Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/27

26 July 2024

28 July 2024

Deletion requests on 27 July 2024

July 27

Files in Category:Aba Nigeria Temple

Images (dating from 2008) claimed to be freely usable. However, {{Grandfathered old file}} does not apply to images uploaded in 2008. A valid permission through COM:VRTS correspondence is needed, instead of blanket statement "Elder and Sister Badger and the Cameroon members took pictures with shared camera for 'everyone to freely use however they want'."

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I received this email from a participant that they were given the pictures by the owner to use however they wanted. Ben forwarded the pics to me for uploading.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Aba Temple photos

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:34:11 -0600

From: Julie [hidden] <julie@[hidden].com>

To: Ben [hidden]<ben@[hidden].com>

Hi Ben: I found the photo you asked for. I have good news and bad

news. The good news is its one of the Badger's photos, and they gave us

permission to use them any way we wanted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trödel (talk • contribs) 05:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC+8)

@Trödel: can you forward this correspondence to COM:VRTS volunteers? Thru: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The file was uploaded in 2008, and cannot be grandfathered. Only files that were uploaded before 2007 can be eligible for grandfathering. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Editor-desatento.png

I don't think Joaquin took this photo if he is in the photo. Not own work. Heylenny (talk) 08:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Drphungmanhcuong (talk · contribs)

Images that are uploaded to promote a service. Out of scope.

0x0a (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheetul.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BotanyBay.jpg

possible copyvio © Stephan Kleinert - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Photo is indeed by Stephan Kleinert, it was published under CC-BY-SA, with his website stated as the author. The website where it was originally posted with license details is unfortunately no longer online. --Waithamai (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pia Latina.jpg

Zweifelsfrei Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Bild soll die Hochladerin und Urheberin zeigen, es handelt sich aber zweifelsfrei nicht um ein Selfie

Undoubtedly mislicensing as “own work” - image is supposed to show the uploader and author, but it is undoubtedly not a selfie Lutheraner (talk) 12:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obvious copyvio, imo a case for a speedy delete. Also out of scope: person is non-notorious, according to deletion of her German Wikipedia article. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Datopaduka (talk · contribs)

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 12:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

--0x0a (talk) 15:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Datopaduka (talk · contribs)

looking like screenshot, probably not own work images.

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 18:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Central Hawke's Bay District coat of arms.svg

I suspect that this image is a copyright violation of the logo/crest of the w:Central Hawke's Bay District Council as seen here. While it is in the form of a coat of arms, the uploader has not indicated if it is based on a blazon and thus free from copyright per template:coa blazon. It's always possible that this logo doesn't actually have a blazon and is intead just designed to look like a coat of arms. As such, unless the uploader can provide a source for the blazon, I suspect this is instead based on the image of the logo itself. Radicuil (talk) 12:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmerston North CoA.png

I am the uploader of this image. I now understand that it is probably a copyright violation as it doesn't comply with template:coa blazon and was based on the image of the Palmerston North coat of arms as seen here and here. While I do beleve there is a blazon for this coat of arms based on at least this, I haven't been able to actually view this or find another source for the blazon. Radicuil (talk) 12:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:第64回京成杯 (2021年1月14日).jpg

File:ヤマニンウルス(プロキオンS制覇時).jpg

Files in Category:C'era una volta il West

Screenshots and still frames from the Italian movie C'era una volta il West in 1968. It is correct that these images are in the public domain in Italy (still frames are protected only for 20 years), but the usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect. The movie was also published in the US and it was registered under the record LF34, see the Catalog of Copyright Entries, Cumulative Series 1960-1960, published in 1971 [1].

Günther Frager (talk) 14:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If these are not pd in the US, too bad.--Judithcomm (talk) 18:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo (film)

Screenshots or still frames from the Italian movie Il buono, il brutto, il attivo released in 1966. It is correct that the images are in the public domain in Italy (still frames have only 20 years protection), but the film was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF21 [2]. We can undelete them in 2062, when the film enters in the US public domain.

