Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

August 27

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request: Image is an exact copy of a newly uploaded version that exists in a better format, this version is a duplicate and does not need to be kept. -North747 (talk) 21:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Author's request immediately after upload, exact dupe (not identical pixelmap, but exactly same motive) of File:Perfluorooctanoic acid in beaker.png. Taylor 49 (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). That tag seems very unclear here. Is it questioning the claim of own work? If not, the template is just plain wrong. If so, they ought to be explicit about why they question it. This file has been on Commons over a decade. That said, uploader has no other uploads, and this looks like a possible video screenshot. But "no permission since" probably should not be used on a picture uploaded more than 10 years ago. Jmabel ! talk 00:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author:not sure! 186.172.196.125 00:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cover photo needing VRT 186.172.196.125 00:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2012 photo, not 2023. 186.172.196.125 00:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:PSG FC logo.jpg, the threshold of originality is too low in France. Günther Frager (talk) 00:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This cover of American magazine published in 1950 contains an artwork by Spanish artists Joan Miró (1893-1983). The painting \ was first published in the French magazine en:W:Cahiers d'art in 1934 [1]. The country of origin is therefore France where it is still copyrighted (70 years pma). We can undelete it in 2054. Günther Frager (talk) 01:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Artwork by Spanish artist Joan Miró (1893-1983) created in 1937 for the Exposition Internationale des Arts et Techniques dans la Vie Moderne in Paris (see es:W:Aidez l'Espagne). Thus it is currently copyrighted in its country of origin (70 years pma). We can undelete it in 2054. Günther Frager (talk) 01:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Artwork by Spanish painter Joan Miró (1893-1983), still copyright in France (he moved there in 1920). We can undelete in 2054. Günther Frager (talk) 01:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Sculpture by Joan Miró (1893-1983) installed in 1975 in Milano where there is no freedom of panorama. We can undelete it in 2071 when it enters in the US public domain. Günther Frager (talk) 01:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyrighted books with wrong filenames

01:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photos where uploaded by Jordanrandallsmith (talk · contribs) and are clearly not selfies. To keep them we need a VRT ticket with an explicit permission from the copyright holders.

Günther Frager (talk) 01:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused, low-quality software screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 02:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Emblem_of_West_Bengal, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of the Government of West Bengal.svg, and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-10#File:Emblem_of_West_Bengal.svg. Günther Frager (talk) 02:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received permission from SF librarian. But I have noticed that another file from is being deleted (File:Esther Bruton and Victor Arnautoff (1936).jpg) with similar case. Puncinus (talk) 02:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can contact COM:VRT to get help on what permission you need. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received permission from SF librarian for this. But this may not be sufficient. Puncinus (talk) 02:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received permission from SF librarian for this. But this may not be sufficient. Puncinus (talk) 02:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received permission from SF librarian for this. But this may not be sufficient. Puncinus (talk) 02:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received permission from SF librarian for this. But this may not be sufficient. Puncinus (talk) 02:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question Why insufficient foe permission? --A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It is a WPA image by a government employee, we have over 1,000 uploaded from the Library of Congress. The LOC has not digitized all of them yet, they have been very slow in either scanning or uploading them to the LOC website of their Flickr Commons account. Other libraries/archives have copies in their collection and scan and upload faster. --RAN (talk) 01:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I made this picture myself, there is art by K. Bednarski here which may be copyrighted (solder and pink partner). Puncinus (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it is not a picture, so perhaps it is copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify why you think the applied license doesn't hold. That license tag says nothing about the kind of work that is (or rather is not) under copyright. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it is not a picture so perhaps it is copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this not a picture? PaterMcFly (talk) 07:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it is not a picture, so perhaps it is copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 02:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? That is obviously a picture. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs. Text and logos present in photograph. Clovermoss (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t really think it’s notable enough for copyright protection but I don’t care if it’s deleted. Was a part of a flickr2commons transfer. If not in use on any articles I suppose it’s not that important. PascalHD (talk) 05:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PascalHD: Could you clarify what you mean by notable enough for copyright protection? I'm new to Commons and trying to learn but this seemed like a pretty clear cut case to me after reading the page I linked above. I'm open to the idea that I am wrong if it is explained to me how I am. Clovermoss (talk) 10:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Clovermoss "Notable enough for copyright protection" means that a work must have enough originality and creativity to be protected by copyright. Simple or common phrases, facts, or ideas that don't show a unique, creative expression typically aren't considered notable enough for copyright protection.
In my personal opinion, the sign lacks enough creativity necessary to qualify for copyright protection. Others will disagree with me but this is just some basic text slapped on a pink sign with some simple emblems and logos (which would be trademarked and/or COM:DeMinimis). This sign is not the same as an excerpt from a book for example, which would be creative enough, in my view. PascalHD (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a pretty lengthy text though (literally a few paragraphs) and the link says As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs [...] are almost always copyright protected. I wouldn't say anything in the sign is a common expression, it all seems fairly unique and creative to me (the hashtags, the details of the promise, etc). Clovermoss (talk) 22:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The text required "exercise of skill and judgment" to write, in my opinion. (COM:TOO Canada). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Mdaniels; see also COM:FOP Canada. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

