Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/28

27 August 2024

29 August 2024

Deletion requests on 28 August 2024

August 28

File:Como poner en espera a un cliente....png

appears to be text ad for company, and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-04-11 Garden of the Gods - 374.jpg

Blurred. Hard to tell what the image is about. Nv8200p (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep beside from file name, i think image is good. it is just bad focus. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 20:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad focus means bad image. There is nothing in this image or its description to give it any educational context. Keeping all these POS images makes it harder to find the good ones. IMHO. Nv8200p (talk) 23:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prank Caller.png

One of many similar pics derivative of stock images w/ company logo, uploaded by various accounts to spam their stock site -- COM:SPAM Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Worse than that is that these are likely copyvios. If the images are used by a company, we would need COM:VRT to keep them. However, we should probably not keep images that advise people to do prank calls. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prank a Friend.png

One of many similar pics derivative of stock images w/ company logo, uploaded by various accounts to spam their stock site -- COM:SPAM Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Select a Prank Call.png

One of many similar pics derivative of stock images w/ company logo, uploaded by various accounts to spam their stock site -- COM:SPAM Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Send prank calls and prank your friends.png

One of many similar pics derivative of stock images w/ company logo, uploaded by various accounts to spam their stock site -- COM:SPAM Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onlinepersonalfinance logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yakado-bebe.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spammy sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dharius~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

these are direct violations of COM:Advertisement. links are no no 😡.

Speedy delete. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 19:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:YOGLOVE1.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marika yoga.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for nonnotable yoga practice; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Offizielles Yogan Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trem das Onze.jpg

This is a copyrighted music by Adoniran Barbosa Vitor Hello? 00:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rowa Vmax.jpg

appears to be an edited version of an image online at least as early as 2013, before claimed 2015 date; unclear whether it's this company but the license is dubious https://tineye.com/search/986e5483269b74e037f82ccac260c3cc979831ac?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:High 24.08.11 Remah-16 crop md.jpg

No indication the picture was released under the given license. C F A 💬 01:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allkeyshop logo.svg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nsantos15 (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bd taxation.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep ("bd" username); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BD Archive (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbotsfield School for Boys.jpg

COM:TOO, logo exceeds threshold of originality ~delta (talk) 03:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this was already deleted without notice to this thread. Was it a British school? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crane army ammunition activity.gif

Per COM:TOO ~delta (talk) 03:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This seems to belong to en:Naval_Surface_Warfare_Center_Crane_Division, and thus is PD-US-Navy. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ricardo.kepa.webp

A vandalism of pl.wikipedia.org Kggucwa (talk) 03:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis on the earth.jpg

one of hundreds of images of human penis... out of scope Threecharlie (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie But does the context make it interesting? It does indeed show a penis resting on vegetation. Someone obviously finds that interesting. Brianjd (talk) 13:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone...who?--Threecharlie (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie Whoever uploaded this. Also, if penises in artwork are notable, then surely real penises in different contexts are useful too. Brianjd (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where you see an artistic message I see the usual narcissist who wants to display his reproductive apparatus for anything but such purposes. These are opinions, but as long as there are only two of us it's a nice 50/50, let's wait for other opinions. Good luck.--Threecharlie (talk) 09:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, as per Threecharlie. --Marcok (talk) 09:57, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I have also struggled to whether nominated this file to DR or not. As Brianjd mentioned there is no image of penis on the vegetation (Maybe yes, but I think there is not much). I also think that this may be distinctive enough to be kept on Commons, but I won't be upset if this image ended up deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penis on the earth.jpg

Unnecessary ugly dick. Replace any use and delete. 186.172.152.104 03:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Was previously kept. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to keep all the penis images you want in your personal collection, let's see what the people who care more about Commons will say about this request. 186.172.152.104 11:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penis on grass? Is that a Chinese dish? Tiger penis I suppose... 186.172.152.104 13:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COMMONS:Commons is not censored PaterMcFly (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per all above. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 20:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Penis on the earth.jpg Taylor 49 (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secretary Pompeo and Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.jpg

Scaled-down dupe of File:Secretary Pompeo and Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad (43814331801).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, before today I never saw the image😢 Baginda 480 (talk) 07:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hope the image can delete fast Baginda 480 (talk) 07:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weighted Foreskin Restoration.png

Appears to be taken from an external site, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question What makes you believe it's not the uploaders own work? PaterMcFly (talk) 07:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no metadata, low resolution.... i would have mark it with "no permission" if i see this first. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 20:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work. I can prove this is my photo with individual photos of the items in the photo.

Please do not delete until I have had the opportunity to prove this is my photo NuManDavid (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is nonsense from wherever you look at it. Own work or not is not important when it's dick spam. 186.172.160.88 13:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NuManDavid (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So where we at? NuManDavid (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Point of no return, Deletion. 186.172.160.88 13:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small size and no exif is expressly cited on COM:DR as not a deletion reason per se. NuManDavid, if you can really prove it's your photo, contact COM:VRT, but why don't you provide a full-size photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Reshad Reshidli (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep who is blocked for spam elsewhere; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estás en un avión y abres la ventana meme esqueleto.ogg

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 05:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FeliznavidadSUS.jpg

Derivative work from copyrighted content, this is an edited image of the game character "Among Us" + this file is classified as out the scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 05:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot, Getting Over It With Bennett Foddy.png

Screenshots of copyrighted games. Astrinko (talk) 06:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Okimono omikuji.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel Japan considers toys to be ineligible for copyright as per the page there. Does this mean it should not be deleted? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 07:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

However, US do not consider toys to be utilitarian objects. On Commons, the toy should be copyright-free in both the source country (Japan) and the US. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel does the fact that this is a religious object play any role? I cannot speak 100% to this without finding a source that discusses them, but I think these are believed to be a kind of amulet with protective properties. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 12:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a widespread phenomenon at shrines and it is unfortunate to see it not being documented Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 12:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's unfortunate, but on Commons we had to respect copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel you probably should propose this entire category for deletion then Category:Doubutsu mikuji but is there any way to consolidate the deletion discussion under one page? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 14:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should discuss this other deletion request here Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Shikaumi_Shrine-Okimono_omikuji.jpg Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 13:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think an amulet is a toy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:المقدم سالم بن علي بلجبلي العوبثاني.jpg

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 06:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:المقدم سالم علي بلجبلي العوبثاني.jpg

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 06:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:اليوتيوبر سيد.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 06:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مَدينة ميتة.jpg

Copyrighted Materials: Book covers Michel Bakni (talk) 06:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruth van Crevel in her office at the Rijksherbarium Leiden, 1975.jpg

1975 self portrait? Not own work Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is in my possession, the subject of the photo left it to me in her inheritance, and I know for a fact that she made it herself (she often did this) with the use of a self-timer and tripod.