Günther Frager (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:28码脚型飞机杯（右脚）.jpg

File:28码脚型飞机杯（右脚） (cropped).jpg

Suspected infringe child protection, a sex toy made from child body. See discussion page. Lemonaka (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cropped image: Commons:Deletion requests/File:28码脚型飞机杯（右脚） (cropped).jpg メイド理世 (talk) 03:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemonaka: If the image violates child protection policy, why did you upload a cropped version? Dronebogus (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dronebogus I'm a little bit fuzzy that time. I only cropped the watermark of photos, randomly. Lemonaka (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemonaka: should I add the crop to this DR? Dronebogus (talk) 09:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Lemonaka (talk) 09:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don’t think this constitutes child pornography per se but the implications are sufficiently disturbing/disgusting enough to bring the project into disrepute. For those afraid to click the link: it’s just a silicone foot and is SFW. Dronebogus (talk) 09:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per the previous DR. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:28码脚型飞机杯（右脚）.jpg

Renominated, Suspected ChildPorn, under the request by Special:PermanentLink/903481066#c-Whym-20240723122200-Lemonaka-20240723074300 since last DR was closed badly. Lemonaka (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whym @Dronebogus, requesting again under request, waiting for another sysop to review. Lemonaka (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per same rationale + Yann supervoting and never explaining/reverting it Dronebogus (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like an artificial foot, so where is the CP?

Keep, somewhat disgusting but free file which can be educational used, I don't see any reason to delete. TheImaCow (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheImaCow see the talk pages of this file. Lemonaka (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this -now for some reason globally locked- person who uploaded this dosen't want to be affilated with the image, it might be possible to revision delete the name, but this dosen't change the file being in scope (considering there are MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH more explicit images of this subject like this)

No idea if possession of such dolls is illegal, but images of them or their feet are not, at least I can't see any evidence for that. TheImaCow (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheImaCow this one was locked for cross-wiki abuse. They also uploaded some sex toys previously. @Dronebogus pointed out possible problem of the uploader, see archive of AN:U, the topic is "'Assifbus"' Lemonaka (talk) 02:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted T&S as probably should have been done from the start due to the possible concerns. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 09:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MatrixContacted long ago, no actions taken or replies got. Lemonaka (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:La notte

Still frames from the Italian film La notte released in 1961. These images are currently in the Italian public domain (still frames have a protection of 20 years), but they are still copyrighted in the US. The film was registered in 1962 under the record LP21952 [3] and renewed in 1989 under the record RE0000433071 [4]. We can undelete them in 2057.

Günther Frager (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Per qualche dollaro in più

Screenshots and still frames from the Italian film Per qualche dollaro in più in 1965. The images are in the public domain in Italy (still frames are protected for 20 years), but they are not in the US. The film was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF11 [5]. We can undelete them in 2061.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Елена Велена.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_of_Oh.provista Qa6r (talk) 15:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Per un pugno di dollari

Screenshots or film stills from the Italian film Per un pugno di dollari released in 1964 (Notice that I excluded the press photos and film stills). The images are in the public domain in Italy (film stills are protected for 20 years), but they are still copyrighted in the US. The film was registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF5 [6]. We can undelete them in 2060.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Krystian Korolczuk (talk · contribs)

Presumably uploaded for use in the autobiography they wrote in polish Wikipedia - which I have also listed for deletion on that project. Out of scope personal images of a non-notable individual.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teofil Mazur.jpg

Obvious copyright infringement. There is no license information on the source page. 159.205.179.12 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeśli nie ma oznaczenia o zastrzeżonych prawach autorskich, to można domniemywać, że jest w domenie publicznej. Ledowiczka (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Above: "If there is no copyright marking, it can be presumed that it is in the public domain." PD-Poland, Poland did not allow automatic copyright of anonymous photographs until 1994. --RAN (talk) 00:47, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salvatore Cascio.jpg

Screenshot from the Italian film Nuovo Cinema paradiso released in 1988. The film was registered in the US Copyright Office under the record PA0000495766 [7], thus it is still copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Caligula (film)

Screenshot from Italian film Caligula released in 1979. The film is copyrighted in the US as it was registered in the Copyright Office in 1980 under the record PA0000083587 [8]

Günther Frager (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Una lucertola con la pelle di donna

Screenshots from the Italian film Una lucertola con la pelle di donna published in 1971. The images are in the public domain in the Italy (film still are protected for 20 years), but it is still copyrighted in the US. The opening credits have a copyright notice [9] and its copyright was renewed in the US Copyright Office in 2009 [10].

