpg)及び木島隆一(Ryuichi_Kijima_20180726/jpg)の画像は削除申請ののち削除されています。

よってこちらのShunichi Toki 20181212.jpgも同様に削除されるべきかと思います。

同条件であるのにこちらは削除するがこちらは削除しない、などと対応が違ってしまうのは筋が通りませんので。 113.149.174.2 14:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

追記

また、引用されているArchive.todayというツールが信用に足るものだという証拠はございますでしょうか？

ソースコードもそのスクリーンショットも、改ざんされたものではないと証明できますでしょうか。

たとえArchive.todayなるものが魚拓ツールとして有名だったとしても、有名であるだけ、です。

公的な機関でもなければYouTube公式又は公認でないサイト、ツールをソースとするのは納得できるものではありません。

現在事実としてあるのは「numan公式からアップロードされている該当の動画にはCCライセンスの表示がない」という事だけです。 113.149.174.2 15:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commentここでの審議は土岐隼一の画像ファイルを審議する場です、他の事例は関係ありません。Archive.todayが信用できるツールかどうか、スクリーンショットが信用できるか判定するのは管理者です。

Archive.todayが信用できないとなると沢山のファイルが削除されてしまいます。ストラトス43 (talk) 04:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

審議において過去の事例は重要な情報ですので、関係はあります。

ご自身で「他の事例は関係ない」としておきながら、何故他のファイルが削除される事を懸念しているのでしょうか。

なんにせよ、wikimedia commonsがArchive.todayという非公認ツールの情報を元にした審査をしていた事が問題なので、

他のファイルが削除されるのは当然と言えます。

「他のファイルも沢山削除されてしまうから」というのは全く理由になりえません。 113.149.174.2 10:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:井戸端/過去ログ17#コモンズへのアップロード後に再利用の許可が取り下げられた画像ファイルについてにおいて議論があった模様です。ストラトス43 (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

こちらの議論内にもありましたが、画像を存続したいと言うのであればやはりCCライセンスが適用されていたという確固たる証拠及び立証が必要かと思われます。

しかし非公認ツールであるArchive.todayを証拠とするのは問題であるという結論に至ります。

Archive.todayは過去に偽サイトが登録されていた事件やGoogleにおいてハックされていたという報告もあり、証拠として参照するには信用度の低いツールです。

信用度の高い証拠が無いのであれば画像の存続は認められるべきではないと考えます。 113.149.174.2 14:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - ここでおっしゃられた他のファイルはCommons:井戸端/過去ログ17#コモンズへのアップロード後に再利用の許可が取り下げられた画像ファイルについてに詳細がありますが、ライセンス査読が済んでいなかった削除されました。対してこのファイルはライセンス査読済みです。同条件ではありません。さらに、{{From youtube}}を御覧ください。YouTubeのアーカイブでArchive.todayが使われるのはコモンズでは一般的です。一般的である以上Archive.todayについてただの削除依頼で議論してもなにも得るものはありません。archive.todayを非推奨にしたいのであればCommons:Village pumpなどで行ってください。ここで議論しても何も変わりません。 Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

「Archive.todayが使用されることが一般的である事」と「それが正しい行いである事」は何も結びつきません。

一般的なものが正しいという決まりは無いからです。

今この画像を削除するかしないかの議論において重要なのはそれが一般的かどうかではなく、正しいか否かです。

ストラトス43様が「ここでの審議は土岐隼一の画像ファイルを審議する場です、他の事例は関係ありません。」と仰っていましたが、それに則ると「Archive.todayが使用されることが一般的である事」は「他の事例」にあたるため、この場では何の意味も成しません。

以前も申し上げましたが、現在事実としてあるのは「numan公式からアップロードされている該当の動画にはCCライセンスの表示がない」という事だけです。 113.149.174.2 15:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

私は確かに「ここは土岐隼一の画像を審議する場です、他の事例は関係ありません」と言いました。しかしその削除となったファイルにアーカイブのリンクがあったかどうか確認しようがありません。2つ前の返信の後に色々と検索をしていたら過去ログに議論があったのでそれを提示したまでです。今回の審議にその削除されたファイルを引き合いに出すのは公平とは言えないと思います。ストラトス43 (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

