User talk:A1Cafel/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

taggings

Hi, I've replaced you copyvio-taggings of some uploads of User:AnbyG by no-perm-tags, after I've asked him/her via user-mail for comment. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

High-rises

Hi. Is there FoP for buildings in Japan? --E4024 (talk) 03:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

@E4024: Yes, please see COM:FOP Japan--A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:09554jfSM City North EDSAfvf 08.jpg

Hello. Is File:09554jfSM City North EDSAfvf 08.jpg de minimis or not? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: IMO it isn't. The advertisement occupied a large portion of the right. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:International_Women's_Day_in_2017_by_country

Category discussion warning

International Women's Day in 2017 by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

File:7440Photos taken 2020 coronavirus pandemic Baliuag, Bulacan 11.jpg

Hello A1Cafel. Is File:7440Photos taken 2020 coronavirus pandemic Baliuag, Bulacan 11.jpg a COM:DW problem or not? If so, is de minimis application a possible recourse or option to the potential DW problem or not? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: The artwork should be considered as a COM:DW. IMO de minimis could not be applied, as the poster occupies a big portion of the image. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Shavkat Mirziyoyev and Sapar Isakov (06-09-2017).jpg

Hi, can I replace the image by uploading a free one (probably from the meeting between Mirziyoyev and Isakov)? Since here the issue with the current one is quite controversial, and it may take a couple of days to sort it out. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 17:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Antonio Carlos Rodrigues.JPG

May I ask why you decided to remove the license from File:Antonio Carlos Rodrigues.JPG without any sort of useful edit summary? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: Should be a mistakes, sorry. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

What are you doing?

Why are you nominating my derived files for deletion? Original files from kremlin.ru licensed under CC-BY-4.0 and from YouTube licensed under CC-BY-3.0. There is no "Share-Alike" restriction here, I'm not required to distribute under the same license. I reworked the files, increasing their clarity and adding a flag. I indicated the original source, indicated the original author. I would still understand if I would completely pass off the work as my own without attribution. So there is no reason for nominations here. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 07:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@Roman Kubanskiy: You may used the copyright materials for the derivative work, i.e. the background is different from the original file, and it may be protected by copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I made the background myself in Photoshop, applying a generated a little texture and adding a bit of blurring plus I added a solid gray background. By the way, do you specifically upload duplicate files to delete mine files? There is a button to request a rename if you are not satisfied with the file. You can also set a more correct date, license, maybe better image resolution and so on. The file already existed, I filled it in earlier, it was already with Mirziyoyev and Zhaparov, I also had it loaded earlier. and you take and brazenly upload a duplicate, forcing my file to be deleted. Do you really want to hurt others? Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 07:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
@Roman Kubanskiy: Your files are not the largest, they are regarded as scaled-down files. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I went to the Japan website, and there is exactly the same file resolution. How did you get a little more resolution? You could easily overwrite my file, it's just a couple of pixels. But no, we will specifically delete my files, because they are like duplicates. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 07:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

PD files from vlada.mk

@A1Cafel Check out also c:File:Zoran Zaev official portrait 2020 (cropped).jpg and others like that. I don't think it's PD files from vlada.mk. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 08:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@Roman Kubanskiy: Open a DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:15th government of North Macedonia. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

9621North Luzon Expressway 07.jpg

Hello. Is File:9621North Luzon Expressway 07.jpg fine (or can de minimis be applied) or not? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: Should be fine. IMO COM:DM rule #3 can be applied. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done adding the de minimis tag and also trimming irrelevant parts of the description. Thanks for the reply. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Antoine Daniel - NéoCast2 - 3 (cropped).jpg

Hi and thanks for your constructive revert. The revision comment was particularly relevant. Anyway, the file description links to an archived permission from the author to release the file under the terms of a CC-BY-SA licence, therefore the copyright violation you are inferring is not obvious and a speedy deletion is not the right procedure. As you did with the other files uploaded by ArtificeBoy, this image should go through a deletion request. ›› Fugitron - 17:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama for graphic works in Australia and in Ireland

Hi. What, in your view, is the difference between this Australian image that you transferred from Flickr (in which a graphical work (poster) appears), this Canadian image that you recently reviewed (in which a graphical work (advert) appears), and this Irish image that I transferred from Geograph (in which an incidental graphical work (shop sticker) appears)? Given that FoP for "graphic works" do not apply in any of these countries (Australia, Canada, etc), how is it that an excessive interpretation of that standard applies to one of these images, but not to others? Or those that you transfer from other Commons projects yourself? Guliolopez (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

It takes time to check. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

May I know why you are interested in deleting the photos

Please let me know Nippon 725 (talk) 12:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Fotos deleteion

@A1Cafel Sie haben meine fotos zum loschen markiert. Warum ist das so? die fotos, die ich gemacht habe, sind keine anderen. Wenn sie grund zu der annahme haben, dass es sich um Urheberrechtsverletzungen handelt, konnen Sie dies bitte beweisen?