image of album cover, used only in promotional page deleted off enwiki for being copyvio => very very likely copyvio also DS (talk) 02:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as this is a photo of an American music producer, we can reasonably infer that the photo was taken in the US, in front of a mural. The US has no freedom of panorama for murals. We could, in principle, crop everything out of the photo except the person, but I remain to be convinced that the photo is within project scope. DS (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a screenshot of a YouTube video, it is possible that the video content is copyrighted. Astrinko (talk) 04:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file is a screenshot of a YouTube video, it is possible that the video content is copyrighted. Astrinko (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution image without metadata. Unlikely to be uploader's own work. 2405:201:D002:319D:89BD:B5E5:9C72:A4D8 05:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot uploaded for spam at Kowiki, also not sure these image's copyright *Youngjin (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS. 0x0a (talk) 07:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a toy, its a photo from the Fraggle exhibit at the Center for Puppetry of Arts in Atlanta Georgia. July 2024. IntrepidReason (talk) 07:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Read the details from that link. 0x0a (talk) 07:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IntrepidReason (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art in the U.S. (see COM:FOP US for details).

0x0a (talk) 07:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WBAUT31080A884933 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

problematic user. File:Flow forming wheel production.jpg is not own work. I suspect that Estonian diagram (File:Veljediagramm.png) is from some technology magazine. Deletion per COM:PCP

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Paul Michels, who died in 1970. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2041.

Rosenzweig τ 07:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Feraspen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope promo images. Used in declined draft only

George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was part of a street art installation, with all the artworks displayed in public spaces. ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but such kinds of artwork is categorized as "graphic works", which is not covered by Bangladeshi FOP (similar to the British FOP as Bangladesh is a former colony of UK). --A1Cafel (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no author given no permission - taken from https://rickyrisolles.nl/ Hoyanova (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoyanova, is there a reason why we shouldn't use this photo? This is our own picture as I am part of Ricky Risolles and content owner of rickyrisolles.nl. Or should I change credits somewhere? Thank you Martijn1977 (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Martijn1977, if there's any issue, try corresponding with COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio; artworks 1965/1971; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 08:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a problem with the windows, as these are normal, cheaply manufactured industrial windows that were not designed by an artist. There are therefore no works of art on the windows, just a colourful variety that should allow a beautiful incidence of light. I took the pictures myself in recent years when I played the organ in Aufenau. FauleBirne 007 (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Were the compositions that used the glass not sketched by an artist prior to the installation of the glass? Surely, someone selected the shapes, as they are not random. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant Huangguoshu Waterfall photos by Huangdan2060

[edit]

Almost identical with File:Huangguoshu Waterfall in October 2020, Picture001.jpg.

Almost identical with File:Huangguoshu Waterfall in October 2020, Picture008.jpg.

Almost identical with File:Huangguoshu Waterfall in October 2020, Picture013.jpg.

Almost identical with File:Huangguoshu Waterfall in October 2020, Picture019.jpg.