今回提示した過去ログにこの削除依頼の画像が含まれています。ストラトス43 (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license has been reviewed by trusted user. ライセンスレビュー済のため権利上の問題はありません. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shunichi Toki 20181212.jpg

CCライセンスが不適切に設定されたものである可能性がある盈散 (talk) 13:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023年2月の削除論議、記事「土岐隼一」の話題「画像の提示について」、また他記事・画像の同様の議論を読み、数年に渡って記事から画像の除去と差し戻しが繰り返されている現状を理解した上で、以下の3つの理由で画像の削除を提言いたします。

1. 画像が切り出された動画について、画像が最初にアップロードされた2018年12月29日時点ではCC-BY3.0ライセンスが設定されていたのかもしれませんが、2024年8月26日現在、当該動画にCCライセンスは付与されていません。

2018年当時のCCライセンスは誤って設定されたものではないでしょうか。CCライセンスが撤回できないことは把握しておりますが、動画からCCライセンスが除去された現状を鑑みて、以前のライセンスには権利的に問題があったと判断するのが妥当だと思います。

2. 2018年12月29日当時のYouTubeの利用規約4.Aに「お客様は、YouTubeの事前の書面による承認なく、本サービスまたは本コンテンツのいかなる部分」「をもいかなる媒体によっても配布しないことに合意します。」(https://www.youtube.com/t/terms?archive=20180525)とあります。したがって、YouTubeにアップロードされた動画から切り出し、ここにアップロードされた当該画像はYouTubeの利用規約違反になります。

動画と記事がnumanによるオリジナルコンテンツであることは明白ですが、それがYouTubeにアップロードされた動画から画像を再利用して良いという理由にはなりません。

3. 元動画はnumanのコンテンツとして撮影、公開されたものです。当該人物は、numanのコンテンツで利用されることは想定していたと思われますが、Wikipedia及びWikimedia Commonsで利用することには同意していないはずです。肖像権の侵害に当たる可能性があります。盈散 (talk) 13:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shunichi Toki 20181212.jpg

繰り返しの投稿すみません。
2023年2月の削除論議、記事「土岐隼一」の話題「画像の提示について」、また他記事・画像の同様の議論を読み、数年に渡って記事から画像の除去と差し戻しが繰り返されている現状を理解した上で、以下の3つの理由で画像の削除を提言いたします。
1. 画像が切り出された動画について、画像が最初にアップロードされた2018年12月29日時点ではCC-BY3.0ライセンスが設定されていたのかもしれませんが、2024年8月26日現在、当該動画にCCライセンスは付与されていません。
2018年当時のCCライセンスは誤って設定されたものではないでしょうか。CCライセンスが撤回できないことは把握しておりますが、動画からCCライセンスが除去された現状を鑑みて、以前のライセンスには権利的に問題があったと判断するのが妥当だと思います。
もし、正しいライセンスであることを権利者から確認を取った（あるいは、権利者からCCライセンスではない方法で画像利用の許諾を得ている）のでしたら、その旨を明記するべきです。
2. 2018年12月29日当時のYouTubeの利用規約4.Aに「お客様は、YouTubeの事前の書面による承認なく、本サービスまたは本コンテンツのいかなる部分」「をもいかなる媒体によっても配布しないことに合意します。」（https://www.youtube.com/t/terms?archive=20180525）とあります。したがって、YouTubeにアップロードされた動画から切り出し、ここにアップロードされた当該画像はYouTubeの利用規約違反になります。
動画と記事がnumanによるオリジナルコンテンツであることは明白ですが、それがYouTubeにアップロードされた動画から画像を再利用して良いという理由にはなりません。
3. 元動画はnumanのコンテンツとして撮影、公開されたものです。当該人物は、numanのコンテンツで利用されることは想定していたと思われますが、Wikipedia及びWikimedia Commonsで利用することには同意していないはずです。肖像権の侵害に当たる可能性があります。盈散 (talk) 13:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep当時の利用規約を依頼者が自分の都合の良いようのに解釈してるようにしか思えない。ストラトス43 (talk) 11:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