@A1Cafel You marked my photos for deletion. Why is that? The photos I took are not copieid. If you have reason to believe that it is copyright violation, can you please prove it?— Preceding unsigned comment added by DerDeutscheFotograf (talk • contribs) 13:53, 1 April 2021‎ (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Sobre File:Congreso da GOLPE DE ESTADO - Periódico. Protesta contra Merino.png

Hola. Aquella imagen la encontré con licencia, pero parece que no del todo. ¿Si borro la imagen (la cara del personaje que aparece ahí) y solo dejo las palabras estaría bien para su permanencia? Gracias de antemano.

(Rolo Mai (talk) 04:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC))

@Rolo Mai: (Using translation tool) Siéntete libre de hacerlo. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Please don't ping me

A1Cafel, my recollection is that I have never talked with you before. I know the reason you pinged me is because you want to discuss about the pictures involving FOP-Taiwan issues, but I am very upset with your actions in this case. I'm totally not in the mood to know why did you ping me specifically. Everyone has their own bad experience, so I don't want to recall my experience with discussed the FOP-Taiwan. Also, I was angry at your disrespect. Please don't ping me about these sorts of things in the future.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: Hey! Don't ignore me. If you see the message "Please don't ping me​," then you are obliged to respond or it may create a misunderstanding.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
@Kai3952: OK I get it (I misunderstand that I should avoid pinging you). --A1Cafel (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

O.C.A. airsoft command. Nizhny Novgorod

All images were photographed by me on different equipment. Sometimes I take pictures not only with Nikon D3100, but I also pick up my phone and take pictures with it, as well as send photos through instant messengers. However, if you are interested in photo quality, then I can take new photos with my Nikon camera. --AlexTref871 (talk) 10:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Someone is eclipse ready (25330716970).jpg

File:Someone is eclipse ready (25330716970).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Minoraxtalk 05:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

old FlickrLickr-uploads

Hi A1Cafel, these old uploads from Flickr by FlickrLickr had been reviewed at time of upload by different established users, even admins. I therefore suspect that to be cases of change-of-license on Flickr after upload to Commons. Did you check for that at least in some cases via archive.org or alike?

--Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Have checked some via Wayback Machine. They are either not yet saved, or the earliest available version is already violates COM:L. You may double check to see if I'm wrong. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Ok. However, is the FlickrLickr process now considered faulty or unreliable? --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
@Túrelio: I don't know. However, I see the other Flickr photos uploaded via FlickrLickr also have the license review by the bot or trusted users, so I think the above files should be reviewed as well. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
I am not accustomed to the FlickrLickr process. However, if I read the record/description of all these files correctly, then they had been reviewed, as the name of the reviewers (different users) is included in the description. So, if you don't trust this process, I would recommend you to open a general discussion about that at VP. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit Summary

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary: 
 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

About those uploads

I may have uploaded some files with the wrong license. I didn't know licensing very well. I have been warned with Pixabay most of times. I learned it. But this time, you try to remove my own work 

[[File:Gölyazı sahili.jpg]]

This is unacceptable.

Photo in "File:Diyarbakır kk2.jpg" taken from a commons uploaded file. So this is wrong too.

I can say that I will be more careful. But trying to remove my own work is not right!