Thank you for your mindfulness! GksEOauJAn (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact COM:VRT so that this photo is not unnecessarily deleted, and thank you for uploading it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Entre-Nous (subway advertisement) (6252330273).jpg

Derivative image of a subway ad. FOP in Canada does not apply to 2D works. Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted as part of my cleanup of uploads russavia (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entre-Nous (subway advertisement) (6252330273).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARTEMIS-Team (DFKI und Universität Bremen) (10471496575).jpg

Picture of a long ago Project-Team at DFKI-Bremen. Only marginally related to DFKI. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rover ARTEMIS mit Studenten des DFKI und der Uni Bremen (10866827503).jpg

Picture of a long ago Project Team (2013) at DFKI Bremen. Only marginally related to DFKI. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia was obviously misused as a cheap file repository for this photo. Renatoorsini (talk) 08:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Spiritual2001 (talk · contribs)

The ones of Oribamise are likely from pingsunday.com per google (and the watermark bottom left). The other was found here in 2019 https://www.brila.net/team-nigeria-tennis-captain-solanke-excited-with-victorious-outing-at-the-attf-junior-championship/

Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. I already marked other uploads form the same user as clear copyvios. Günther Frager (talk) 14:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikiDataCon 2019 - Poster DFKI - Topic Detection.pdf

A poster from one of the hundreds of projects at DFKI! Absolutely superfluous picture that says nothing about DFKI. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see why this should be a deletion reason. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will take a picture of a toilet in the DFKI building and declare it as related to the organization. Renatoorsini (talk) 08:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SB19 Billboard K POWER 100.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Relayed (talk) 07:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It seems there was a misunderstanding about the photo. The photo or the YouTube video has a 'Creative Commons (reuse allowed)' license. However, I changed the link because it was broken. Royiswariii (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Just saw the original video. I thought the video was taken down, hence thinking it's a copyvio. Will close this request. Relayed (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept(Non admin closure) Relayed (talk) 07:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DFKI 1.JPG

Skewed and unfavourable photo of the entrance area of the DFKI. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (all images nominated by this user) No reason for deletion given. Photo is not blurred or otherwise technically unusable. Images on commons don't need to be favorable (for whatever). PaterMcFly (talk) 07:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main entrance no longer looks like this. I have uploaded a photo that shows the current state. Renatoorsini (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the entrance has changed, then that is a good reason to keep this image for the benefit of anybody researching the history of the building. AlasdairW (talk) 22:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DFKI 2.JPG

Skewed and unfavourable photo of the entrance area of the DFKI. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main entrance no longer looks like this. I have uploaded a photo that shows the current state. Renatoorsini (talk) 08:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete history? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DFKI 3.JPG

Skewed and unfavourable photo of the entrance area of the DFKI. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main entrance no longer looks like this. Renatoorsini (talk) 08:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dfki.jpg

Skewed and unfavourable photo of the entrance area of the DFKI in outdated resolution. Renatoorsini (talk) 07:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Double MetaCat

Going by this and OmegaFallons talk page, as well as my own experiences dealing with it there seems to be a lot of problems with this template. Just to name a few it leads to a bunch of overcategorization. As well as the addition of pointless and obtuse dublicate categories to category structures that are already complex enough without the template being involved. There is also no way what-so-ever to deal with that because the template makes it impossible to remove or otherwise delete the problematic categories it created and added.

It doesn't help that OmegaFallon seems unable or unwilling to deal with most, if not all, of the issues it's causing. There was also no discussion about it or approval by the wider before it was implemented. Which there really should have been considering the massive number of categories it involves. Apparently the template isn't super intuitive or easy to edit either and it doesn't help that there's no documentation. So it should just be deleted. There's no reason we need a template like this one for this particular thing anyway. Nor is there a valid reason to make it impossible to edit or remove categories from thousands of subcategories just because a single user thinks their way of categorizing things is the best way to do it. Adamant1 (talk) 07:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deletion is well possible, including 6 stupid redirects, after removing ca 7'000 transclusions. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure exactly how they work but apparently there's also like 9 subtempletes that will have to be dealt with as well. So its certainly going to be a hassle to deal with, but that's just all the more reason to delete it IMO. Clearly the things way to complex. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once the main template is deleted, the 9 subpages probably can be deleted as well, unless it turns out that they are used by some other template. I discourage overcomplex poorly working or poorly documented templates. Still, the 7'000 transclusions should be removed before deletion. Immediate deletion would not ruin Commons, still it would show ugly red links on 7'000 pages. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. You think I should nominate them for deletion now or it be better to just let an admin deal with them after this is closed depending on how it goes? (I think you could argue they should probably be deleted regardless of what ends up being the outcome of this, but I don't want to screw anything up by nominating for them for deletion in the meantime if there's some wierd dependency thing involved in it or something). --Adamant1 (talk) 21:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you want to delete those ca 7'000 categories? You should probably explicitly nominate them in a separate request. The risk with the task is that some categories become uncategorized. Category:Geography by country by continent uses Template:Double MetaCat whereas Category:Topography by country by continent uses Template:MetaCat, and there are probably other types. Do you want to eliminate all meta categories with double criteria? This is a major principal question. Alternatively, the templates Template:Double MetaCat and Template:MetaCat could be simplified and merged. It's undeniably a mess now. Not sure whether all meta categories with double criteria deserve deletion. On the User_talk:OmegaFallon#Template:Country_by_year_by_topic user page there is some discussion, but not a consensus for deletion. Taylor 49 (talk) 01:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you want to delete those ca 7'000 categories? No. I want to delete however many it takes to cleanup the mess. If that's three, cool. If it's all 7000, that's cool to. I didn't look at every single category before I started this though because it's really a separate issue IMO to the overall issues caused by the template. I did decide to take this particular route instead of just nominating the 7000 categories for deletion in separate individual deletion requests though because the categories will just recreated or added back to other ones if they are deleted without template being dealt with in the meantime.