Almost identical with File:Huangguoshu Waterfall in October 2020, Picture058.jpg. --Jonashtand (talk) 08:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kod B taken on 2022-11-06

These files were allegedly all taken on 6 November 2022. This is highly improbable as one picture is taken in Japan, another one in Turkey, and a third one in Madagascar. Authorship and license information are therefore suspicious. No Exif data either. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing the source, concerned it could be copyright violation Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derrivated from the Russian postal card which is PD. The whole postcard with stamps is free from copyright, but the painting is not. For example see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oleg Dahl Postal card Russia 2016cr.jpg FlorianH76 (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FlorianH76, the most complete list of cropped postal covers you can find at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (cropped postal covers) (dozens of them are still present). Quick1984 (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence)

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other works by Saype are on Commons. Where is the difference? MHM (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama clearly says "Works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures or chalk paintings on streets, are nevertheless considered permanent." PaterMcFly (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence) Martin Sg. (talk) 10:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Martin, I will just question who you believe the copyright belongs to, which I think should form a major part of this discussion. If the copyright belongs to Saype, then permission should be sought from him to allow the image to be shown? If the copyright belongs to Air Production, who made the video, they have already agreed to publish under CC-BY-3.0 Unported license. If the image belongs to the local governing administration of Estavayer-le-Lac Suisse, or to the Swiss government, or the people of Switzerland, then I guess you will be correct. But we need to establish whom. Thank you. James Kevin McMahon (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC) KEEP[reply]
Hi James Kevin. The holder of copyright, imho, is the creator of the depicted artwork, i.e. Saype. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Mart Sg. I thought that rule only applies in France, not in Switzerland. See Freedom of panorama, it does not seem to apply to Switzerland.James Kevin McMahon (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama clearly says "Works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures or chalk paintings on streets, are nevertheless considered permanent." PaterMcFly (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence)

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich halte deine Argumentation nicht für stichhaltig. Das Grasgemälde wird/wurde nicht entfernt. Es bleibt an Ort und Stelle. Es ist allein die Natur, welche das Gemälde zum Verschwinden bringt. Auch schnell zerfallende Werke können im Sinne des Gesetzes «permanent» sein und fallen folglich unter die Panoramafreiheit. Eis-, Sand-, Schneeskulpturen und Strassenmalerei halten selten mehr als einige Tage oder Wochen. Wenn sie während ihrer natürlichen Haltbarkeit an einem öffentlichen Ort bleiben, werden sie als «permanent» angesehen und fallen unter die Panoramafreiheit. Die zur Diskussion stehenden Bilder mit dem Titel Bridges? sind öffentlich zugänglich und von öffentlichen Standpunkten (vor allem von der Poyabrücke File:SAYPE_Bridges_2024_Fribourg_01.jpg) aus aufgenommen. Die übrigen Fotos von Bridges? zeigen die Grasmalerei ausserdem nicht in einer wirksamen Perspektive. Das Kunstwerk kann auch als Beiwerk zur Aufnahme der Poyabrücke bzw. der Landschaft gesehen werden. Diese Gründe sprechen gegen einen Löschantrag. -- Matutinho 18:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Ich stimme Matutinho zu, diese Werke werden durch natürliche Ursachen vergehen, nicht durch eine geplante Zeit, nach der sie entfernt werden. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama clearly says "Works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures or chalk paintings on streets, are nevertheless considered permanent." PaterMcFly (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why does it have structured data "Friday Night Funkin'"? Is it CCBY? Prototyperspective (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to the other uploads by the user. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Marvel Comics artwork Redjedi23 (talk) 10:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DuongNhanAC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The name is inappropriate since Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) is located in Selangor. Most of the photographs in the category focuses in KLIA only. I will create this category again if I got the chance to travel around the city of Kuala Lumpur in the future. Thanks! Ralffralff (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by GermanAR360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshot of a news broadcast, not own work

Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My old work, when I did not know the rules of Wikimedia Commons. Deriative work of protected by copyright aircraft livery (File:Tupolev Tu-134A-3, Chuvashiya Airlines AN0739072.jpg). Горизонт событий (talk) 11:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tilman Woertz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All credited to University Tubingen in exif, needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ahmadghader (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Credited to Paul Saad social media, needs VRT

Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Heatherhortonart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art, artist is alive, needs permission to keep

Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it's still protected by copyright. There is no freedom pf panorama for building interiors in Germany