返信ありがとうございます。

YouTubeの利用規約について、多くのスクリーンショットが黙認されている現状は理解していますが、私個人の都合を持ち出したつもりはございません。たとえ黙認されているとしても、特にWikipediaのような誰でも簡単に閲覧できる場においては利用規約を遵守するべきではありませんか？

可能でしたら、CCライセンスと肖像権についても意見をいただければと思います。盈散 (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

前回の依頼も考慮していただくようお願いします。ストラトス43 (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ネットに公開されること前提で出演したんだし肖像権どうこうは外野である編集者は口出し出来る問題ではありません。CCライセンスについては前回の依頼でこんせさんがお話しした通りです。ストラトス43 (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

冒頭に記述した通り、23年2月の削除依頼に係る議論は読んでおります。

また、私は2018年当時、当該動画がCCライセンスだったかどうかを疑ってはおりません。

CCライセンスというものは、著作物の再利用を条件付きで可能にする意思表示を手軽に行うためのものです。YouTubeStudioではCCライセンスについて知識がなくとも簡単にライセンスを選択できるようになっています。私が懸念しているのは、2018年当時のCCライセンスには権利上の問題があった（ex: ライセンサーが権利者の意思を確認していなかった）という点です。クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ジャパンのFAQに「CCライセンスを付けてその作品を公開している人が、必ずしもその作品に関する全ての権利を有していることを保証するものではない」とあります。CCライセンスは撤回できませんが、現時点で動画からCCライセンスが取り消されていることは事実です。ライセンサーの意思を汲むべきだとは思いませんか。

https://creativecommons.jp/faq/#c5

繰り返しの主張にはなりますが、インターネットに公開された動画である以前にnumanが企画、撮影、配信を行ったコンテンツです。当該人物はnumanによって動画が利用されることには同意していると思われますが、Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commonsのような場で利用されることは想定していないはずです。

編集者は直接権利を侵害したり、権利者に代わって何かを承認したりはしませんが、Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commonsを編纂する一人のユーザーとして、他者の権利を尊重する必要があるはずです。権利的に問題があるコンテンツは削除するべきだと思いますが、いかがでしょうか。盈散 (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nazan Öncel Togay (talk · contribs)

we really dont know the person owns this account. we need VRT. i actually gonna mark it with "no permission", but i dont want to see them deleted in 7 days since these images are in use several pages. so, i request from the user, please contact VRT, so we understand that you are that person, thank you.

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 13:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see: COM:VRT modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 13:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AgorahillsCW (talk · contribs)

out of project scope.

File:Redeye Distribution logo.png <--- this is Keep, it is in scope, check: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Redeye_Distribution&action=history
File:WhyNot Media logo.png

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 13:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK Central City Hall lower block Exhibition Hall July 2021 SS2 07.jpg

copyrighted 2D works in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olade john (talk · contribs)

out of scope

Orizan (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Olade john (talk · contribs)

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope

Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vladimir wob (talk · contribs)

i believe these images are not free licensed.

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 14:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, these appear to be stills from the 1980 Russian film The Last Night of Scheherazade. Not clear why this would be public domain in the US.

More stills from the same film from the same uploader:

Belbury (talk) 16:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Josedavidvega7 (talk · contribs)

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope

Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by A Patfield (talk · contribs)

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope

Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Haqdeen (talk · contribs)

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope

Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marriage Proposal.jpg could be kept as an example of a marriage proposal in Sudan, if there's no copyright problem with the photo. Delete the rest as out of COM:SCOPE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Three paintings by living artist, not dead yet 70 years would require permission from COM:OTRS process for retention. User's other uploads have included outright copyvios of other living and recently deceased artists works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

No indication of user's own work on these two diagrams. Probable COM:COPYVIO. User's other uploads are all modern art.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Modern artworks by presumably living artist... is the artist notable, and if so, can COM:OTRS permissions be received? Commons is not a free hosting site for personal artworks.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Further uploads from this user with no COM:PERMISSION.