--Henrymorgan92 (talk) 08:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

@Henrymorgan92: We need sources for your derivative works.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Mirage - Doug Aitken.jpg, File:The Circle of Land and Sky - Philip K Smith.jpg, and File:Curves and Zigzags - Claudia Comte.jpg

WHy did you mark this file as a copyright violation and delete it from my commons page on 4/15/21? This was my own work taken at a public art exhibit and not in any way a violation of anybody's copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teilhardo (talk • contribs) 21:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

proof

https://eksisozluk.com/entry/122043487

--Henrymorgan92 (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Mardi Gras 2012 Video 3 (6951085949).jpg

Was this file meant to be a video? If so, I don't believe the software you used can transfer videos. 1989 (talk) 02:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Jim Inhofe and Israeli PM Netanyahu February 2019.jpg

File:Jim Inhofe and Israeli PM Netanyahu February 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

219.78.191.96 16:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Deleting an uploaded photo

matter closed EdifyingEditor (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC) You deleted my delete request that noted a copyright violation but did not delete the photo in violation. The photo needs to be deleted--not the delete request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdifyingEditor (talk • contribs) 07:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 

Template:Copyrightvio

EdifyingEditor (talk) 08:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC) EdifyingEditor (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

My request

matter closed. EdifyingEditor (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Deleting images I uploaded from Flickr

Hi A1Cafel, Many thanks for having reviewed the images I uploaded from Flickr, and for having explained to me why that was not legitimate. I had not grapsped the subtle differences between various é2.0" CC licenses. I better get it now, and of course fully accept that they be promptly deleted. --Judemonde (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Files for SVG benchmark

Thanks for checking files for duplicates and many other important tasks you are doing.

On Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_for_SVG_benchmark I requested the undeletion of two almost duplicates, which are needed for a SVG Benchmark for phab:T40010. The differences are

  • batik has a too strong blur and is too dark (inkscape is better on this)
  • librsvg is almost identical with resvg, but it has a too bright withe dot in the left eye

Since it is part of a SVG-benchmark, files should be accessible and check-able by everyone, even with minor differences, to see e.g. differences in file-size.

I hope undeleting is ok for you.

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:55, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: No objection. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Recent speedy deletions

Hi A1Cafel. Thank you for paying attention for the files and for all the help. But, I think that your recent speedy deletion proposal for my uploaded files is not correct, as they a are a official BRazilian Presidential ones, even for the photografic registration of the computer screen durint the video calls, just like this one. This a completely different situation than the one when someone take a picture of a television broadecasted (protected) content. Regards, Sturm (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination

You have tagged the files speedy deletion Kelly Craft visit to Israel, December 2020 just after the same issue turned to regular DR. They are not qulify as speedy. Please read Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#File cerfuly. -- Geagea (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Andrew Brown Protest in Graham (2021 Apr 27) (51144595300).jpg

File:Andrew Brown Protest in Graham (2021 Apr 27) (51144595300).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Harold Jones image on E. Harold Jones page

The MEtropolitan museum of art is WELL KNOWN to allow their images to be used by Creative Commons. I've added the permission link, so remove your bot now. https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/policies-and-documents/open-access K8shep (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

deleted Eumetsat-based images

Hi @A1Cafel and Polarlys: , this is a follow-up of "deleted Eumetsat-based images" in talk:A1Cafel, 2020-11-28 to 2020-12-05

Following your "request for deletion" (@A1Cafel, 2020-11-11), and your effective deletion (@Polarlys, 2020-11-18),
I've requested EUMETSAT to clarify their licensing policies about RGB images they provide on their web site.

They replied (by email, 2021-02-16) to my inquiry (2020-12-07), and agreed with my lecture of "Legal Framework / Data Policy":

  • RGB images are considered “Advanced Image Product” and hence declared Essential data
  • "EUMETSAT shall make [...] Advance Image Products available to all users world-wide on a free and unrestricted basis"


1) how can I relay to Wikimedia_Commons the email response from "Legal Affairs Division" (@EUMETSAT)?

2) who (singular, plural, group...?) will then receive/be_able_to_read this email copy?

3) are names/email_addresses/private_information secured and how?

4) please, restore deleted images

5) please restore modified pages, in [language].wikipedia, with their information prior to images deletion

6) please, in later times, read, understand, the arguments/explanations of others, rather than using brute action!