Lukas Beck (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a reason for deletion, CC licenses are irrevocable. The same goes for the other DRs in this manner. --Rosenzweig τ 06:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Je demande la suppression de mes photos. Ceci est mon droit en tant qu'auteur, quelles qu'en soient les raisons. Jeremy.toma (talk) 19:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The contract you agreed to when you uploaded the photo in 2021 doesn't allow you to demand the file's removal. It's terrible that people are using the photo without giving you credit. You can sue them, but you can't revoke the license you agreed to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are some harsh swear words for dictators in English language, with no educational value whatsoever. Astrinko (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Assholes', as defined by Meriam Webster, see: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assholes is in fact not a swear word, but a commonly used English term.
In contrast, the attempt at affecting the removal of this original work by me, which is a form of free speech, is in itself an exercise in trying to establish a form of dictatorship.
Dear Astrino: Greetings from George Orwell and the thought police. Germaniac2 (talk) 15:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, until piracy can be proven (there is a "(C)" inside). 16:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
That's a derivate work of the logo of the German right-populist party "Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)" (lit. Alternative for Germany), see Category:Logos of Alternative für Deutschland. The AfD logos don't come with a © sign and not sure that someone else can claim copyright for the party's logo. The real question however is whether this file is in scope, because it appears to be a work of personal art / someone's creative way of expressing their disliking of the AfD. I googled the slogan of this file (assholes for dictatorship) but couldn't find any source that mentions it. So, it's an unofficial personal opinion piece. Is that in scope? Nakonana (talk) 01:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This is a screenshot from news footage protected by copyright. The original video can be found here and this screenshot is from around the 0:24 mark.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 11:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]



 Delete per precautionary principle. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 11:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are some harsh swear words for dictators in English language, no educational value cross-wiki Astrinko (talk) 11:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Assholes', as defined by Meriam Webster, see: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assholes is in fact not a swear word, but a commonly used English term. In contrast, the attempt at affecting the removal of this original work by me, which is a form of free speech, is in itself an exercise in trying to establish a form of dictatorship. Dear Astrino: Greetings from George Orwell and the thought police.

These are some harsh swear words for dictators in Germany language, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Astrinko, who requested deletion of this file stated: "These are some harsh swear words for dictators in Germany language, no educational value cross-wiki." "Germany language" really? Is this a bot or just a run of the mill fascist or fascist-sympathizer? 'Arschlöcher', as defined in the Duden, see: https://www.duden.de is in fact not a swear word, but a very commonly used German term. In contrast, the attempt at affecting the removal of this original work by me, which is a form of free speech, is in itself an exercise in trying to establish a form of dictatorship. Dear Astrino: Greetings from George Orwell and the thought police. Germaniac2 (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Commons ist allerdings nicht Social Media. Der Sinn dieser Webseite besteht nicht darin, eine Plattform für Meinungsäußerung oder Redensfreiheit zu bieten. Astrinko's Begründung reicht vermutlich nicht aus für eine Löschung, weil hier nicht zensiert wird. Allerdings könnte die Datei trotzdem gelöscht werden, weil sie womöglich keinen pädagogischen Wert hat und somit COM:Scope nicht erfüllt. Nakonana (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Germaniac2 und es empfiehlt sich auch, Unterstellungen à la "Faschist" zu vermeiden, da das als persönlicher Angriff gesehen werden kann und damit gegen die Regeln verstößt. Es gibt hier einfach Leute, die neue Uploads durchgehen und prüfen, ob die Uploads den Regeln und Kriterien von Commons entsprechen. Wenn die Leute meinen, dass es bei einer Datei ein entsprechendes Problem gibt, nominieren sie diese zur Löschung. Nakonana (talk) 02:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Christos.papavassiliou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only uploads of this user, different cameras and one is available here - https://www.eng.ed.ac.uk/about/events/20240307-1800/milne-lecture-inaugural-lecture-professor-themis-prodromakis-regius-chair and here from 2022. Needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a TV series can't be personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dsaan212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded for website; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused selfie, out of the project scope (en:User_talk:Isaactim2000#October_2022) Nutshinou Talk! 12:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused content related to non-notable social media, no clear educational value, out of scope (fr:Utilisateur:Wyyldeofficiel/Brouillon) Nutshinou Talk! 12:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unlikely that this magazine cover is the uploader's own work; even if it is, it is highly unlikely they are able to licence it this way 81.2.123.64 12:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your fast consideration. This cover belongs to this account as I am representative of the magazine. We are allowed to share the cover in the creative commons. MaailmanKuvalehti (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Com:Penis and must have been shared in some strange social medium, per Exif. 186.172.107.161 12:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