But the fact is that most, if not, all "meta categories with double criteria" are either just totally pointless, duplicate existing categories, make no sense, clearly go against the guidelines or have some combination of those issues. So say I have 5 of those 7000 categories deleted. Then all it takes is someone adding this template to something and we're right back where we started. That's fine, but I do think that we as users should have the say in how and when this template is used and it's pretty clear we don't have the say in either one.

In a perfect world that could probably be solved by pairing it down and documenting it. I don't really see that happening though and I rather live in reality then let it continue causing problems for no other reason then...What exactly? "Someone created it so it must be worth having"? It seems like you at least agree with me that it's a mess. It's fine if you don't think deleting the template is the way to clean it up. But realistically what actual alternative to deal with it beyond that is there at this point? --Adamant1 (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

Architect is Max Dudler, how is still alive. Up today we don't have a permission from Max Dudler. Freedom of panorama does not apply to interior shots in Germany. See also previous discussions.

Lukas Beck (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep copyright extremism see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany#Freedom_of_panorama & Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_in_Germany. I do believe these photos are covered by freedom of panorama. Multichill (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Freedom of panorama does clearly not apply to interior shots in Germany. This is clearly stated in this section. How do you come to the conclusion that this should suddenly no longer be true? You even link to the right article. Lukas Beck (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Picture * File:Eröffnungszug U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.jpg was shot during an offical press ceremony by the Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), including an accreditation process. Only selected persons had access. The owner (BVG) permited photograph shots. In this case, freedom of panorama does not exist at all. Further, the train is here the main topic of the picture. So whats the problem? Trouper3000 (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
owner and copyright holder are two different thinks! Lukas Beck (talk) 11:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The architect designed the station in behalf of the BVG so they should have the rights. Otherwise they could not make such an event. I think normally we trust accreditations, especially if they are from public institutions. GPSLeo (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The proposal to accept photos inside train stations in Germany has not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . It was finalized after this DR was started. So regrettably, these photos have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

Copyright protection! German freedom of panorama does not apply for interior shots. The architect is Max Dudler, who is still alive.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nothing sufficiently creative to copyright. It's a simple granite stone wall and a blue ceiling. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, I revised my desicion, per this discussion on my talk page. , the ceiling it is not simple blue, it is a starry sky based on creative design. Ping User:IronGargoyle for courtesy. -- Ellywa (talk) 07:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

Photo's of this starry ceiling are uploaded again and again. This is not allowed, the design is still copyrighted, and there is no FOP in Germany. Photos inside train stations in Germany have in addition not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . Therefore these images should be deleted imho.

Ellywa (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"there is no FOP in Germany". Wrong. 100% wrong. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP for building interiors!!! Lukas Beck (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not what you wrote! Be clear in what you write! We talk about difficoult problems here, so there's no space for unclearness. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The reversal above is clearly wrong. Sometimes we adhere too much to consistent decisions even when the past decisions were clearly wrong. Just having pinpoint lights in a ceiling is not sufficiently creative. Note that there is nothing artistic about their placement. It is a simple repeating pattern. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I don't think it has to be a complex painting or the like. Sometimes it's also a simple but creative idea what counts, and in case of a "starry sky"-like ceiling of an underground station it's definitely a creative idea. And yes, according to German law interior shots, including public interiors, are not FoP-covered. @Marcus Cyron: does Wikimedia Deutschland do any effort to get German FoP laws amended in more liberal direction for us? --A.Savin 08:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think there are definitely efforts in the background. There was also the idea that we need to bring this question to the court in some way but in the past there was not a singe known case where the architect of a train or underground station tried to enforce the copyright on the building. GPSLeo (talk) 09:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How should I know? I don't have any ties to this club anymore. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. --A.Savin 18:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt this is over COM:TOO Germany. Is it more complex than this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There I see only a {{PD-textlogo}}. Yes definitely, architectural design is more complex anyway. --A.Savin 20:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:《黑神话：悟空》手办热销设计者：中国IP海外输出扬眉吐气.webm

This video includes cutscenes of the game itself (0:00-0:03, 0:23-0:26, 1:22-1:28, 2:08-2:13, 3:34-3:51), which is obviously not free content. (本视频包含游戏画面，很明显并非自由版权内容) №.N (talk) 08:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be difficult to argue de minimis when large parts of the video zooms in and focuses on copyrighted 3D artwork. --Cold Season (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a reason to delete the file, those cutscenes can be blacked. About the 3D Artwork, why do we assume that the authors did'nt autorize the Chinese State News Agency to use those artworks?--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 14:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about assuming is irrelevant (and let's say that they did authorized them to use it, so what?). You need to provide evidence that the 3D artwork is free to be used, if that's the angle you are arguing. It is not free, per the copyright as stated by Game Science. The 3D artwork does not appear incidentally and is, in fact, the main focus of the video. --Cold Season (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:《黑神话：悟空》里的法宝现身上海闵行博物馆.webm

This video includes cutscenes of the game itself (0:00-0:12), which is obviously not free content. (本视频包含游戏画面，很明显并非自由版权内容) №.N (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a reason to delete the file, those scenes can be blacked.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 14:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should black the scene before uploading the file.--№.N (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 1755Today’s assignment.jpg

Out of scope (half of an airplane visible behind the trees, image taken from the ground) -- Deadstar (msg) 08:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arnex-sur-Nyon vue du ciel.jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nyon vue du ciel 2.jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marchissy vue du ciel.jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yverdon-les-Bains vue du ciel.jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaillard (France).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Annemasse (France).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fully (VS).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Fils du Roi (The King's Son) 1906.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jake Wartenberg as Copyvio (db-copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow or discussion, as Jaqueline Marval, if she is really the painter, died already in 1932. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Covered by {{PD-Art}}. Painting is by Jacqueline Marval (d. 1932) FAMM collection, news article (though that gives a different title). French copyright ends 70 years after death, so this has been PD since 1992. File information and license have been updated/corrected. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chamoson (VS).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz

This train station was built in 2016. This art is unfree until 2087. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.