Belbury (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some files in anime television series logos extracted from PDF files

The following files contain the logo extracted from the PDF files:

The following files are also the same as above, but the revisions not based on the extracted logo may be kept:

According to the sources of these files, these are created by the extracted logo from the PDF file (television program timetable). I think the source PDF files meet the threshold of originality (i.e. not {{PD-textlogo}}). Also, I think these logos may be considered derivative works of the source PDF file. Therefore, these logos are not {{PD-textlogo}} and may not be accepted by Wikimedia Commons.--Momiji-Penguin (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Momiji-Penguin: Have you read COM:TOO Japan? Are all of these logos above that? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read COM:TOO Japan (I'm not sure if I understand correctly). Based on this, I think these logos are acceptable if the source is just the logo or the image which does not meet the threshold of originality. But in fact these logos are extracted from non-free PDF files. Article 20 (1) of the Japanese Copyright Act stipulated the Right to Integrity. Also, the Japanese Courts made this ruling a few years ago. This ruling concerned the automatic cropping of images, but I think extracting the logo from the PDF file is a similar issue (because the PDF file is cut). Therefore, I think that the Right to Integrity infringement may be recognized. Momiji-Penguin (talk) 16:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Momiji-Penguin: The logos already existed before the PDF files, and continue to exist afterwards. I think here on Commons we ignore the conglomeration as with {{PD-Art}}. You are welcome to seek clarification on COM:VPC. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per my reasoning above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yinka Williams (talk · contribs)

COM:WEBHOST. Non notable people, poor quality, out of scope. Also uncertain copyright.

Yann (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I am less certain about the copyright issues, but Prince B.B Apugo seems to be notable. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bivesge (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. One of these is in use on Wikidata, though there is a good chance that Wikidata entry should be deleted. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milky Way Across the Desert - Flickr - herberthaseneder.jpg

Scaled-down dupe of File:Milky Way viewed from Cerro Armazones, Chile (2019).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdul Wali Khan.jpg

1970s or 1980s photograph from Pakistan. I doubt Flickr user is the original photographer and since this appears to be created after 1973, it's not PD in Pakistan yet. Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its on Flickr, the person has put it under their own license. If you can find another variation of the image on web that is copyrighted and doesn’t derive from the author, then it will be deleted. You cannot delete an image on mere ‘doubt’. Titan2456 (talk) 18:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Right panel of Monterey Harbor terrazzo by Margaret Bruton.jpg

Derivative work which may be covered by FOP. Bruton died in 1992. Wiser heads than mine need to judge this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{PD-US-no notice}} and {{PD-CAGov}} (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monterey Harbor plaque and sculpture.jpg). IronGargoyle (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20220516Stolt Juleoel.jpg

This clearly shows a product label that includes imagery that seemingly exceeds the threshold of originality (fist bumping) EdoAug (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Note that the file has two derivative works: File:20220516Stolt_Juleoel_(cropped).jpg and File:20220516Stolt_Juleoel_(cropped)_(cropped).jpg. EdoAug (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mauxman (talk · contribs)

Possible copyvio: Picture from the official website http://www.luciomanca.com/, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elisabeth Hetherington.jpg

non free image from presskit of Hetherington see https://elisabethhetherington.com/biography/press-kit/ which reads: If you use these photos, please mention © Nathalie Hennis" Hoyanova (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelo da Silva PORGY BESS Photo by Lukas Ilgner.jpg

possible copyvio © Lukas Ilgner - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paulownia-in-Paris-PAULOWNIA-PIEMONTE-NAZIONALE-PAULOWNIA4PLANET-3-1152x1536.png

Heavily visually watermarked to https://www.paulownia4planet.com with a copyright notice in the top right, but no evidence of COM:PERMISSION. Belbury (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelo da Silva.jpg

possible copyvio © Tamás Künsztler Photography - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BoyHonorato (talk · contribs)

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Vista do riachinho.jpg is here, File:Mata da Bruxa.jpg has "© 2023 Google" watermark in upper right, etc.), all other user uploads are copyvios, etc.