Note: I'll provide a template, for this upgraded 2020_data_policy.


yours, En rouge (talk) 21:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


PS: in RGB pages, "Data Policy" (last item in left menu) is still broken (EUMETSAT is warned)

Please see Commons:OTRS. I do not withdraw from my deletion decision. The terms of use (https://www.eumetsat.int/about-us/terms-use) were and are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. I will not restore anything until it has been clearly documented by the rights holder that the files may be used under a free license. Regards, --Polarlys (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Dijego (126000881).jpg

File:Dijego (126000881).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Fishing_at_Cocodrie_LA_Christian.jpg

Hello, I have requested undeletion of a photo which I uploaded 10 years ago which you had speedy deleted. Please see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Fishing_at_Cocodrie_LA_Christian.jpg and comment there if you wish. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Solar and lunar eclipses in Russia

Please STOP doing such edits like this. Otherwise I write to Russian-language admins and they block you. I checked the license of this file in 2017 and I'm sure that Chibisov Sergey = ru:User:Abu Omar in Russian Wikipedia and you can see this edit: link. To delete any file you must prove more than "I think it's not uploader's work". Files which is clearly are not uploader's work I send to deletion too. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Re: Deletion requests

It's true, those images are taken from facebook. But I'm the one who took the photos, and I'm the one who posted them on facebook a few years ago. So the permission is right. How can I prove it? --Dedda71 (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

@Dedda71: You should provide the link of the Facebook account for identity verification. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Flickr

good day, A1Cafel Pls upload this file https://www.flickr.com/photos/eliot_photos/51238097483/ this is from Flickr, to use in infobox thanks HurricaneEdgar 06:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

@HurricaneEdgar: Unfortunately the license of the image is "All Rights Reserved", which is not a capable license on Commons. Commons only accepts license like CC-BY-SA / CC-BY / CC0. Unless the copyright holder changes the license, they cannot be uploaded to Commons, thanks. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Joe Biden and Boris Johnson at their 1-on-1 meeting before G7.jpg

File:Joe Biden and Boris Johnson at their 1-on-1 meeting before G7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Joe Biden and Boris Johnson at Carbis Bay 2021 G7.jpg

File:Joe Biden and Boris Johnson at Carbis Bay 2021 G7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi A1Cafel. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

G7 categories

Have moved the G7 category from Category:Carbis Bay Beach to Category:Carbis Bay - feel this makes more sense as the summit was in the village and as not all of the photos are of the beach. At some point when the number of photos being added to the category has dropped a bit I'll go through and re-categorise all the photos of the beach. Thanks, Gazamp (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Tiananmen Square, Beijing, China 1988 (1).jpg

Good day. I have converted your "speedy" delete tag for File:Tiananmen Square, Beijing, China 1988 (1).jpg, and changed it to a deletion request. I did this because the reason why you thought it a copyviol was not evident to me, and the file has been in wide use in multiple Wikipedias for years. Please comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tiananmen Square, Beijing, China 1988 (1).jpg. (Note: In my opinion, you sometimes seem too quick to tag things as "speedy" that would much more appropriately go through deletion discussion.) Thanks for your attention. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg

File:177.Before.DykeMarch.WDC.7June2019 (51240382990).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

62.216.207.31 20:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Dost Mohammad Khan Bhopal

@A1Cafel: I've never seen the original deletion requests for this picture (the source file) that your hell bent on deleting. The original image being uploaded by the amateur photographer. It was piece of tat, not taken by a professional. Why don't you answer comms to yourself. 10:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Liberty during Solar eclipse of 2021 June 10.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Aung San Suu Kyi and Vladimir Putin (2019-04-26) 01.jpg

File:Aung San Suu Kyi and Vladimir Putin (2019-04-26) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

219.78.191.198 15:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate requests

Please do not request the keeping of the newly uploaded file, unless it is a decidedly better quality file, then it should be the one that is tagged as the duplicate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Should be a mistake, sorry--A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

File:20 di Wikiped...io!.jpg

Hi A1Cafel, I provided additional informations about the derivated works and deleted your warning. I wanted to be more specific, but you should know that Public Domain or CC0 license - all the original works were released with these licenses - have no specific restrictions or requirements, so no more infos were really mandatory. Best, --Camelia (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC).

Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of La Pieta - Ceiling.jpg

Thank you for finding this appointment that I had forgotten along the way. Thank you also for its inclusion in the contest. Finally thank you for closing the nomintions I very much appreciate this help. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: You're welcome. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donald Trump, presidential portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michel Temer, portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

White House rainbow for SCOTUS ruling on same-sex marriage.jpg

If you allow it, I make the adjustment and I place it. With everything you do it's a fair return. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: You're feel free to do so. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

File:EtihadTower.jpg

Hello, All the images that I uploaded aren’t a panorama except for EtihadTowers.jpg. There are also other panorama images taken in the UAE, but why is it only my works that are being selected? ADNOCHQ.jpg and other files aren’t a panorama, since they only show a single building. Lyonerov (talk)—Preceding undated comment was added at 11:26, 1 July 2021‎ (UTC)

@Lyonerov: Please read COM:FOP UAE. A photograph of a building is considered as a derivative work, and permission from the copyright holder, i.e. the architect is required. Freedom of panorama (FOP) is an exception of excluding the permission from the copyright holder. Unfortunately, UAE does not have FOP, so permission from the architect is needed. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rainbow White House.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

The things I do at Wikimedia is I crop images. I do not upload the original ones. Those are the persons you should be warning. The images I crop seem to have legitimate licenses at the moment I decide to crop them for purposes like adding them into someone's infobox, so they seem to have legitimate licenses until in this case, they do not.