Lukas Beck (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,

as creator of this work, I have to admit, that I don't have special rights for this art. You can delete it.

BR

GodeNehler GodeNehler (talk) 07:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the nominator and uploader. Both the architecture of the train station and the artwork on the walls are clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz

The images were uploaded after the deletion request, but are protected by copyright for the same reason. There is no freedom of panorama for interior shots in Germany.

Lukas Beck (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das Copyright von dauerhaft in öffentlich zugängigen Bahnhöfen angebrachter Kunst in Deutschland ist nicht geklärt und wird nur von einigen Rechtsanwälten, nicht unbedingt ohne Eigennutz, angenommen. Ich bin für Behalten, solange es kein gegensätzliches Urteil gibt. -- Kürschner (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wir haben dieses Thema lang und breit diskutiert und das Ergebnis ist auf Löschen gefallen. Dieses Urteil mehrerer erfahrender Admins und weiterer qualifizierter Mitwirkender sollten wir beachten. Am Ende haben wir auf Commons die Regelung, Bilder auch dann zu löschen, wenn es nur begründete Zweifel am Urheberrechtsstatus gibt. So oder so sehe ich keine Rechtfertigung, diese Bilder nicht zu entfernen. Lukas Beck (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt nach wie vor zahllose Artikel zu deutschen U-Bahnhöfen, die noch bebildert sind. Ältere Berliner U-Bahnhöfe vielleicht mal ausgenommen sollte doch nach der Argumentation nahezu kein Bild in den Artikeln zu deutschen U-Bahnhöfen mehr möglich sein, das die Architektur zeigt und nicht irgendein belangloses Detail? --FloSch (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Argumentation ist für mich nicht nachvollziehbar. Wir können keine urheberrechtlich geschützten Bilder behalten, nur da diese für Bebilderungen von Artikeln benötigt werden. Das Urheberrecht steht dabei über nahezu allem. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genau das sage ich doch gerade und wundere mich darüber, warum es noch so viele Bilder von U-Bahnhöfen in der Wikipedia gibt. In de:U-Bahn München sind auf jeden Fall noch so einige, für die es ein Architekten-Copyright gibt. Warum stellst du da keine Löschanträge? FloSch (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Florian, Commons ist ein unvollkommenes Projekt und wird das auf absehbare Zeit bleiben. Besteht also ein Zustand über Jahre, muss das nicht bedeuten dass es auch richtig so ist. Ganz im Gegenteil, oft ist es das gerade nicht. Alles steht und fällt auf freiwilliger Mitarbeit; und jeder, einschließlich dir, sei ausdrücklich ermuntert auch mal selbst mitzuhelfen, das schließt eben auch Löschanträge mit ein. MfG --A.Savin 08:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collonge-Bellerive (GE).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nude - Women with Children.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jake Wartenberg as Copyvio (db-copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as painter María Gutiérrez Blanchard died already in 1932. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep {{PD-Art}} by artist who died in 1932, so PD in France since 1992. Will update the file information and license. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nantua (Ain , France).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villefranche-sur-Saône (Rhône, France).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vernier (GE).jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 09:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Republik Indonesia Serikat.jpg

fake emblem Veracious (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fictional or bad rendition of File:National emblem of Indonesia Garuda Pancasila.svg. JPG of File:Coat of arms of United States of Indonesia.svg, based on File:Winner Republik Indonesia Serikat (United States of Indonesia) COA 1950.jpg. See also File talk:Coat of arms of United States of Indonesia.svg. Bennylin (yes?) 02:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:قلعه ی ده چی.jpg

There is a date on the photo Mostafameraji (talk) 09:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings to you

Watermark on the photo is against the encyclopedic rules.

You can use the "Crop Tools" tool in the Wikipedia repository to remove this problem so that the photo is not deleted.

Wishing you all the best. Mostafameraji (talk) 22:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nyon vue du ciel.jpg

L'auteur a constaté que son œuvre avait été trop souvent piratée. Il a donc décidé de la retirer d'internet. Jeremy.toma (talk) 10:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thoiry (Ain, France).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fpt.png

Unused and very small logo. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feria de Almería 2024 4.jpg

Because it is totally blurry Макс2022 (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not very blurry and is usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Günther Steines-28-09-1928 - 04-06-1982 2013-07-13 22-11.jpg

wrong author, no source, no date Goesseln (talk) 10:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Syfullah Nabil (talk · contribs)

While the user seems to be a valid user, commons is still not your webhost or photoalbum

Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe enough global contributions for 5 personal images to be ok. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROYLEVI.jpg

copyvio - screenshot from December 2013 Mia Schem interview withe Channel 13 (link to interview) DGtal (talk) 11:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Twhitewhite (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work, one is marked (c) in exif, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jetboat Miami Florida.jpg

No educational value, only used as a 'profile picture'(!) . Commons is not for storing your vacation snaps. Out of scope 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Usable picture of a Jetboat in a marina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiliahedron.stl

misinformation GeometricExplorer (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GeometricExplorer: Please be more specific. Your current reason is not a valid reason for deletion. ···日本穣 ^{Talk to Nihonjoe} 17:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.InseElem.jpg

No educational value Hoo man (talk) 11:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:American corporate flag.jpg