PenisBot in action?! 186.172.107.161 13:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete cock-only account. Taylor 49 (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused nondescript photo of unidentified street. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely a street near a beach in Brazil, from the source video. Probably not useful on its own though. Abzeronow (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope . Astrinko (talk) 13:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and derivate work of copyrighted work (unless Pokémon is under CC these days). Nakonana (talk) 02:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


As the history of the file shows it, this is a screenshot of File:Laminage schema gene.svg Borvan53 (talk) 13:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, dupe of File:Laminage schema gene.svg (request rename of the latter if desired), delete File:Capture d’écran 2016-01-10 à 15.47.19.png too. Taylor 49 (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim. Based on the crest on the tracksuit, this professional portrait is likely a work created and copyrighted by the Daejeon Hana Citizen football team. plicit 13:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative works of copyrighted content, using copyrighted characters from the animation "One Piece" (Japan) + such content is out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unused personal selfie of non-contributor, out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 13:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal selfie of non-contributor, out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 13:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not my own work, the character images come from LEGO. Astrinko (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Awrytykes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickrwashing, all four images are from a Flickr account that has uploaded only these four images, a week prior to the Commons upload. File:Rainer Becker 2024.jpg is a crop of a photo at https://thechillreport.com/2024/02/23/zuma-muenchen-2024-pop-up/ which is copyrighted to an agency, File:Roka restaurant.jpg has been used at a higher resolution in press coverage (https://gq-images.condecdn.net/image/zxo5Ndv11zM/crop/1000).

Belbury (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These files were all nominated for deletion individually by Kigsz. The rationale was the same for each file: This seems like a copyrighted logotype. Kigsz (talk) 07:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC). I think it ought be better if they all appear in a mass request since they are so similar.[reply]

Jonteemil (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Napster, not really being copyright protection advocates, would unlikely copyright their logo. We do need proof of a free license however, otherwise we have to consider the files as copyvios, eventhough I doubt that they are. Jonteemil (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That is not a valid reason for deletion. Commons licenses are not rewokable. If your images are used contrary to the license terms of a CC-BY license, you can sue, but that does not affect the legitimate uses. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
En tant qu'auteur de cette photo, je souhaite la supprimer. Si vous m'en empêchez, je serai contraint d'engager des poursuites contre Wikipédia Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this user needs to be blocked for threats. I will report you to COM:ANU. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis désolé mais une license libre, une fois déclarée, n'est pas révocable. Gnom (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, out of scope (non-personal similar views available, such as File:Consucep.jpg). P 1 9 9   14:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused (corporate?) logo Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The work is a derivative of a government work. Permission is also required for the original work. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The work is a derivative of a government work. Permission is also required for the original work. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The work is a derivative of a government work. Permission is also required for the original work. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The date "presumably before 1963" is inaccurate. He became an MP in 1971, became a deputy PM in 1973, and later PM in 1976. This appears to be an official portrait after entering politics. Since COM:Malaysia required photo to be published before 1962, otherwise they are copyrighted in both USA and Malaysia, this photo is possibly copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, I hope it can be deleted quickly. Baginda 480 (talk) 03:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seven days have passed, it's time to delete it! Baginda 480 (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User clams a copyrighted image as own work. The image is in fact a screenshot from a recent YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTuXsYBIXHE&t=61Marvin talk 16:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment edit warring. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I should have mentioned that. The image is being used in what can be called edit warring. However I believe the copyright issue can be assessed separately from the article's issue. — Marvin talk 17:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I referred the article edit war to the Biographies of living persons Noticeboard on Wikipedia, I hope that will help resolve it. I still think it has no bearing on the copyright issue. — Marvin talk 18:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also think the description should be removed if BLP applies to Commons as it basically states Janek is a homosexual, a claim not made in his Wikipedia article. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة ليست لها أهمية Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not a 2024 photograph Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SDSS is not an agency under NASA, so this image should be copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lenten veils