Эlcobbola _talk 18:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konfigurace landru SLIM.jpg

that's not "own work", it comes directly from JAXA press kit, page 7, and JAXA images are not CC0 or PD. (also Japanese version) Artem.G (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JM L&P.svg

COM:SCOPE - unused logo of non-notable journal; see, for example, w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health Эlcobbola _talk 18:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unconvinced that its lack of notability in a Wikipedia sense should be sufficient by itself to delete this logo, but I predict that the closing admin will think it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RomainGary-JeanSebarg-Italie-1961.jpg

File:Romain Gary (cropped).jpg

Photo taken American photographer Sam Shaw (1912-1999), the same that took the iconic Marylin Monroe photos [1]. That the image was taken in Italy doesn't make Italy the country of origin. To assert it is in the public domain we need the first publication. Günther Frager (talk) 18:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The origin of the photographer working for an italian agency is not relevant. This photography has been taken in Italy, before 1976. The criteria are fully matching with PD-Italy. Tisourcier (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tisourcier: where did you get he worked for an Italian agency? The source is the "Shaw Family Archives", clearly not an Italian press agency. Moreover, the heirs of Sam Shaw registered several portraits of Romain Gary taken during the 1960s in the US copyright Office [2][3][4][5]. Günther Frager (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
During the 1960's, Sam Shaw worked for several european agencies or companies as such as for Carrese (Keystone Italy / Publifoto), Gamma Italy, Magnum Italy... Some eg :

https://www.germannauktionen.ch/en/items/14781-sam-shaw

https://www.germannauktionen.ch/de/items/16211-sam-shaw

Morevoer, Getty is known as often publishing copyfraud or wrong copyright credits. Eg, this photography wich has been taken by a French photographer for a French newspaper, and wich is PD-France :

https://www.gettyimages.fr/detail/photo-d%27actualit%C3%A9/meeting-of-the-dada-group-in-paris-louis-aragon-photo-dactualit%C3%A9/542359729
"Shaw Family archives" accounts for the archives collected by family but can't replace the authorship of agencies collective work in Italy. Again, the origin of the photographer is not relevant according to PD-Italy. Tisourcier (talk) 15:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't provide any evidence that this particular photo was made for an Italian press agency. A simple search shows that in 1961 alone he took photos in the US, France, Italy, Ireland, the UK, etc. On the same year he even was the producer and the cinematographer of the filem en:W:Paris Blues. Taking a picture in Italy doesn't make Italy the country of origin.

If the content of the links you provided are to be trusted, the photos were taken during the filming of the American Movie en:W:The Cardinal by the Autrian-American director Otto Preminger in 1963. The links also states that the copyright owner is "Gamma Productions Inc.". That is the company that produced the moviehttps://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/7449217] and has nothing to do with the French photo agency. And again it doesn't prove anything regarding the file under DR.

I also provided 4 links of copyright records of photos of Romain Gary taken by Sam Shaw between 1960 and 1962. If the US Copyright Office accepted these photos, then they are under copyright in the US. As the picture in this DR depicts Romain Gary and was taken by Sam Shaw during the same period, following COM:PCP we cannot keep it.

The first sentence of {{PD-Italy}} is quite clear The country of origin of this photograph is Italy.. The link goes to the Berne Convention definition: the member state where the work was first published. The rationale was discussed here: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/02#PD-Italy_wording. Moreover, the template also links Template:PD-Italy/US to verify when a photo created prior to 1976 is in the US public domain. It is clearly stated that the first publication in Italy is a must. Günther Frager (talk) 23:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mi trabajo.JPG

Photograph of text that is so poor quality that nothing can be read. Totally useless. Marbletan (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanislav-Sharp-Margita.jpg

No evidence of the free license. No verifiable source provided beyond Wiki. OTRS permission on srwiki added by user, who has never been OTRS agent. 92.243.182.19 18:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence for your nomination.

You need to access to Wikimedia system. In sr-wiki there is ticket. Please, start with that file and permition. And after, in the case of no permition, will come back to the file. SergioOren (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portada 4015.jpg

Needs to be cropped. The original uploader has already done so, but uploaded it with a different filename (File:Portada 4016.jpg). Therefore this inferior version should be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olga Gorpenko.jpg