The Adbusters corporate flag is the main subject of this file, and it is uploaded as fair use on English Wikipedia due to it being a derivative of multiple non-free logos. Xeroctic (talk) 12:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savingscom-logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Karrosimo91 (talk · contribs)

Promotional corporate images, COM:WEBHOST and advertising, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without meaningful edits.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facetune 30-07-2024-18-43-55.jpg

Image present on https://www.aia-figc.it/news/olimpiadi-nuova-designazione-per-paolo-valeri-in-sala-var-23051/. Unclear that this is really own work by @Malcometoy. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PADG CABROL PULL NOIR.jpg

Ne fournit aucune preuve de respect des droits d'auteur Mickaël en résidence (talk) 13:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KR 1996 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://invitemyguest.in/templates/images/users/QkEU70WFFLacJwI8M9VV.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KR 1996 (talk · contribs)

Likely not own works: mostly low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data or credit to someone else (many with FB/transmission code, and .File:Mridula Mukherjee on Foundation Day of National Movement Front.jpg is credited to "VISHAL PAL").

P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cliff Hanley.jpg

1972 photo, unlikely to be own work. Needs VRT Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why unlikely? User:Joburley could easily be someone in their 70s. Before what year do you consider it unlikely for it to be own work? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Anthony Mary Claret statue at the Claret School in Quezon City.jpg

Photo of a relatively new sculpture. No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stemma.Card.Sforza.JPG

the family crest of cardinal guido ascanio sforza shown on this page is wrong Giudice123 (talk) 13:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's also COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zachary L Green.jpg

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data/watermark not matching the uploader. And not notable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mearcdloc (talk · contribs)

Bogus PD license, needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikigrafico stemmi 5000.svg

Courtesy deletion: per discussion on itwiki this barnstar has been replace by Wikigrafico stemmi 1500.svg. This version could be deleted as it has no other COM:SCOPE. Thanks! Arrow303 (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shikaumi Shrine-Okimono omikuji.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a religious object, not a toy, can we consolidate the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Okimono omikuji.jpg as with the rest of the category? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 13:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xie Bing Ang (talk · contribs)

Unused doodles, no educational value, out of scope. And taken from website, fails COM:LR.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hsosaj (talk · contribs)

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SimoAli98 (talk · contribs)

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unione Democratica Sarda.jpg

Logo above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very obviously so. Delete unless it's old enough to be PD (and I doubt something that looks like this would be, but it's worth investigating). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Groovalutionary for wikipedia.jpg

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alejandro Cisneros (talk · contribs)

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goethe in der Campagna (Iphigenie).jpg

replaced by File:Goethe in the Roman Campagna (SM 1157) (Detail, relief).png Carl Ha (talk) 14:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goethe in der Campagna (Grabmal).jpg

replaced by File:Goethe in the Roman Campagna (SM 1157) (Detail, Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella).png Carl Ha (talk) 14:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dice and Character Sheet (3419936702).jpg

Character sheet is a copyrighted design. oknazevad (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you're allowed to post artistic photos which contain copyrighted objects under fair use. In this case, the character sheet details aren't 100% clear with the dice & pen on top. This isn't a usable scan of that character sheet. Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no COM:FAIRUSE on Commons. Some Wikipedias allow files to be uploaded locally for fair use under specific conditions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This proposal has been listed at the following project: WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC) [reply]

I don't believe it is, at least as depicted here.

In general, character sheets are primarily functional objects, not copyrightable works of art, and this certainly applies here. This sheet (like many others) is mostly made up of simple elements like boxes, lines, and checkboxes, which are elements that are too generic to be considered original.

If the entire character sheet was clearly depicted, one would be able to argue that the copyrighted logo makes the photograph a copyright violation. However, that part of the photograph is out of focus and blurred, and thus de minimis applies. And even if it doesn't, that part of the image can easily be edited to be even more blurred to make the logo completely unrecognizable, thus making deletion unnecessary. --Veikk0.ma (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mosab ALsbooul

هناك نقص في التعبير Mosab ALsbooul (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aiuhjwsdfgh.jpg

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schaller M6 Locking.jpg

Keine ordentliche Lizenzierung Lutheraner (talk) 15:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:S-Locks-Box-Gold.jpg

Keine ordentliche Lizenzierung Lutheraner (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:تمت المطالبة بهذه الأراضي بشكل دائم من قبل إمبراطورية كوانديل دينغل وجارتين جيغلزون ہوں.webp

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schaller GTC Hauser.jpg

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung, als Urheber wird Schaller GmbH angegeben, Urheber kann aber nur einr natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 15:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schaller Signum Steg.jpg

Keine ordentliche Lizenzierung Lutheraner (talk) 15:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schaller LockMeister Tremolo.jpg

Keine ordentliche Lizenzierung Lutheraner (talk) 15:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schaller Logo371.jpg

Keine ordentliche Lizenzierung Lutheraner (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurotram.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Eurotram 1005 (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too late. It's COM:INUSE and beyond the 1-week courtesy deletion period. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:صورة ميلاد عمر موسى مصلح المقيبعي.png

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cambridge Design Vector.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JCC Network Beground Logos.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte FFI.jpg

je suis la propriétaire, j'ai supprimé mon article où cette image apparaissait Florence Lanquetin (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

je suis la propriétaire, j'ai supprimé mon article où cette image apparaissait, je ne veux plus que cette image soit sur internet, elle apparait sur google, c'est un membre de ma famille, je veux protéger ma famille, je ne veux pas que ses membres soient sur internet 2A01:CB0C:ADF:7400:855E:264E:CA5B:1FD4 01:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with deletion, but I'm confused by the question of why you uploaded this personal image in the first place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:王炳南.jpg

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo grey.PNG

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for software; no usage or potential usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Key Underwear.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fellody.com official logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:OneMAK logo web.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CamWright1111 (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep (one image description suggests as much); no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brend Tuning Center.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pétain - portrait photographique.jpg