Günther Frager (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

High-Resolution Images of old Nebraska License plates

Old versions only (Those posted before July 27, 2024)

COM:PRP and COM:TOO. Plate designs probably exceed the threshold of originality, reuploaded low-resolution images to the same file name. QuickWittedHare (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete entire files If they're non-free, the size of the image is irrelevant. We don't allow fair use on this project, and fair use is why non-free images are shrunk on English Wikipedia. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, they are used on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_registration_plates_of_Nebraska as low quality, is that not fair use? If not, would that mean all images of license plates designed post 1985 are all copyright violations? I can open a request to remove all post 1985 designs. QuickWittedHare (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, 1989, not 1985. QuickWittedHare (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I didn't realize you could upload images directly to the English Wikipedia if you wish to use them for fair use. That is my misunderstanding. Delete all files per COM:TOO and COM:PRP QuickWittedHare (talk) 22:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:19-23-038-davis.jpg

The uploader claims copyright, although he is only the photographer. No statement of original author (painter) exists. This is a newly made painting Creuzbourg (talk) 18:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Attribution fixed. Keep if "made public" in 1959. --RAN (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veringenstadt Neubausiedlung Deutstetten 1953.jpg

Improbable own work of the uploader, more than 60 years old at the time of upload. Copyright situation in Germany unclear, but American copyright should certainly still be running until 95 years after publication. Felix QW (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bild zum Eisenbahnunfall Abenheim 24-07-1954 2014-03-10 19-45.jpg

As can be seen at User:Didym/Mobile upload/2014 March 9-12, the user uploaded several copyright violations in this batch of uploads. This is also an unlikely own work since it was almost 60 years old at the time of upload. Felix QW (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catherine Deneuve in Belle de Jour, 1967.jpg

Still frame [11] from the French film Belle de Jour by Luis Buñel (1900-1983) released in 1967. The film is copyrighted in France its country of origin. Notice that the usage of {{PD-Italy}} is incorrect. It was premiered in France in May 24, 1967 [12]. The Italian release was during the Venice Film Festival in September 1967. The usage of {{PD-1996}} is also incorrect. The film is under copyright in the US as it was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF30 [13]. We can undelete it in 2063 when it enters in the US copyright. Günther Frager (talk) 19:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:A ciascuno il suo

Screenshots from the Italian film A ciascuno il suo released in 1967. The usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect because it was registered in the US Copyright Office under the record LF38 [14]. Notice that it is registered under its German name de:Zwei Särge auf Bestellung. We can undelete it in 2063.

Günther Frager (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gewinnung des Penicillin G, Dresden 1949.png

Unlikely own work, uploaded 66 years after the photo was made. Felix QW (talk) 19:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Danger : Diabolik !

Screenshot from Italian film Danger: Diabolik! released in 1967. The usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect. The film was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under record LF26 [15]. We can undelete it in 2063.

Günther Frager (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JMeese dragon flag.JPG

copyvio; congtemp. artwork; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Officer Grayson Body Cam Video.webm