Also it is strange File:John ingvar carlsson311.tif was deleted back in August yet File:John ingvar carlsson311 (cropped).tif has only just been marked. Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Mercedes Siles

Hi! When I cropped File:Mercedes Siles (cropped).jpg, I didn't check the copyright of the original image. If you delete File:Mercedes Siles (cropped).jpg due to copyright violation, I won't object. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations

Thank you for nominating questionable files for deletion! When you nominate for Speedy deletion, please be sure to provide an external link to proof of the problem. For example, File:Hwang Yau -tai and daughter at Mong Kok station, Hong Kong.jpg has nomination as a derivative. What is it a derivative of? 2) File:Parque De La Madre.jpg has nomination as a facebook file. Why do you think it came from facebook? You did many right so not all are problems. Having these links aids evaluation of the problem by the deleting admin. Royalbroil 03:21, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Patryk Janas 1.jpg I can't find that image on the google search result, just similar images. Royalbroil 03:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Hwang Yau -tai and daughter at Mong Kok station, Hong Kong.jpg is a historical image taken in 1973, which appears to be taken from some other place but not the uploader's work. But based on your questioning, I change the tag to {{Dw-nsd}}. File:Parque De La Madre.jpg is a Facebook image per "FBMD" Metadata, the issue was discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). I have changed the reason of SD for File:Patryk Janas 1.jpg. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Kill_The_Bill

Category discussion warning

Kill The Bill has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Gazamp (talk) 20:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

2019 European Amateur Team Championship, photo of winning team

On the article 2019 European Amater Team Championship I have published a photo of the winning team. I have been wrongly noticed that the photo is not free to use.

A press release from the Swedish Golf Federation https://golf.se/pressrum/2019/07/historiskt-medaljregn-over-sverige-i-lag-em/ they states (in Swedish): "Bilder och filmade intervjuer fria att använda om du anger fotografens namn kan laddas ned här för fri användning"

English translation: "Pictures and filmed interviews are free to use if you note the name of the photographer May be downloaded here for free use"EEJB (talk) 06:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@EEJB: The terms "Free (to) use" is vague, with no indication of allowing commercial use and the make of derivative works. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Will a written permission by e-mail from the Swedish Golf Federation for use on Wikipedia be enough? The purpose with this photos is to spread them to media an get attention.EEJB (talk) 08:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@EEJB: You could submit the written permission to OTRS--A1Cafel (talk) 14:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

LRR

Hello, Just in case you didn't recieve my ping at LRR - Please stop nominating people as we don't do nominations like that and obviously the 2 you've nominated have both declined. If someone wanted to be an LRR they would do it themselves. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Bosco Verticale photo

Hey, what's the problem with my photo of Bosco Verticale? Why it should be deleted? I don't understand. Darsheni (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

@Darsheni: Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bosco Verticale for more information. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Booklooker

Hello A1Cafel, there was an error in categorizing names. The redirect is now usefull. Thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh in his 70s.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Fotos to be reconsidered and not deleted

Hi A1Cafel, thanks for your comments on the photo, however this is a mistake I got the rights for the photo and that is why I can upload it. Please, remove the copyright violation request. If you have any question or further comments, I will be glad to answer and hear it. Best, --Elwinlhq (talk) 10:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

@Elwinlhq: You should submit the permission to OTRS as a prove. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Princess Elizabeth (United Kingdom) as a teenager.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Jo Cox Birthday Memorial - 08 (27744547932).jpg

File:Jo Cox Birthday Memorial - 08 (27744547932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Verbcatcher (talk) 22:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

License Reviewer

Thank you for tagging some files, like File:Anderson Paak - Øyafestivalen 2016.jpg as unfree. However, you are not a license reviewer, so you were not able to tag it correctly. To become a license reviewer, submit a request on Commons:License review/Requests. Elisfkc (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

photo deletion

hi, first, I'd like to find some information about a license in Korean. There's no clear explanation in my language. So I used google translation. Anyways, I uploaded some photos that I took pictures of my old CDs. In this case where's license? Recording label? Artist company? the photographers?(no info sometimes) Please let me know.