License laundering. If somebody have access to a copy of a photograph, it doesn't mean this person becomes proper copyright holder. Moreover, "CC 4.0" is not enough to find out, is this acceptable for WM Commons or not. 92.243.182.19 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was provided by the author. Close life-time friend of a person. She made this photo. And she gave permition for the usage. SergioOren (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SergioOren then please ask the photographer to send a permission to COM:VRT. Nakonana (talk) 11:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Max Lemos.jpg

pt: Érico fez um levantamento do status de direitos autorais de imagens publicadas por governos e assembleias legislativas estaduais do Brasil, e imagens publicadas pela ALERJ (assembleia legislativa do Rio de Janeiro), como esta, não podem ser incluídas no Commons porque não são disponibilizadas sob uma licença livre. // en: Érico made a survey on the copyright status of images published by state governments and legislative assemblies of Brazil, and images published by ALERJ (Rio de Janeiro legislative assembly), like this one, cannot be included in Commons due to not being disponibilized under a free license. Solon ^26.125 12:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max Lemos.jpg

Source disappeared. Was deleted. No evidence that the license is valid. Yann (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It looks like all the key documents (source, license information link) are backed up on the Wayback Machine. Someone with a greater knowledge of the Portuguese language and/or Brazilian Government might be able to comment further, but I don't see any red flags which make me doubt the license here. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olga Firsova alpinist.jpg

No evidence provided, that the person who posted the image on FB is the proper copyright holder. Moreover, "CC 4.0" is not enough to find out, is this acceptable for WM Commons or not. 92.243.182.19 19:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken by the daughter of the person. And she was provided the permition for the usage. SergioOren (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1967BelvidereAerial.jpg

This file was initially tagged by GeorgeMemulous as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Black and white aerial photos of storm damage from T. Lebaron, Oak Park, IL (see credits section). Public domain / fair use status unknown. Yann (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image may be in the public domain, as that attribution only directly appears on the image for the Oak Lawn aerial photo, however its current status is unclear as the Belvidere image does not give any specific attribution. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeMemulous (talk • contribs) 01:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per precautionary principle. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 10:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait Bashkortostan.jpg

From Facebook - FBMD in metadata and low-res: probably not own work. 92.243.182.19 19:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work. SergioOren (talk) 21:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduvap logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep ("marketing" username); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victims of the 1993 events in Moscow 1.png

YouTube account owner is not the proper copyright holder for the photograph. Quick1984 (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a screenshot from the video uploaded by an official YouTube account. Should be kept. FlorianH76 (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eiga-Hyoron-1963-October-1.jpg

Film still of the French film À bout de souffle released in 1960. The director of photography was Raoul Coutard (1924-2016). This film still is one of the most iconic from the movie, and it was used for example as the poster in Italy [6]. This particular copy was taken from a Japanese magazine from 1963 (three years after the release of the film), and it is clearly not the first publication. We can undelete it in 2087 when it enters in the French public domain. Günther Frager (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ragavanka (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: miscellaneous plain text documents.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 20:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ragavanka (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: further miscellaneous plain text documents, some of them duplicates of ones previously deleted.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victims of the 1993 events in Moscow 2.png

YouTube account owner is not the proper copyright holder for these photographs. Quick1984 (talk) 19:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a screenshot from the video uploaded by an official YouTube account. Should be kept. FlorianH76 (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FlorianH76, do you understand, what the derivative work is? Do you understand, that your official YouTube account owner didn't make these photos? --Quick1984 (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a derivative work! It's a screenshot from the event in Moscow dedicated to the events in 1993. In this case it does not matter who is the owner of the photos. FlorianH76 (talk) 07:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- User:FlorianH76, it is very sad that you're actively nominating for deletion files uploaded by other users, demonstrating a blatant illiteracy in matters of copyright. Try to at least learn to distinguish the concepts of the owner and the author of photographs. --Quick1984 (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files from the Cementerio Sacramental de San Isidro de Madrid

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2024082310007864 regarding

All files in Category:San_Isidro_Cemetery,_Madrid

The Pontifica y Real Archicofradía Sacramental de San Pedro, San Andrés y San Isidro de Madrid, owner of this Cemmetery, is claiming the deletion of these files because they were uploaded without permission. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain#Freedom of panorama: «Under the 1996 Intellectual Property Law as amended up to 14 April 2018, Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public tracks and passes may be freely reproduced, distributed and communicated by painting, drawing, photography and audiovisual processes.» The cemmetery it's a private space, and even when it's open to public, doesn't qualify as “parks, streets, squares or other public tracks and passes”.

Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rosario Central teams

Photos published in Argentina between 1971 and 1989. They are currently in the public domain in its country of origin, Argentina (25 years after publication), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, the images are still copyrighted in the US.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nivín. Prehistoria de la localidad de Casma - Perú.webm

Doubt all the media used in this video is CCBY. The same may apply for the other videos uploaded. If possible provide the image source if they are CCBY and/or create a version without these images (or with CCBY ones) Prototyperspective (talk) 21:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rahul Jogi.jpg

This appears to be AI-generated I think? Is this a good image for a person? Also, can't these images be considered to violated copyrights of various artists? Batrachoseps (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1974 Xenia track map.jpg

This image is sourced from an interactiive mapping tool (Esri) embedded in an NWS web page.[7] There are a few separate issues here.

1. Most fundamentally, Esri projects geophysical data onto a basemap, visible in the image. In this case, elements of the basemap were provided by Garmin and by Here Maps (visible in the tool itself on the NWS website, but cropped out in our version). Coming from Garmin and Here, whatever elements each is providing to the basemap are presumably protected by copyright. The web tool actually lets you change the basemap, but exploring the various options there, I couldn't find any that didn't explicitly include proprietary elements.

2. Esri requires that images generated by their service display both the source of the basemap, and the "Powered by Esri" logo.[8] The NWS complies with this license in their presentation of the map, but our version of it crops out these required elements. Having to retain these elements doesn't seem fundamentally incompatible with a free license to me, but cropping them out is certainly not compliant. (And it's moot anyway because of the basemap issue).

3. Regardless of how differently we might interpret part of the NWS general disclaimer, this particular image is directly and unambiguously covered by the part that reads "Third-party information and imagery are used under license by the individual third-party provider. This third-party information may contain trade names, trademarks, service marks, logos, domain names, and other distinctive brand features to identify the source of the information. This does not imply an endorsement of the third-party data/products or their provider by NOAA/National Weather Service. Please contact the third-party provider for information on your rights to further use these data/products."[9]

This is a clear copyvio and we need to delete it.

Fortunately, there is a free alternative available. The NWS makes the calculated tornado track available in KMZ format which could be projected onto an open-source GIS viewer with only free elements. This would create a completely unencumbered image to use in place of this one. Rlandmann (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All issues have been fixed as this was (1) made by the U.S. government and (2) all Esri issues (#2) have been fixed. There is no further copyright issues regarding this image. The PD-NWS template has already been replaced by a PD-NOAA template as that is the more appropriate template, given this was made by an employee of the U.S. government as part of their official duties. WeatherWriter (talk) 22:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, are you claiming that the basemap visible in the image (which the NWS attributes to Garmin and Here Maps) was made by the US Government? --Rlandmann (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That isn’t relevant given it is hosted by Esri, meaning their copyright rules of their logo being present is all that matters. Why would Esri say “You can use this if our logo is present” and then have copyrighted work. That doesn’t logically make sense. The Esri issue was solved, meaning the only copyright issue was fixed. This is a map, free to use per Esri guidelines, made by the U.S. government utilizing Esri maps. The issue you would be describing goes against Esri rules, i.e. the entire point 2 issue would be moot and irrelevant, if Esri couldn’t give permission for it to be used in the first place. WeatherWriter (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In short, if this image is not allowed anymore, we need to have a copyright discussion for all Esri images, since this would, in short, argue Esri can’t actually let users use their maps in the first place over copyright issues. WeatherWriter (talk) 22:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not how copyright works; an individual image (or text/video/audio recording...) can contain multiple independent copyrightable elements. The overall image is only as free as its most encumbered element, so for the Commons, we need the image to be composed only of all-free elements. This one contains work of the NWS (the tornado track; free) plus Esri (logo; unfree, and removing it probably violates the license under which it was published) plus Garmin (some element/s of the basemap; presumably unfree) plus Home Maps (some element/s of the basemap; presumably unfree). The overall result is an unfree image. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then we need to take Esri to the copyright village pump. We cannot use anything made by Esri under the PRP since the base maps are copyrighted and Esri’s disclaimer (what you mentioned in point 2) doesn’t matter to begin with since Esri cannot allow people to use the maps as they do not own the whole map in the first place. NWS didn’t have permission to use this image is what I have found out from this. WeatherWriter (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I created a free alternative to this image in QGIS using the aforementioned NWS shapefile with background imagery from the USGS' High Resolution Orthoimagery catalog. HRO imagery of Greene County, Ohio (within the scope of this image) is in the public domain. —the•austin•man (works) 03:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you @TheAustinMan! This is a perfect replacement.