Copyrighted in the United States. The copyright of this image did not expire by 1 January 1996. Freedom4U (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per public domain in the US, per {{PD-1996}}. --2001:4452:152:2600:549A:7BE:31C5:B6B0 01:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That template states pretty clearly that it doesn't cover works that were still copyrighted in their home country on 1 January 1996. Freedom4U (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not PD-US (copyright in France didn't expire until after 1996) so it clearly violates Commons copyright policy. Buidhe (talk) 13:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless documentation can be provided regarding its publication history. Emiya1980 (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am seeing a 1942 date on an non-cropped version of the photo that looks an awful lot like a published version (view 24). That would be more than 70 years ago. I'm also seeing what looks like letters sent in 1940 (view 26) and 1941 (view 27). So I'm a Delete until 2035 unless I'm missing something. For future reference, the uploaded image was view 23. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 04:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For us to maintain an image on Commons, it's our responsibility as users to demonstrate that we have a right to do so, whether because of something like Creative Commons licensing or the image lapsing into the public domain in the United States. Neither can be demonstrated for this image. Hydrangeans (talk) 21:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-NEROPURO.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Delbrück i. Westf.

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Heinrich Niedieck, who died in 1955. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2026.

Rosenzweig τ 17:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mauzikltd (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by brand rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RentCars (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Team-Meridian.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astrakos-logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Renard arch 1949.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily a deletion reason, but this is obviously not own work, and is it public domain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Renard 1949.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Renard2.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autoportrait Marcel Renard.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Renard de face.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaque du Marché couvert Montauban.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marché couvert Montauban.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Renard signature.png

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Renard.jpg

Page supprimé IcebergBlack (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jo Mora 1931 Yosemite map.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Netherzone as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image has a "public domain" license "copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years", yet it was created in 1931 and the creator of this work died in 1947. I am failing to understand how it could be in the pubic domain out of copyright. Yann (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also US works from 1931 need a copyright notice, and a renewal 28 years later. Yann (talk) 17:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of the map is "©1931 JO MORA." That takes the image to at least 1931+28=1959. If the copyright was not renewed, then it is PD. If the copyright was renewed, that would take it to 1931+56=1987. COM:Hirtle chart says published with notice between 1929 and 1963 and renewed, then the term is 95 years after publication: 1931+95=2026. It would have to be published after 1978 for the 70 pma term to kick in (1947+70=2017).

It is all about whether the copyright was renewed.

https://www.yosemite.ca.us/library/maps/jo_mora/ suggests that it was not renewed. However, it also claims the 1931 map was black and white; the color map was published in 1941 and has some differences. Even if the 1931 map had not been renewed, we need to check if the 1941 version was renewed. Glrx (talk) 00:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining. I don't have any vested interest in keeping the map. Is there a mechanism to automatically delete it and its transclusions, and automatically restore them in 2026? Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 06:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the copyright tag to {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. Glrx (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Glrx: Did you check the registers for renewals? Yann (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did a Google search for variations of "Jo Mora" last night and only turned up one registration/renewal. I did not check the actual volumes (I've only done book searches before). Today I've been looking at a lot of other Jo Mora images. Glrx (talk) 15:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Jacinto Mora. Jo Mora (Q6204370). Glrx (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's more to fix: same image already on Commons:

Glrx (talk) 15:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:محمد سليماني.jpg

This is an image that was going to be used for an article, but the article was deleted (w:en:Draft:Mohammed Slimani) Ahmedgalal433 (talk) 17:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It still could be a useful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of the Office of the Prime Minister of Thailand.png

Duplicate of File:Seal of the Office of the Prime Minister of Thailand.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:4S19221.jpg

Possible copyvio: There is a watermark on the bottom right, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sarodiyabrothers (talk · contribs)

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have just accepted permission for “File:Sarodiya Brothers.png” under ticket:2024090310004796. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 20:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just accepted permission for “File:Telegraph Online Edugraph 18 under 18 Award 2024.png” under ticket:2024090310005339. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 05:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just accepted permission for “File:The Doverlane Music Conference Winner's Award.png” under ticket:2024090310005115. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 05:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just accepted permission for “File:Bharat Ratna Dr. M.S. Subbulakshmi Fellowship Award 2022.png” under ticket:2024090310005188. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 17:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nosferatu (1922).webm

While the 1922 film Nosferatu may be in the public domain, this file comes from a 2006 Blu-Ray restoration that contains new, copyrightable elements. 64.203.142.238 18:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete And what would these "new, copyrightable elements" be, exactly? As far as I know, the restoration was done with the intention to recreate the original as it was shown in 1922 as closely as possible, so "new, copyrightable elements" would be totally contrary to the goal of the restoration. So, for lack of new elements that pass the threshold of originality, I don't think we can delete the file based on this argument (as the newly recorded soundtrack, wich certainly *is* copyrighted, is not included), but there may be another reason: In Germany, there is a related right, the so-called "Schutz wissenschaftlicher Ausgaben", or protection of scholarly editions, with a duration of 25 years. If this 2006 restoration counts as a "scholarly edition" of the film, it would still be protected until 2031. But I can't imagine any additional protection, so, if we're cautious and delete the file as a possible "scholarly edition", I think it could be listed for undeletion in 2032, not too far in the future. This based on the fact that the film as such is now in the public domain in its country of origin, Germany, too (since 2020), as all participating creators of relevance for the term of protection according to German law have now died more than 70 years ago (see this 2023 discussion in German-language Wikipedia). In the US, it has entered the public domain a long time ago, anyway. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding @Gestumblindi: Do we have a reason to believe that this version does indeed contain any new, copyrightable elements? And, if that is not the case, does the restoration of a film, and more specificially this kind of restoration, fall under the 25-year protection for "scholarly editions" (sec. 70 of the German Copyright Act)? Gnom (talk) 10:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding some further context: The film was originally shown not in pure black and white, but tinted in several colors, and such a tinted copy was the base for this restoration (as per the file description). Gestumblindi (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nosferatu (1922) 1995 restoration.webm

While the 1922 film Nosferatu may be in the public domain, this file comes from a 1995 restoration that contains new, copyrightable elements. 64.203.142.238 18:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrew Martin (cropped) (cropped).jpg

Possible copyvio: The original source from Paul Billet is deleted, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tweets Ads Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Putri Sistha (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Codebud group logo 2023.webp

Unused corporate logo Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Digital Printing.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RupeeRedee.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtWizard's Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goaco.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NOTICIAS DIGITAL HONDURAS.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunrise in Rolling Fork on March 25, 2023.jpg

The original source of this image, as cited in the StoryMaps source this was found on, is the w:Vicksburg Daily News. The image is from this story on March 26, 2023.