Thank you. --Vanilie (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

@Vanilie: A photo of an album cover is a kind of derivative work, unless they are old enough to be in the Public Domain, we need the permission from the copyright holder. You may submit the permission to OTRS system--A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
@A1Cafel: oh... Thanks. but who's the copyright holder? label? photographer? the artist?
@Vanilie: Should be the labels--A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
@A1Cafel: got it! thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanilie (talk • contribs) 03:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Gwennie-nyan Uploads

The images can be found by clicking on the photo tab of the page given as a source. As for their status as PD the template says "However, the NWS sites also host non-NWS images which have been submitted by individuals: these are generally shown as "Courtesy of ...". Such images have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process." which was added by User:Runningonbrains in 2008 at the creation of the template. I don't think speedy is really a viable approach here.Geni (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

The information on PD-NWS seems to be accurate based on https://www.weather.gov/lmk/photo_submission_information which explicitly states all photos submitted and featured on the website are explicitly PD. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 16:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Af Elaich.jpg הרשאה לתמונה

Hello A1Cafel, I've just emailed the permission from the photographer of this photo File:Af Elaich.jpg to permissions-he@wikimedia.org Thank you.

Zigboom (talk) 17:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Deletion rationale for NWS images.

I see you have nominated several images, hosted on National Weather Service websites, for deletion on the basis that those pictures were taken by third parties. Those images are still public domain since the authors release their images to the public domain when they submit them to be published by the NWS. This much is stated in the {{PD-NWS}} template. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

It is also stated on the NWS website: [1]. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

deletion 6acteurs.jpg

Hello,

I have no access to the Commons:Deletion request ("This project page has been protected because this is not where your deletion request goes! Please read the instructions again.").

About the photo, it is extract from my film "Teenagers" (I am the director and producer Paul de Métairy). See on www.lucas-said.net. The Productions Forever own all rights about this photo. Thus, please don't delete !

Thanks

Paul de Métairy lucas.said@free.fr — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.57.10.227 (talk) 07:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@PaulVerh: Screenshot of non-free content are prohibited, see derivative works for more info. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Is blocking me fair?

So... I might get blocked because I cropped some old images from Commons not knowing that they are going to turn out to be copyright violating? Is that really fair? I'm paying for somebody else's mistakes here. --Czarnybog (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
portrait photography of Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands wearing his royal robes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

My photos have been marked deleted and one has been deleted

@A1Cafel Why are you marking my photos as "a copyright violation because it is not my own work"? All the photos on the page https://is.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigr%C3%BAn_%C3%9Eur%C3%AD%C3%B0ur_Geirsd%C3%B3ttir are my own photos, taken by me, or made by me Please unmark my photos to be deleted

  1. Sigrún Þuríður Geirsdóttir og forseti Íslands, Guðni Th. Jóhannesson.jpg
  2. Heimildarmyndin Þegiðu og syntu.png
  3. Þegiðu og syntu.png
  4. Upplýsingaskilti um eyjasundið.jpg
  5. Eyjasundsbikarinn.jpg
  6. Sundleið Sigrúnar yfir Ermarsundið.png
  7. Forseti Íslands og Sigrún Þuríður Geirsdóttir.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.220.124.205 (talk) 22:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi A1Cafel. Thank you for your comments regarding the following files:

All of these photos have been provided by the artist - Paul Masvidal directly to me and I uploaded on his behalf. I am aware of the copyright policies as Paul had sent OTRS requests for other files as well. Does this have to be done for each of these files individually or can there be some sort of a batch approval as it is coming directly from the artist? Kindly advise. Thanks in advance. -- Abhaysingh1978 (talk) 10:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

@Abhaysingh1978: If you have submit the permission to OTRS, an OTRS agent will forward the email. If they received it then they will replace the copyvio tags with {{OP}}--A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@Abhaysingh1978: Usually the files concerned are listed in the letter to OTRS. If there is a new batch, a new letter is needed. I suppose using the same ticket number might make things smoother. –LPfi (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:A1Cafel/Archive_7&oldid=763445923"