Because you seem far more familiar with these technologies than I am, I was wondering if you could comment on my analysis above, so I know if I'm on the right track with future license reviews? Am I right in thinking that the applet on the NWS page (and screen-shotted on the image being discussed in this DR) contains copyright-protected elements? (specifically, the basemap) --Rlandmann (talk) 09:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I am well-versed enough in copyright to pass judgement on Esri basemaps, so I'll leave that up to someone who's better read on the subject. Esri's satellite imagery basemap is attributed to Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community, and is licensed under the Esri Master License Agreement. It's worth noting that Esri explicitly states that generally, end users may not Use Living Atlas content for commercial use, but leaves room for users to negotiate commercial uses with Esri. I don't know the specific terms of the NWS' Esri license, though presumably it wouldn't be any different from licenses granted to the public given US government use of Esri is subject to FAR§12.212. When it comes to static maps that capture Esri content, the Esri terms of use states that government uses are permitted so long as the government agency clearly delineates between government works that are in the public domain and third party works that are protected by copyright. While the NWS general disclaimer in theory satisfies that, in practice the recent DRs cast doubt on whether that is actively being done. The Esri terms of use goes on to recommend accompanying such maps with the following attribution: Map image is the intellectual property of Esri and is used herein under license. Copyright © 2020 Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved. That doesn't seem to be an endorsement of characterizing such maps as free content. —the•austin•man (works) 17:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 18:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:January 7, 1992 F1 Tornado southeast of Worms, Nebraska.jpg

This image has been sourced from a 1992 issue of the NOAA publication Storm Data

Per the source, it is credited to Mrs. Elsie Houdek, Chapman, Nebraska. There is no claim that she was a US federal government employee, so as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, she owned the copyright in this image as soon as it was created.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and was published by the NOAA in a print publication to which the Sioux City office image submission guidelines do not appear to apply. Rlandmann (talk) 22:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 18:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:F4 damage from the November 29, 1991 Springfield F4 tornado.jpg

This image has been sourced from a 1991 issue of the NOAA publication Storm Data

Per the source, it is credited to Bob Linder of The News-Leader. As a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright in this image existed as soon as it was created, belonging either to Linder or The News-Leader, depending on their relationship.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and was published by the NOAA in a print publication to which the Sioux City office image submission guidelines do not appear to apply. Rlandmann (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per nomination. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 18:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:March 26, 1991 Abbyville F3 Tornado.jpg

This image has been sourced from a 1991 issue of the NOAA publication Storm Data

Per the source, it is credited to Mark Mills. There is no claim that he was acting as an employee of the US federal government, so as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright in this image existed as soon as it was created, belonging to him.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and was published by the NOAA in a print publication to which the Sioux City office image submission guidelines do not appear to apply. Rlandmann (talk) 23:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 18:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/26

August 26

Files uploaded by MrHerii (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by BorritotirroB (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Stores-Discount (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Chilatiao01 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Strindbergsmuseet

Files uploaded by Voiceofboi (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Anakarolyna.f (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by BOB Suprême (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Jhaad film (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by JTulioPT (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by PonceDeLeonTheLesser (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Nazan Öncel Togay (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by AgorahillsCW (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Olade john (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Olade john (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Vladimir wob (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Josedavidvega7 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by A Patfield (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Haqdeen (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Artist Mohsen Attya (talk · contribs)

Some files in anime television series logos extracted from PDF files

Files uploaded by Yinka Williams (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Bivesge (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Mauxman (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by BoyHonorato (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Ragavanka (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Ragavanka (talk · contribs)

Files from the Cementerio Sacramental de San Isidro de Madrid

Rosario Central teams

Navigation menu

Search