[edit]

I am afraid but the artworks depicted in these photos are protected by copyright, and freedom of panorama does not apply to them (for Austria, see COM:FOP Austria), which is why we have to delete the photos unless we receive a permission from the artists. --Gnom (talk) 16:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Consent to deletion. The Lenten veils are not permanently at this location (one of the ones pictured has been on display in our rectory for over 10 years, so their life-span is much years longer than they are displayed in the churches). Therefore, the conditions for freedom of panorama are not met. In addition, for the photos from Germany: there, freedom of panorama does not apply inside buildings. None of the Lenten veils have been permission by the respective artist. Quedel (talk) 16:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Quedel: The half of these photos are made in Austria not in Germany ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 18:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Said nothing others? Quedel (talk) 19:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is the owner of the poster, but has no copyright to upload it under a CC license --> copyvio. Paulae (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fictional election proportion diagram, out of scope. Also added:

-- P 1 9 9   17:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. Also added:

-- P 1 9 9   17:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission from artist Trade (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a young girl in a forest. Omphalographer (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my name banumoorthy why to delete 2409:408D:71D:9CC:E77B:F16:C7B7:D7ED 17:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Redundant to File:Château de Lousteau, Gamarde-les-Bains, Landes, France.jpg. P 1 9 9   17:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of two children eating. Omphalographer (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

status of Hirata, Yukie in Kaizu, Gifu

[edit]

COM:FOP Japan the contributor says that the statues was established in 1995.

eien20 (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alexclausewitz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - non-notable person; tr:Berk Canpas already deleted due to same. Also likely COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, File:Berk Canpas in New York City, 2023.png previously here, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As described well by Mandarax on the English Wikipedia, "The artist is still alive, and the painting is from 2010. Clicking on the image in its source page, it says "Artwork copyright the artist, who must grant permission to use or create photographs or derivative works for any other use than personal." SL93 (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see this disclaimer. I agree with the deletion in this case. AnotherColonialHistorian (talk) 02:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Label art is complex enough to be copyrighted: COM:PACKAGING Dreamyshade (talk) 18:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Label art is complex enough to be copyrighted: COM:PACKAGING Dreamyshade (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Label art is complex enough to be copyrighted: COM:PACKAGING Dreamyshade (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Label art is complex enough to be copyrighted: COM:PACKAGING Dreamyshade (talk) 18:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Label art is complex enough to be copyrighted: COM:PACKAGING Dreamyshade (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was overtaken by a better one PancoPinco (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of Claudio Pistilli's upload (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:2-oxazolidinone.png), not used. Wostr (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The metadata give Copyright Giselle Haber Photography. Is the user the same person? Wouter (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was overtaken by a better one PancoPinco (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without knowing the publication history of this historic photograph, we cannot say it is an anonymous work. Missing US license, but it could be PD by formalties if it was an RKO promotional photograph or a postcard photo. Abzeronow (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be deleted, I've got the agreement unofficially but I'm waiting for the official confirmation Alaexis (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've initiated a regular deletion request in order to avoid speedy deletion. Alaexis (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pobrecitos! De repente unos adolescentes palestinos pueden tirarles piedras y ellos pueden quedar obligados a matarlos con las armas que andan llevando. No tengo problemas con judios comunes, pero hoy en dia los palestinos son como judios bajo Nazis en su propio pais... 186.175.242.15 20:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be deleted, I've got the agreement unofficially but I'm waiting for the official confirmation. I'm initiating a regular deletion request in order to avoid speedy deletion. Alaexis (talk) 19:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Structure with missing N-methyl group, over two years ago uploader has been notified about this issue, but it wasn't resolved. This problem occurs also in:

by the same author. Wostr (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😳. Marbletan (talk) 12:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be taken from https://store.didigallery.com/en/catalog/authors/braulov-sasha Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SELI-chan42 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: thumbnail images with visual characteristics that suggest screengrab.