this is a fake video that is being used for propaganda purposes. There is no "Officer Grayson" bodycam video because he never had a camera on. Staticshakedown (talk) 21:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False. The Illinois State Police uploaded all videos related to the Massey shooting on their YouTube page (link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFun2GydGyU&list=FLJuzdjwrT-829RwfH1bEulg). At 28:07 a title "Body Worn Camera #2" is seen. This is officer Grayson's body camera footage. In the subsequent clip (28:20) Massey can be seen throwing the pot at him. This is from the original posted YouTube clip (go see for yourself). There seems to be confusion about whether officer Grayson had his body cam on. The model of body camera he was wearing is designed to record continuously even when "off." When the officer turns their camera on it will capture the previous 30 seconds and save it. In this case, officer Grayson turns his camera "on" immediately after shooting Massey, which caused the video clip of the incident to be captured. The video is not fake and can be clearly seen in the original video posted by the Illinois State Police. BreakingTheDivide (talk) 21:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, blatantly fake videos don't belong on Wikipedia. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are literally unbelievable. Why are you so scared of the public knowing what actually happened? BreakingTheDivide (talk) 01:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, you need to cut it out. You don't even live in America. Why are you so determined that the part about Massey throwing the pot be omitted? BreakingTheDivide (talk) 01:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liliana, I don't think the video is fake UNLESS the Illinois State police is deepfaking bodycam footage. Watch from here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFun2GydGyU&list=FLJuzdjwrT-829RwfH1bEulg go to the 28:00 minute time, make sure you are on a desktop computer and slow the speed to -50 or slower, then honestly provide your thoughts. What I don't understand is the fact that several media outlets mentioned he didn't have his BWC (body worn camera) in operation until AFTER the shooting. If that is true either someone misrepresented that fact accidently, was confused, or outright lied. Either that or the Illinois State police made an AI deepfake video. Transparently speaking I have no idea what to think. However until this video's authenticity can be verified as well as the media coverage of former Deputy Grayson's bodycam inoperability, the video should be removed for further investigation. 97.113.143.148 06:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liliana is not interested in having an honest discussion judging by their interaction with me on Sonya's Wikipedia page. And your stance is very bizarre. There's no authenticity that needs to be verified here. The video is the official video released by the Illinois State Police on their YouTube page which we both linked to. You even said it yourself that the clip I uploaded matches what is seen in the YouTube clip. So why on earth would we delete the media? I already explained why it was reported that his body camera was off. That's because it was off, but right after the shooting he turns it on and it retroactively saved the prior 30 seconds because that's what the camera is designed to do. In fact, when you read the user guide for the specific model of body camera they were wearing (Axon Body 3 X60A7941G) it outlines on page 11 that there are two modes: Ready (Buffering) and Recording (Event). When in ready mode the camera records in a 0-120 second loop and when the camera is switched on to recording mode the previous 0-120 seconds of the recording are saved without audio. The guide notes that by default the camera is set to record a 30 second loop in ready mode without audio but can be configured to record anywhere from 0-120 seconds with audio. Officer Sean Grayson's body camera was clearly set to default mode because exactly 30 seconds of audio free footage is captured before he switches his body camera on which is when the audio kicks in.

The reason I know the make and model of the cameras they were wearing is because it's stamped in the top right of the video released by the Illinois State Police.

Source: https://my.axon.com/s/axon-body-3?language=en_US BreakingTheDivide (talk) 03:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This kind of dispute doesn't seem like any reason to delete a file from Commons. I suggest you have the discussion on the talk page of a relevant Wikipedia article or on the talk page of the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pennsylvania Presidential Election Results 1816.svg

This file has been replaced by File:Pennsylvania Presidential Election Results 1816 by county.svg. It is not used on any article anymore. It does not provide a source for its data and is incorrect. Take Philadelphia, for example. According to A New Nation Votes, the top Monroe elector in Philadelphia recieved 6,874 votes, while the top Unpledged elector recieved 4,107 votes. And yet, here it shows Monroe as losing Philadelphia Wowzers122 (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FelixGarcia1.jpg

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FelixGarcia2.jpg

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FelixGarcia.jpg

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghada el-Samman.jpg

The "own work" attribution seems unlikely to be correct. The user who uploaded it and claimed it as "own work" did add it to the Spanish wikipedia article at that time (diff), but simultaneously cited an article which included the photo in the Arabic 2012 version here. That Arabic article seems to be real source and seems unlikely to be public domain. LEvalyn (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/27

July 27

Files in Category:Aba Nigeria Temple

Files uploaded by Drphungmanhcuong (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Datopaduka (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Datopaduka (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:C'era una volta il West

Files in Category:Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo (film)

Files in Category:La notte

Files in Category:Per qualche dollaro in più

Files in Category:Per un pugno di dollari

Files uploaded by Krystian Korolczuk (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Caligula (film)

Files in Category:Una lucertola con la pelle di donna

High-Resolution Images of old Nebraska License plates

Files in Category:A ciascuno il suo

Files in Category:Danger : Diabolik !

Navigation menu

Search