It was taken by David Day, and there is no claim that he was acting as an employee of the US federal government (He appears to be on the newspaper's staff), or that the photo was ineligible for copyright for any other reason. Therefore, as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright existed from the moment it was taken.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 18:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Une paire de hochets en vannerie chèbè ou chègbè.png

This image is likely not own work, comes from archives. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ragavanka (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: miscellaneous plain text documents.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 20:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ragavanka (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: further miscellaneous plain text documents, some of them duplicates of ones previously deleted.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Werner Dedl - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Werner Dedl - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazon Echo Dot Kids 5th Edition.jpg

Delete Now that you mention it, I did make a mistake in uploading this as it does violate that rule. TaurusEmerald (talk) 21:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayratayrat (talk · contribs)

No FOP in Uzbekistan and no FOP in Kazakhstan; some came via Facebook; one DW without source.

~~File:Feeding ducks on the Lake Teploe.jpg~~ (Ufa; withdrawn)
~~File:Sportivnaya is a stopping point Ufa.jpg~~ (Ufa; withdrawn)
File:Zhanakorgan station.jpg (Zhanakorgan, Zhanakorgan District, Kyzylorda Region, Kazakhstan; no FOP in Kazakhstan)
File:Turin Polytechnic Institute (Tashkent branch)1.jpg (Toshkent; no FOP in Uzbekistan)
File:Turin Polytechnic Institute (Tashkent branch).jpg (Toshkent; no FOP in Uzbekistan)
File:Air sampling point MNA-1.jpg (DW, flash photo of an unidentified matte finish photo)
File:One of the very few inscriptions in Karelian in Petrozavodsk.jpg (came via Facebook)
File:Consulate General of Uzbekistan in St. Petersburg 2.jpg (sovereign territory of Uzbekistan; no FOP in Uzbekistan; came via Facebook)
File:Consulate General of Uzbekistan in St. Petersburg.jpg (sovereign territory of Uzbekistan; no FOP in Uzbekistan; came via Facebook)
~~File:Central asian russian peterburg.jpg~~ (St. Petersburg; withdrawn)
File:House at the intersection of Rybatskaya street and Maly Prospekt Petrogradskaya side.jpg (came via Facebook)
File:Bolshaya Zelenina 13.jpg (came via Facebook)
File:House on Prospect Dynamo.jpg (came via Facebook)
File:The house at the intersection of Rybatskaya street and Maly Prospekt Petrogradskaya side.jpg (came via Facebook)

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: freedom in Uzwhatstan? Please, check location of each image with some 1000 miles precision and remove irrelevant items from this delreq. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

reaction to the initial list

Keep (with possible exception for two “Turin Polytechnic Institute (Tashkent branch)” items) everything. Uzbekistan has no jurisdiction over photography rights in Russia and Kazakhstan, even if it’s an exterior view of their consulate. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need time to reconsider in light of Special:Diff/337790780. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: I have withdrawn three and annotated the rest. Sorry for the delay. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Zhanakorgan_station.jpg (no FoP, but also no art appears in the frame), Delete remaining ten files. Even the “Consulate General” (which arguably could be defended against FoP charge) bears the FBMD stuff. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted 11 per discussion. Zhanakorgan_station deleted as COM:FOP Kazakhstan says NC use - "except for cases .... when the image of the work is used for commercial purposes". --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ayratayrat (talk · contribs)

Author is Грунтовая Лаборатория Механика, not the uploader.

Yann (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ex-Philippe Estimated Rainfall map 24h 2023-10-08 1600Z.png

This image is sourced from an interactiive mapping tool (Esri) embedded in an NWS web page.[1]

1. It contains a precipitation map which is in the public domain as a work of the US federal government, overlayed on a basemap provided by Garmin and by Here Maps, credited in the image itself. Coming from Garmin and Here, whatever elements each is providing to the basemap are presumably protected by copyright.

The web tool lets you change the basemap, and it looks like at least the Topographic version contains only free imagery (USGS), but I couldn't figure out how to combine this with the precipitation data.

2. Regardless of how differently we might interpret part of the NWS general disclaimer, this particular image is directly and unambiguously covered by the part that reads "Third-party information and imagery are used under license by the individual third-party provider. This third-party information may contain trade names, trademarks, service marks, logos, domain names, and other distinctive brand features to identify the source of the information. This does not imply an endorsement of the third-party data/products or their provider by NOAA/National Weather Service. Please contact the third-party provider for information on your rights to further use these data/products."[2]

This is a clear copyvio and we need to delete it in its current form.

Maybe someone can regenerate the image without the copyrighted elements? Simply cropping them out would also work, but I think this would lose important context for the map. Rlandmann (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Weak delete per PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 11:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – For several reasons, this should be kept. First off, the rainfall data is clearly the work of a U.S. government employee working for NOAA. This is confirmed via the NOAA logo in the top-right corner. The entire deletion reasoning rests on the background being somehow copyrighted, despite the satellite view clearly not being produced by a human. I also do not believe any aspect of this image is not free-to-use, given a U.S. government employee used it for official work, which was published to the public. That said, going on the sole theory of the nominator being correct (note, I don't believe they are correct), I fail to see how a satellite view, clearly made via a satellite/computer with almost certainly no human interaction, at least no human manually changing the satellite's data, meets the threshold of originality. What I see is a U.S. government employee, while on official duty, creating a map, with official government data, using satellite data, which was almost certainly not manually altered by a human between the satellite capturing photo & computer posting it. That does not pass the threshold of originality in my books, and the official U.S. government logo/known creation help me believe that as well. WeatherWriter (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merooj-trademark.png

Hello, this image is the logo of a sports company, which is placed without considering the terms of fair use and with the wrong license AMiR SLiDER (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The 2002 Van Wert, Ohio F4 Tornado.png

This image is a screencap from this video hosted on the NWSNorthernIndiana YouTube channel, which credits it to the Ohio State Highway Patrol.