P 1 9 9   19:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cfmsr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentified location (clearly not Tokyo based on the mix of Chinese and English writing), and Flickr description credits Reddit, so no evidence that the license is correct. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Chinatown in Tokyo? There are almost a million Chinese in Japan since the Empire. We need someone to identify the license plate number on the minibus. Perhaps it is Hong Kong or Taiwan. Alexander One Rule (talk) 19:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexander One Rule There’s no Chinatown in Tokyo, and even in a Chinatown in Yokohama or Kobe, the traffic signs wouldn’t be a combination of English/Chinese. I’m guessing Hong Kong or Singapore based on the British English signage.
The more important issue is the license though. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finding it rather dubious to claim it as own work . A completely out-of-context image of a new kind of shopping cart, very similar to an image here, uploaded by a user who's only edits were to spam content related to this cart at an.wp, where I have taken the image out of use. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text doc, hardly legible, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Edalexanderjr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{No permission since|month=August|day=27|year=2024}}

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JeeP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused math equations, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr description says Slides from the CE Family Collection via a generous Redditor, no evidence that the license is correct, no author information given Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an indication of the license type for Flickr. This license is clearly shown and there is nothing to suggest otherwise. Perhaps the photo was received as a gift with all rights to it. The nomination for removal comes from speculation rather than from an actual designated license. Alexander One Rule (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images, visual characteristics suggest screengrab.

P 1 9 9   19:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Album cover, likely copyvio. Only used on user page of non-contributing user. Also added:

-- P 1 9 9   19:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused montage of non-notable event, out of scope. And no credit/source of individual images. P 1 9 9   19:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on user page of non-contributing user. Also added:

-- P 1 9 9   19:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blurred image of part of some animal. Too little context to be educational. Nv8200p (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. And not notable. P 1 9 9   20:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work. P 1 9 9   20:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake flag. No evidence in reputable sources that this flag was oficially used by ushkuiniks. Горизонт событий (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake flag. No evidence in reputable sources that this flag was oficially used in Sagallo. According to this source, Russian coloniststs used regular Russian flag Горизонт событий (talk) 20:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable group, no educational value, out of scope. And not own work: credit in watermark not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9   20:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by OTICPROFORMA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional corporate images, COM:WEBHOST and advertising, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Robpetriealkmaar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagrams without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/File:File:Julian20240827.jpg[reply]

unused "u-boat" JPEG 2000 version of Map of Summit Co., Ohio LOC 2012592394.tif as a PDF metafile, no need for this Ras67 (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Carl Ahrens, who died in 1956. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2027.

Rosenzweig τ 20:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the photo violates architect's copyright. Architect et:Herbert Johanson died in 1964 and the photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2035 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 21:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be a free pciture. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copied from https://www.gcco.dz/dt_gallery/centre-de-conventions-doran/ and not own work. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Low quality diagram, not used, two alternatives in Category:tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate. Wostr (talk) 22:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality diagram that implies covalent bonds between lead and oxygens, we have File:PbAc4.png that is better. Wostr (talk) 23:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is an exact copy of a newly uploaded version which has better format and is cropped North747 (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is an exact copy of a newer version I have uploaded that is in better quality and cropped. North747 (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having a second look, based on DMacks' comment, I must have gotten them mixed up. The jpg version does appear to have more fine detail than the png. (Someone must have yoinked my eye. 😉) Marbletan (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 :) DMacks (talk) 04:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep pending clarification. User:North747, I don't see a cropping difference, but instead the nominated file is higher resolution and appears more in-focus at typical display sizes. Could you clarify the better-quality aspects you are intending? DMacks (talk) 06:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is an exact copy of a newly uploaded version that is cropped better. This file is not in use anywhere. North747 (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably either in copy right or only CC-NC which we can't use? Jengod (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably still in copyright or released only under CC-NC which we can't use Jengod (talk) 23:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is in the PD only in its country of origin (Argentina) but not in the US at the URAA date (1996). Fma12 (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Whastalk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely above COM:TOO. Not licensed freely. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 01:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep - this looks very simple to me. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. I think the arrangement of text, colors, icons, and dialog boxes push it past TOO. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 02:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per above, and I realize "they won't sue" isn't a usable argument on Commons, but this is a scammer's dialog box, so you think a scammer will sue someone for violating their copyright, all the more so when they presumably stole this from someone else, anyway? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]