The Ohio State Highway Patrol is part of the Ohio Department of Public Safety, and not an agency of the US federal government. There is no presumption that the video this frame was captured from is ineligible for copyright.

The video does seem to have been created via a dashcam. (Compare this OSHP dashcam footage; warning: graphic content) However there is clearly a human operator turning the camera to follow the tornado's path, so this does not fall under PD-automated.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 20:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Strong delete per precautionary principle. Borders license laundering. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 11:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romain Mehlen.jpg

I dont want to share my image anymore. Frank3111 (talk) 21:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, unidentified portrait with no source (looks like a photo/scan of a printed photo). Omphalographer (talk) 23:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twin landspouts south of Milton-Freewater, Oregon on March 5, 2024.jpg

This image of an event that happened on March 6, 2024 was published on the @NWSPendleton X stream with the attribution "Thank you to Tonya Brewer for sharing these pictures with us!"[3]

There is no claim that she was acting as an employee of the US federal government, or that the photo was ineligible for copyright for any other reason. Therefore, as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright existed from the moment it was taken.

The attribution does not claim or imply that the photographer transferred her rights into the public domain or published this image under a free license.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Strong delete again possible license laundering. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 11:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pé de Chinesa.jpg

This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ +/−

Kongs (talk) 21:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not real. The TV Series isn’t produced, being fake news and the image was conceived through AI.

A imagem não é real. A novela não está em produção, sendo uma notícia falsa e a imagem foi concebida por meio de IA. Kongs (talk) 21:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The photograph of the tornado in Madera County, California on March 1, 2024.png

This image of an event that happened on March 2, 2024 is a screencap taken from a video that was published on the @NWSHanford X stream, [4] crediting it further in the thread "it came from a user on Facebook - Gillian Salgado".[5]

There is no claim that she was acting as an employee of the US federal government, or that the photo was ineligible for copyright for any other reason. Therefore, as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright existed from the moment it was taken.

The attribution does not claim or imply that the videographer transferred her rights into the public domain or published this video under a free license. (indeed, the NWS only credited the creator when someone from the LA Times sought permission to use it)

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per precautionary principle. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 11:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A tornado photogaphed by Byron Hurley near Athensville, Illinois on April 18, 2024.jpg

This image of an event that happened on April 19, 2024 was re-tweeted on the @NWSStLouis X stream[6]

The original tweet was by Byron Hurley (@ByronNatureMan).

There is no claim that he was acting as an employee of the US federal government, or that the photo was ineligible for copyright for any other reason. Therefore, as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright existed from the moment it was taken.

A re-tweet by the NWS does not claim or imply that the photographer transferred his rights into the public domain or published this image under a free license.

Indeed, later in the same thread, multiple media outlets including @WeatherNation, KMOV, and @FOXWeatherDesk ask for permission to re-publish the image, to which he replies every time, "DM me for licensing"

This is clearly not a free image. Rlandmann (talk) 22:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per precautionary principle. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 10:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ludwig von Stieglitz.jpg

Der Name dieser Datei entspricht nicht der dargestellten Person. Das Bild wird bereits unter https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drachenfels_Litho.jpg verwendet unter der richtigen Bezeichnung. Eine zeitgenössische Darstellug von Ludwig von Stieglitz ist unter https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Stieglitz#/media/Datei:Ludwig_Baron_Stieglitz_1779_Arolsen_-1843_St._Petersburg.jpg zu finden, die mit den erhaltenen Ölporträts in Übereinstimmung zu bringen ist. Sixtnitgern (talk) 22:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sixtnitgern: Peter Geymayer, der das Bild hochgeladen hat, ist leider schon verstorben. --Kuhni74 (talk) 23:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. Edit the file description as needed and change the filename or request COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre Commercial Bercy 2 - Charenton-le-Pont (FR94) - 2024-08-28 - 1.jpg

COM:FOP France, there is no FOP in France Wiiformii (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RS Group logo.svg

Same argument as I made in Commons:Deletion requests/File:RS Group plc logo.jpg; the UK has a very low threshold for copyright protection. It would be fine to host locally on enWiki and deWiki. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Chamot at Sloane Square 1984. Photograph Dr. Anthony Parton.jpg

Multiple file of this image - I just added this image without realizing that I had already uploaded it last year! Polotnikov (talk) 22:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014-03-01 10-35-39 graffiti-usine-zvereff.jpg

Clear derivative work of a Breaking Bad poster [7] that is clearly copyrighted. Günther Frager (talk) 23:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I didn't know that.--ComputerHotline (talk) 05:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livermore View East from McLeod Building 1896 01.jpg

Publication date is unknown and may be after 1929: Livermore Heritage Guild states that people should not use the photos without permission and it should probably be assumed that they are right. (see [8]) Mrfoogles (talk) 23:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livermore View East from McLeod Building 1896 uncaptioned.jpg

Publication date is unknown and may be after 1929: Livermore Heritage Guild states that people should not use the photos without permission and it should probably be assumed that they are right. (see [9]) Mrfoogles (talk) 23:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Busts of Néstor Kirchner

Sculptures installed in Argentina where there is no freedom of panorama.

Günther Frager (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lets Comply.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bust of Néstor Kirchner in Quito

There is no freedom of panorama in Ecuador.

Günther Frager (talk) 23:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio: According to the file information, the author says that this logo is copyright-free, but it is unclear whether this means it is in the public domain (or licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0). So this logo may not be acceptable on Commons. Momiji-Penguin (talk) 00:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]